Differences in influenza testing and treatment in micropolitan versus metropolitan areas in the U.S. using medicare claims data from 2010 to 2016

Abstract Background To improve understanding of influenza and rurality, we investigated differences in influenza testing and anti-viral treatment rates between micropolitan (muSAs) and metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) using national medical claims data over multiple influenza seasons. Methods U...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexia Couture, F. Scott Dahlgren, Hector S. Izurieta, Richard A. Forshee, Yun Lu, Carrie Reed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21555-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585293925974016
author Alexia Couture
F. Scott Dahlgren
Hector S. Izurieta
Richard A. Forshee
Yun Lu
Carrie Reed
author_facet Alexia Couture
F. Scott Dahlgren
Hector S. Izurieta
Richard A. Forshee
Yun Lu
Carrie Reed
author_sort Alexia Couture
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To improve understanding of influenza and rurality, we investigated differences in influenza testing and anti-viral treatment rates between micropolitan (muSAs) and metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) using national medical claims data over multiple influenza seasons. Methods Using billing data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for those aged 65 years and older, we estimated weekly rates of ordered rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDT) and antivirals (AV) among Medicare enrollees by core-based statistical areas (CBSAs) during 2010–2016. We used Negative Binomial generalized mixed models to estimate adjusted rate ratios (aRR) between MSAs and muSAs, adjusting for clustering by CBSA plus explanatory variables. We ran models for all weeks and only high influenza activity weeks. Results For all weeks, the unadjusted rate of RIDTs was 1.97 per 10,000 people in MSAs compared with 2.69 in muSAs (Rate ratio (RR) = 0.73, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.73–0.74) and of AVs was 1.85 in MSAs compared with 1.40 in muSAs (RR = 1.32, CI: 1.31–1.32). From the multivariate model, aRR for RIDTs was 0.82 (0.73–0.94) and for AVs was 1.12 (1.04–1.22) in MSAs versus muSAs. For high influenza activity weeks, aRR for RIDTs was 0.82 (0.73–0.92) and for AVs was 1.15 (1.06–1.24). All models found influenza testing rates higher in muSAs and treatment rates higher in MSAs. Conclusions Our study found lower testing and higher treatment in U.S. metropolitan versus micropolitan areas from 2010 to 2016 for those aged 65 years and older in our population. Identifying differences in influenza rates by rurality may improve public health response. Further research into the relationship of rurality and health disparities is needed.
format Article
id doaj-art-7e596ac9de58498d96a3baeda62b34eb
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2458
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj-art-7e596ac9de58498d96a3baeda62b34eb2025-01-26T12:56:33ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582025-01-0125111010.1186/s12889-025-21555-4Differences in influenza testing and treatment in micropolitan versus metropolitan areas in the U.S. using medicare claims data from 2010 to 2016Alexia Couture0F. Scott Dahlgren1Hector S. Izurieta2Richard A. Forshee3Yun Lu4Carrie Reed5Epidemiology and Prevention Branch, Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionFaculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of TechnologyCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug AdministrationCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug AdministrationCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug AdministrationEpidemiology and Prevention Branch, Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAbstract Background To improve understanding of influenza and rurality, we investigated differences in influenza testing and anti-viral treatment rates between micropolitan (muSAs) and metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) using national medical claims data over multiple influenza seasons. Methods Using billing data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for those aged 65 years and older, we estimated weekly rates of ordered rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDT) and antivirals (AV) among Medicare enrollees by core-based statistical areas (CBSAs) during 2010–2016. We used Negative Binomial generalized mixed models to estimate adjusted rate ratios (aRR) between MSAs and muSAs, adjusting for clustering by CBSA plus explanatory variables. We ran models for all weeks and only high influenza activity weeks. Results For all weeks, the unadjusted rate of RIDTs was 1.97 per 10,000 people in MSAs compared with 2.69 in muSAs (Rate ratio (RR) = 0.73, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.73–0.74) and of AVs was 1.85 in MSAs compared with 1.40 in muSAs (RR = 1.32, CI: 1.31–1.32). From the multivariate model, aRR for RIDTs was 0.82 (0.73–0.94) and for AVs was 1.12 (1.04–1.22) in MSAs versus muSAs. For high influenza activity weeks, aRR for RIDTs was 0.82 (0.73–0.92) and for AVs was 1.15 (1.06–1.24). All models found influenza testing rates higher in muSAs and treatment rates higher in MSAs. Conclusions Our study found lower testing and higher treatment in U.S. metropolitan versus micropolitan areas from 2010 to 2016 for those aged 65 years and older in our population. Identifying differences in influenza rates by rurality may improve public health response. Further research into the relationship of rurality and health disparities is needed.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21555-4InfluenzaAntiviralsRapid-testingRurality
spellingShingle Alexia Couture
F. Scott Dahlgren
Hector S. Izurieta
Richard A. Forshee
Yun Lu
Carrie Reed
Differences in influenza testing and treatment in micropolitan versus metropolitan areas in the U.S. using medicare claims data from 2010 to 2016
BMC Public Health
Influenza
Antivirals
Rapid-testing
Rurality
title Differences in influenza testing and treatment in micropolitan versus metropolitan areas in the U.S. using medicare claims data from 2010 to 2016
title_full Differences in influenza testing and treatment in micropolitan versus metropolitan areas in the U.S. using medicare claims data from 2010 to 2016
title_fullStr Differences in influenza testing and treatment in micropolitan versus metropolitan areas in the U.S. using medicare claims data from 2010 to 2016
title_full_unstemmed Differences in influenza testing and treatment in micropolitan versus metropolitan areas in the U.S. using medicare claims data from 2010 to 2016
title_short Differences in influenza testing and treatment in micropolitan versus metropolitan areas in the U.S. using medicare claims data from 2010 to 2016
title_sort differences in influenza testing and treatment in micropolitan versus metropolitan areas in the u s using medicare claims data from 2010 to 2016
topic Influenza
Antivirals
Rapid-testing
Rurality
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21555-4
work_keys_str_mv AT alexiacouture differencesininfluenzatestingandtreatmentinmicropolitanversusmetropolitanareasintheususingmedicareclaimsdatafrom2010to2016
AT fscottdahlgren differencesininfluenzatestingandtreatmentinmicropolitanversusmetropolitanareasintheususingmedicareclaimsdatafrom2010to2016
AT hectorsizurieta differencesininfluenzatestingandtreatmentinmicropolitanversusmetropolitanareasintheususingmedicareclaimsdatafrom2010to2016
AT richardaforshee differencesininfluenzatestingandtreatmentinmicropolitanversusmetropolitanareasintheususingmedicareclaimsdatafrom2010to2016
AT yunlu differencesininfluenzatestingandtreatmentinmicropolitanversusmetropolitanareasintheususingmedicareclaimsdatafrom2010to2016
AT carriereed differencesininfluenzatestingandtreatmentinmicropolitanversusmetropolitanareasintheususingmedicareclaimsdatafrom2010to2016