Literature Review Comparing Laparoscopic and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomies in a Pediatric Population

Objective. This study compares laparoscopic and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in a paediatric population to test the hypothesis that there is a difference in the frequency of serious gastrointestinal complications between the two methods. Methods. All reports published between 1995 and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madelen Lantz, Helena Hultin Larsson, Einar Arnbjörnsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010-01-01
Series:International Journal of Pediatrics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/507616
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563365911724032
author Madelen Lantz
Helena Hultin Larsson
Einar Arnbjörnsson
author_facet Madelen Lantz
Helena Hultin Larsson
Einar Arnbjörnsson
author_sort Madelen Lantz
collection DOAJ
description Objective. This study compares laparoscopic and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in a paediatric population to test the hypothesis that there is a difference in the frequency of serious gastrointestinal complications between the two methods. Methods. All reports published between 1995 and 2009 on laparoscopic gastrostomy and PEG in children was included. Prospective and retrospective trials, comparing the two methods or dealing with one of them only were included. Endpoints were accidentally performed gastrointestinal fistula causing an emergency re-operation. The frequency of inadvertent gastroenteric fistulas using the two different techniques was calculated. Results. 822 publications were found when using the search terms: gastrostomy, gastrointestinal complications, and all child: 0–18 years. From these, 54 studies were extracted for this investigation. These studies reported a total of 4331 children undergoing gastrostomy operation, 1027 by using the laparoscopic technique and 3304 using the PEG technique. The number of serious gastrointestinal fistulas to colon or small bowel was 0% and .27%, respectively, P<.05. Conclusions. The results suggest that by performing laparoscopic gastrostomy in children it is possible to avoid the serious intestinal fistula complications caused by a blind puncture through the abdominal cavity when performing the PEG.
format Article
id doaj-art-7d613d2bb697484bb67c09bd585daf4b
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9740
1687-9759
language English
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Pediatrics
spelling doaj-art-7d613d2bb697484bb67c09bd585daf4b2025-02-03T01:20:25ZengWileyInternational Journal of Pediatrics1687-97401687-97592010-01-01201010.1155/2010/507616507616Literature Review Comparing Laparoscopic and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomies in a Pediatric PopulationMadelen Lantz0Helena Hultin Larsson1Einar Arnbjörnsson2Department of Pediatric Surgery, Lund University Hospital, Sweden and Lund University Medical Center Skane (UMCS), 221 85 Lund, SwedenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Lund University Hospital, Sweden and Lund University Medical Center Skane (UMCS), 221 85 Lund, SwedenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Lund University Hospital, Sweden and Lund University Medical Center Skane (UMCS), 221 85 Lund, SwedenObjective. This study compares laparoscopic and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in a paediatric population to test the hypothesis that there is a difference in the frequency of serious gastrointestinal complications between the two methods. Methods. All reports published between 1995 and 2009 on laparoscopic gastrostomy and PEG in children was included. Prospective and retrospective trials, comparing the two methods or dealing with one of them only were included. Endpoints were accidentally performed gastrointestinal fistula causing an emergency re-operation. The frequency of inadvertent gastroenteric fistulas using the two different techniques was calculated. Results. 822 publications were found when using the search terms: gastrostomy, gastrointestinal complications, and all child: 0–18 years. From these, 54 studies were extracted for this investigation. These studies reported a total of 4331 children undergoing gastrostomy operation, 1027 by using the laparoscopic technique and 3304 using the PEG technique. The number of serious gastrointestinal fistulas to colon or small bowel was 0% and .27%, respectively, P<.05. Conclusions. The results suggest that by performing laparoscopic gastrostomy in children it is possible to avoid the serious intestinal fistula complications caused by a blind puncture through the abdominal cavity when performing the PEG.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/507616
spellingShingle Madelen Lantz
Helena Hultin Larsson
Einar Arnbjörnsson
Literature Review Comparing Laparoscopic and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomies in a Pediatric Population
International Journal of Pediatrics
title Literature Review Comparing Laparoscopic and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomies in a Pediatric Population
title_full Literature Review Comparing Laparoscopic and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomies in a Pediatric Population
title_fullStr Literature Review Comparing Laparoscopic and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomies in a Pediatric Population
title_full_unstemmed Literature Review Comparing Laparoscopic and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomies in a Pediatric Population
title_short Literature Review Comparing Laparoscopic and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomies in a Pediatric Population
title_sort literature review comparing laparoscopic and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies in a pediatric population
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/507616
work_keys_str_mv AT madelenlantz literaturereviewcomparinglaparoscopicandpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomiesinapediatricpopulation
AT helenahultinlarsson literaturereviewcomparinglaparoscopicandpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomiesinapediatricpopulation
AT einararnbjornsson literaturereviewcomparinglaparoscopicandpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomiesinapediatricpopulation