Factorial Structure of Cognitive Activity Using a Neuropsychological Test Battery

A general neuropsychological test battery was assembled and individually given to a 98-subject sample, aged 11–12 years old. The battery included some basic and common tests routinely used in the evaluation of language, memory, spatial abilities, concept formation, and praxic abilities. Twenty-five...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Ardila, M. Rosselli, J. R. Bateman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1994-01-01
Series:Behavioural Neurology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BEN-1994-7202
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563366129827840
author A. Ardila
M. Rosselli
J. R. Bateman
author_facet A. Ardila
M. Rosselli
J. R. Bateman
author_sort A. Ardila
collection DOAJ
description A general neuropsychological test battery was assembled and individually given to a 98-subject sample, aged 11–12 years old. The battery included some basic and common tests routinely used in the evaluation of language, memory, spatial abilities, concept formation, and praxic abilities. Twenty-five different scores were calculated. A factor analysis with varimax rotation disclosed nine different factors, accounting for about 70% of the variance. Factor I was measured by a Sequential Verbal Memory test and Verbal Fluency subtests (“verbal factor”). Factor II was measured by the Wechsler Memory Scale Visual Memory subtests (immediate and delayed reproduction), and the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (copy and immediate reproduction) (“non-verbal memory and constructional factor”). Factor III was measured by the WMS Logical Memory subtests (immediate and delayed; “verbal memory factor”). Factor IV was associated with fine movements (tapping subtests, right and left hand; “fine movements factor”). Factor V was specially measured by the Information subtest of the WMS and the Boston Naming Test (“verbal knowledge”). Factor VI represented a “praxic ability factor” (ideomotor praxis tests). Delayed Associative Learning subtest measured Factor VII; and Digits measured Factor VIII. Factor IX was a “mental control factor” (Mental Control subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale). The implications of these results to theories relating to the structure of cognitive activity are discussed.
format Article
id doaj-art-7d911671a26e43dd8bccdfe217eb498f
institution Kabale University
issn 0953-4180
1875-8584
language English
publishDate 1994-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Behavioural Neurology
spelling doaj-art-7d911671a26e43dd8bccdfe217eb498f2025-02-03T01:20:19ZengWileyBehavioural Neurology0953-41801875-85841994-01-0172495810.3233/BEN-1994-7202Factorial Structure of Cognitive Activity Using a Neuropsychological Test BatteryA. Ardila0M. Rosselli1J. R. Bateman2Instituto Colombiano de Neuropsicologia, Bogotá, ColombiaHospital San Juan de Dios, Bogotá, ColombiaFundación Universitaria “Konrad Lorenz”, Bogotá, ColombiaA general neuropsychological test battery was assembled and individually given to a 98-subject sample, aged 11–12 years old. The battery included some basic and common tests routinely used in the evaluation of language, memory, spatial abilities, concept formation, and praxic abilities. Twenty-five different scores were calculated. A factor analysis with varimax rotation disclosed nine different factors, accounting for about 70% of the variance. Factor I was measured by a Sequential Verbal Memory test and Verbal Fluency subtests (“verbal factor”). Factor II was measured by the Wechsler Memory Scale Visual Memory subtests (immediate and delayed reproduction), and the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (copy and immediate reproduction) (“non-verbal memory and constructional factor”). Factor III was measured by the WMS Logical Memory subtests (immediate and delayed; “verbal memory factor”). Factor IV was associated with fine movements (tapping subtests, right and left hand; “fine movements factor”). Factor V was specially measured by the Information subtest of the WMS and the Boston Naming Test (“verbal knowledge”). Factor VI represented a “praxic ability factor” (ideomotor praxis tests). Delayed Associative Learning subtest measured Factor VII; and Digits measured Factor VIII. Factor IX was a “mental control factor” (Mental Control subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale). The implications of these results to theories relating to the structure of cognitive activity are discussed.http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BEN-1994-7202
spellingShingle A. Ardila
M. Rosselli
J. R. Bateman
Factorial Structure of Cognitive Activity Using a Neuropsychological Test Battery
Behavioural Neurology
title Factorial Structure of Cognitive Activity Using a Neuropsychological Test Battery
title_full Factorial Structure of Cognitive Activity Using a Neuropsychological Test Battery
title_fullStr Factorial Structure of Cognitive Activity Using a Neuropsychological Test Battery
title_full_unstemmed Factorial Structure of Cognitive Activity Using a Neuropsychological Test Battery
title_short Factorial Structure of Cognitive Activity Using a Neuropsychological Test Battery
title_sort factorial structure of cognitive activity using a neuropsychological test battery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BEN-1994-7202
work_keys_str_mv AT aardila factorialstructureofcognitiveactivityusinganeuropsychologicaltestbattery
AT mrosselli factorialstructureofcognitiveactivityusinganeuropsychologicaltestbattery
AT jrbateman factorialstructureofcognitiveactivityusinganeuropsychologicaltestbattery