A comparison of protocols for high-throughput weeds mapping

Increasing herbicide resistance in the US demands novel approaches to integrated weed management, including targeted chemical use and non-chemical methods. More targeted chemical applications and non-chemical alternative methods help expose weeds to multiple modes of action, decreasing the formation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joaquin J. Casanova, Nicolas T. Bergmann, Jessica E.R. Kalin, Garett C. Heineck, Ian C. Burke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-12-01
Series:Smart Agricultural Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525003090
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850118841140510720
author Joaquin J. Casanova
Nicolas T. Bergmann
Jessica E.R. Kalin
Garett C. Heineck
Ian C. Burke
author_facet Joaquin J. Casanova
Nicolas T. Bergmann
Jessica E.R. Kalin
Garett C. Heineck
Ian C. Burke
author_sort Joaquin J. Casanova
collection DOAJ
description Increasing herbicide resistance in the US demands novel approaches to integrated weed management, including targeted chemical use and non-chemical methods. More targeted chemical applications and non-chemical alternative methods help expose weeds to multiple modes of action, decreasing the formation of resistant populations. However, generating prescription maps and evaluating non-chemical methods require field-scale mapping of weeds. Typical methods for weeds mapping either involve laborious mapping on the ground or impractical low-altitude UAV imaging. Additionally, the literature describes an array of imaging techniques demonstrated in very select circumstances. To give clear guidelines for future research, this paper compares three imaging techniques, two weed count model types, and two ground validation methods (quadrat counts and seedbank counts) for remote weeds mapping on five sites experiencing infestations of different common weed species. Overall, the multispectral imaging techniques using Poisson count models and weed counts in quadrats as ground truth outperformed other methods and can be recommended as a pipeline for rapid mapping weeds in field crops. However, though seedbank density did not map well when using imagery, 50 seedbank samples were adequate for assessing seedbank.
format Article
id doaj-art-7cecc3a2adf94e3b8cf37eaa365c33b5
institution OA Journals
issn 2772-3755
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Smart Agricultural Technology
spelling doaj-art-7cecc3a2adf94e3b8cf37eaa365c33b52025-08-20T02:35:46ZengElsevierSmart Agricultural Technology2772-37552025-12-011210107610.1016/j.atech.2025.101076A comparison of protocols for high-throughput weeds mappingJoaquin J. Casanova0Nicolas T. Bergmann1Jessica E.R. Kalin2Garett C. Heineck3Ian C. Burke4USDA ARS, Pullman, WA, 99164, USAWSU Department of Crop and Soil Science, Pullman, WA, 99164, USAWSU Department of Crop and Soil Science, Pullman, WA, 99164, USAUSDA ARS, Prosser, WA, 99350, USAWSU Department of Crop and Soil Science, Pullman, WA, 99164, USAIncreasing herbicide resistance in the US demands novel approaches to integrated weed management, including targeted chemical use and non-chemical methods. More targeted chemical applications and non-chemical alternative methods help expose weeds to multiple modes of action, decreasing the formation of resistant populations. However, generating prescription maps and evaluating non-chemical methods require field-scale mapping of weeds. Typical methods for weeds mapping either involve laborious mapping on the ground or impractical low-altitude UAV imaging. Additionally, the literature describes an array of imaging techniques demonstrated in very select circumstances. To give clear guidelines for future research, this paper compares three imaging techniques, two weed count model types, and two ground validation methods (quadrat counts and seedbank counts) for remote weeds mapping on five sites experiencing infestations of different common weed species. Overall, the multispectral imaging techniques using Poisson count models and weed counts in quadrats as ground truth outperformed other methods and can be recommended as a pipeline for rapid mapping weeds in field crops. However, though seedbank density did not map well when using imagery, 50 seedbank samples were adequate for assessing seedbank.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525003090WeedsRemote sensingUAVComputer vision
spellingShingle Joaquin J. Casanova
Nicolas T. Bergmann
Jessica E.R. Kalin
Garett C. Heineck
Ian C. Burke
A comparison of protocols for high-throughput weeds mapping
Smart Agricultural Technology
Weeds
Remote sensing
UAV
Computer vision
title A comparison of protocols for high-throughput weeds mapping
title_full A comparison of protocols for high-throughput weeds mapping
title_fullStr A comparison of protocols for high-throughput weeds mapping
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of protocols for high-throughput weeds mapping
title_short A comparison of protocols for high-throughput weeds mapping
title_sort comparison of protocols for high throughput weeds mapping
topic Weeds
Remote sensing
UAV
Computer vision
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525003090
work_keys_str_mv AT joaquinjcasanova acomparisonofprotocolsforhighthroughputweedsmapping
AT nicolastbergmann acomparisonofprotocolsforhighthroughputweedsmapping
AT jessicaerkalin acomparisonofprotocolsforhighthroughputweedsmapping
AT garettcheineck acomparisonofprotocolsforhighthroughputweedsmapping
AT iancburke acomparisonofprotocolsforhighthroughputweedsmapping
AT joaquinjcasanova comparisonofprotocolsforhighthroughputweedsmapping
AT nicolastbergmann comparisonofprotocolsforhighthroughputweedsmapping
AT jessicaerkalin comparisonofprotocolsforhighthroughputweedsmapping
AT garettcheineck comparisonofprotocolsforhighthroughputweedsmapping
AT iancburke comparisonofprotocolsforhighthroughputweedsmapping