Patient adherence, satisfaction and changes in anthropometric parameters with e-health versus in-person monitoring in metabolic bariatric surgery patients: A study protocol for a systematic review and non-inferiority meta-analysis of cohort studies.

<h4>Background</h4>Obesity is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and associated with reduced life expectancy metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is the treatment indicated when patients are unable to lose weight through lifestyle changes and medication alone. However, more evidence...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maíra Ribas Goulart, Karine Elisa Schwarzer Schmidt, Gustavo Waclawovsky, Izabele Vian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313434
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540191853641728
author Maíra Ribas Goulart
Karine Elisa Schwarzer Schmidt
Gustavo Waclawovsky
Izabele Vian
author_facet Maíra Ribas Goulart
Karine Elisa Schwarzer Schmidt
Gustavo Waclawovsky
Izabele Vian
author_sort Maíra Ribas Goulart
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Obesity is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and associated with reduced life expectancy metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is the treatment indicated when patients are unable to lose weight through lifestyle changes and medication alone. However, more evidence is necessary to show non-inferiority of e-health compared to in-person monitoring with regard to important parameters for the success of surgical treatment of obesity such as anthropometric changes.<h4>Methods and analyses</h4>This review study will include cohort studies involving individuals with obesity and e-health or in-person patient monitoring before and after MBS. This study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42023491051). We will conduct searches in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE (Elsevier), Cochrane (CENTRAL), Web of Science, SCOPUS and CINAHL (EBSCO) and LILACS-VHL. We will also search databases in the gray literature. The primary outcomes will be changes in body mass index (BMI), body weight (kg) and body fat percentage (BF%) and patient adherence and satisfaction. The risk of bias of individual eligible studies will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the overall quality will be assessed using the GRADE tool. Our analyses will involve comparisons of mean differences or standardized mean differences across the groups using random-effects models and 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analyses will be performed with RStudio for Windows (v1.3.959) using R package meta (v3.6.1).<h4>Discussion and conclusion</h4>Our study can offer evidence that shows the benefits of e-health patient monitoring of individuals undergoing MBS and supports scaling up this care modality to reduce waiting times and health care costs.
format Article
id doaj-art-7c258ea538fc40d3990e20875b08c1d2
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-7c258ea538fc40d3990e20875b08c1d22025-02-05T05:32:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01201e031343410.1371/journal.pone.0313434Patient adherence, satisfaction and changes in anthropometric parameters with e-health versus in-person monitoring in metabolic bariatric surgery patients: A study protocol for a systematic review and non-inferiority meta-analysis of cohort studies.Maíra Ribas GoulartKarine Elisa Schwarzer SchmidtGustavo WaclawovskyIzabele Vian<h4>Background</h4>Obesity is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and associated with reduced life expectancy metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is the treatment indicated when patients are unable to lose weight through lifestyle changes and medication alone. However, more evidence is necessary to show non-inferiority of e-health compared to in-person monitoring with regard to important parameters for the success of surgical treatment of obesity such as anthropometric changes.<h4>Methods and analyses</h4>This review study will include cohort studies involving individuals with obesity and e-health or in-person patient monitoring before and after MBS. This study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42023491051). We will conduct searches in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE (Elsevier), Cochrane (CENTRAL), Web of Science, SCOPUS and CINAHL (EBSCO) and LILACS-VHL. We will also search databases in the gray literature. The primary outcomes will be changes in body mass index (BMI), body weight (kg) and body fat percentage (BF%) and patient adherence and satisfaction. The risk of bias of individual eligible studies will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the overall quality will be assessed using the GRADE tool. Our analyses will involve comparisons of mean differences or standardized mean differences across the groups using random-effects models and 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analyses will be performed with RStudio for Windows (v1.3.959) using R package meta (v3.6.1).<h4>Discussion and conclusion</h4>Our study can offer evidence that shows the benefits of e-health patient monitoring of individuals undergoing MBS and supports scaling up this care modality to reduce waiting times and health care costs.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313434
spellingShingle Maíra Ribas Goulart
Karine Elisa Schwarzer Schmidt
Gustavo Waclawovsky
Izabele Vian
Patient adherence, satisfaction and changes in anthropometric parameters with e-health versus in-person monitoring in metabolic bariatric surgery patients: A study protocol for a systematic review and non-inferiority meta-analysis of cohort studies.
PLoS ONE
title Patient adherence, satisfaction and changes in anthropometric parameters with e-health versus in-person monitoring in metabolic bariatric surgery patients: A study protocol for a systematic review and non-inferiority meta-analysis of cohort studies.
title_full Patient adherence, satisfaction and changes in anthropometric parameters with e-health versus in-person monitoring in metabolic bariatric surgery patients: A study protocol for a systematic review and non-inferiority meta-analysis of cohort studies.
title_fullStr Patient adherence, satisfaction and changes in anthropometric parameters with e-health versus in-person monitoring in metabolic bariatric surgery patients: A study protocol for a systematic review and non-inferiority meta-analysis of cohort studies.
title_full_unstemmed Patient adherence, satisfaction and changes in anthropometric parameters with e-health versus in-person monitoring in metabolic bariatric surgery patients: A study protocol for a systematic review and non-inferiority meta-analysis of cohort studies.
title_short Patient adherence, satisfaction and changes in anthropometric parameters with e-health versus in-person monitoring in metabolic bariatric surgery patients: A study protocol for a systematic review and non-inferiority meta-analysis of cohort studies.
title_sort patient adherence satisfaction and changes in anthropometric parameters with e health versus in person monitoring in metabolic bariatric surgery patients a study protocol for a systematic review and non inferiority meta analysis of cohort studies
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313434
work_keys_str_mv AT mairaribasgoulart patientadherencesatisfactionandchangesinanthropometricparameterswithehealthversusinpersonmonitoringinmetabolicbariatricsurgerypatientsastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandnoninferioritymetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT karineelisaschwarzerschmidt patientadherencesatisfactionandchangesinanthropometricparameterswithehealthversusinpersonmonitoringinmetabolicbariatricsurgerypatientsastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandnoninferioritymetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT gustavowaclawovsky patientadherencesatisfactionandchangesinanthropometricparameterswithehealthversusinpersonmonitoringinmetabolicbariatricsurgerypatientsastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandnoninferioritymetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT izabelevian patientadherencesatisfactionandchangesinanthropometricparameterswithehealthversusinpersonmonitoringinmetabolicbariatricsurgerypatientsastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandnoninferioritymetaanalysisofcohortstudies