Active learning in undergraduate classroom dental education- a scoping review.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Previous reviews on active learning in dental education have not comprehensibly summarized the research activity on this topic as they have largely focused on specific active learning strategies. This scoping review aimed to map the breadth and depth of the research...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arnaldo Perez, Jacqueline Green, Mohammad Moharrami, Silvia Gianoni-Capenakas, Maryam Kebbe, Seema Ganatra, Geoff Ball, Nazlee Sharmin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0293206&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540119495606272
author Arnaldo Perez
Jacqueline Green
Mohammad Moharrami
Silvia Gianoni-Capenakas
Maryam Kebbe
Seema Ganatra
Geoff Ball
Nazlee Sharmin
author_facet Arnaldo Perez
Jacqueline Green
Mohammad Moharrami
Silvia Gianoni-Capenakas
Maryam Kebbe
Seema Ganatra
Geoff Ball
Nazlee Sharmin
author_sort Arnaldo Perez
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Previous reviews on active learning in dental education have not comprehensibly summarized the research activity on this topic as they have largely focused on specific active learning strategies. This scoping review aimed to map the breadth and depth of the research activity on active learning strategies in undergraduate classroom dental education.<h4>Methods</h4>The review was guided by Arksey & O'Malley's multi-step framework and followed the PRISMA Extension Scoping Reviews guidelines. MEDLINE, ERIC, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched from January 2005 to October 2022. Peer-reviewed, primary research articles published in English were selected. Reference lists of relevant studies were verified to improve the search. Two trained researchers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-texts articles for eligibility and extracted the relevant data.<h4>Results</h4>In total, 93 studies were included in the review. All studies performed outcome evaluations, including reaction evaluation alone (n = 32; 34.4%), learning evaluation alone (n = 19; 20.4%), and reaction and learning evaluations combined (n = 42; 45.1%). Most studies used quantitative approaches (n = 85; 91.3%), performed post-intervention evaluations (n = 70; 75.3%), and measured student satisfaction (n = 73; 78.5%) and knowledge acquisition (n = 61; 65.6%) using direct and indirect (self-report) measures. Only 4 studies (4.3%) reported faculty data in addition to student data. Flipped learning, group discussion, problem-based learning, and team-based learning were the active learning strategies most frequently evaluated (≥6 studies). Overall, most studies found that active learning improved satisfaction and knowledge acquisition and was superior to traditional lectures based on direct and indirect outcome measures.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Active learning has the potential to enhance student learning in undergraduate classroom dental education; however, robust process and outcome evaluation designs are needed to demonstrate its effectiveness in this educational context. Further research is warranted to evaluate the impact of active learning strategies on skill development and behavioral change in order to support the competency-based approach in dental education.
format Article
id doaj-art-7d35ee7ac8e340eda8512964c1d42cd1
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-7d35ee7ac8e340eda8512964c1d42cd12025-02-05T05:32:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-011810e029320610.1371/journal.pone.0293206Active learning in undergraduate classroom dental education- a scoping review.Arnaldo PerezJacqueline GreenMohammad MoharramiSilvia Gianoni-CapenakasMaryam KebbeSeema GanatraGeoff BallNazlee Sharmin<h4>Introduction</h4>Previous reviews on active learning in dental education have not comprehensibly summarized the research activity on this topic as they have largely focused on specific active learning strategies. This scoping review aimed to map the breadth and depth of the research activity on active learning strategies in undergraduate classroom dental education.<h4>Methods</h4>The review was guided by Arksey & O'Malley's multi-step framework and followed the PRISMA Extension Scoping Reviews guidelines. MEDLINE, ERIC, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched from January 2005 to October 2022. Peer-reviewed, primary research articles published in English were selected. Reference lists of relevant studies were verified to improve the search. Two trained researchers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-texts articles for eligibility and extracted the relevant data.<h4>Results</h4>In total, 93 studies were included in the review. All studies performed outcome evaluations, including reaction evaluation alone (n = 32; 34.4%), learning evaluation alone (n = 19; 20.4%), and reaction and learning evaluations combined (n = 42; 45.1%). Most studies used quantitative approaches (n = 85; 91.3%), performed post-intervention evaluations (n = 70; 75.3%), and measured student satisfaction (n = 73; 78.5%) and knowledge acquisition (n = 61; 65.6%) using direct and indirect (self-report) measures. Only 4 studies (4.3%) reported faculty data in addition to student data. Flipped learning, group discussion, problem-based learning, and team-based learning were the active learning strategies most frequently evaluated (≥6 studies). Overall, most studies found that active learning improved satisfaction and knowledge acquisition and was superior to traditional lectures based on direct and indirect outcome measures.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Active learning has the potential to enhance student learning in undergraduate classroom dental education; however, robust process and outcome evaluation designs are needed to demonstrate its effectiveness in this educational context. Further research is warranted to evaluate the impact of active learning strategies on skill development and behavioral change in order to support the competency-based approach in dental education.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0293206&type=printable
spellingShingle Arnaldo Perez
Jacqueline Green
Mohammad Moharrami
Silvia Gianoni-Capenakas
Maryam Kebbe
Seema Ganatra
Geoff Ball
Nazlee Sharmin
Active learning in undergraduate classroom dental education- a scoping review.
PLoS ONE
title Active learning in undergraduate classroom dental education- a scoping review.
title_full Active learning in undergraduate classroom dental education- a scoping review.
title_fullStr Active learning in undergraduate classroom dental education- a scoping review.
title_full_unstemmed Active learning in undergraduate classroom dental education- a scoping review.
title_short Active learning in undergraduate classroom dental education- a scoping review.
title_sort active learning in undergraduate classroom dental education a scoping review
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0293206&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT arnaldoperez activelearninginundergraduateclassroomdentaleducationascopingreview
AT jacquelinegreen activelearninginundergraduateclassroomdentaleducationascopingreview
AT mohammadmoharrami activelearninginundergraduateclassroomdentaleducationascopingreview
AT silviagianonicapenakas activelearninginundergraduateclassroomdentaleducationascopingreview
AT maryamkebbe activelearninginundergraduateclassroomdentaleducationascopingreview
AT seemaganatra activelearninginundergraduateclassroomdentaleducationascopingreview
AT geoffball activelearninginundergraduateclassroomdentaleducationascopingreview
AT nazleesharmin activelearninginundergraduateclassroomdentaleducationascopingreview