Three Approaches to Criticisms and Support in Evaluation of Arguments
Introduction. In the article we defend a claim that criticisms and counterarguments play a more important role in modeling and evaluating arguments than defending and supporting the thesis. The novelty of this idea lies in that it shifts the main focus of the study of argumentation from the support...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | E. N. Lisanyuk |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University
2022-04-01
|
| Series: | Дискурс |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://discourse.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/477 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Document and Inferential Analysis of Imam Reza's Narration on the Rational Argument for Caution
by: Sayyid Ali Delbari
Published: (2023-12-01) -
A look at the rational arguments for the abstraction of the human soul from the perspective of Ayatollah Javadi Amoli
by: Ali Ghadrdangharamaleki, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Advancing Deliberative Discourse Measurement: The Intersection with Computational Abstract Argumentation in Discourse Quality Evaluations
by: Sanjay Kumar, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Reviewing Argument Schemes for Legal Arguments of Statutory Interpretation
by: Eduardo Brandão Nunes
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Argument from Ignorance and Argument from Silence
by: E. N. Lisanyuk, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)