The Combination of Fat Distribution and BMI Redefines Obesity: Result From NHANES

ABSTRACT Background Body mass index (BMI) has well‐recognized limitations, particularly in the context of the ‘obesity paradox’, where higher BMI does not consistently evaluate adverse outcomes. These limitations underscore the need for alternative approaches. This study aimed to redefine obesity us...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liuqing Yang, Yizhong Ge, Qiankun Zhu, Qi Zhang, Lin Wang, Xin Wang, Yun Yang, Hanping Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-08-01
Series:Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.70013
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849229101859078144
author Liuqing Yang
Yizhong Ge
Qiankun Zhu
Qi Zhang
Lin Wang
Xin Wang
Yun Yang
Hanping Shi
author_facet Liuqing Yang
Yizhong Ge
Qiankun Zhu
Qi Zhang
Lin Wang
Xin Wang
Yun Yang
Hanping Shi
author_sort Liuqing Yang
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background Body mass index (BMI) has well‐recognized limitations, particularly in the context of the ‘obesity paradox’, where higher BMI does not consistently evaluate adverse outcomes. These limitations underscore the need for alternative approaches. This study aimed to redefine obesity using anthropometric indicators and to assess their prognostic value for mortality. Methods The original cohort included participants from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2006. Additional dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) data on fat distribution were sourced from NHANES 1999–2006 and 2011–2018. Ten fat distribution indicators were adopted to assess the fat distribution in the target population, including five centripetal obesity indicators, three global obesity indicators and two limb obesity indicators. All‐cause, cardiovascular‐specific and cancer‐specific mortality outcomes were examined using weighted Cox proportional hazards models. Logistic regression was employed to evaluate associations between fat distribution indicators and the prevalence of specific diseases. Results This study included 14 936 participants (weighted 152 823 236 participants, mean age: 45.56 ± 17.60 years) and two DXA‐assessed cohorts. Fat distribution indicators were correlated with various DXA‐defined fat components. All 10 indicators demonstrated significant associations with mortality. Notably, the relationship between centripetal obesity indicators and all‐cause mortality was approximately linear in both sexes. Centripetal obesity was also strongly associated with cardiovascular and cancer‐specific mortality (p < 0.001). Although fat distribution indicators were significantly linked to the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), they showed no clear association with cancer incidence. Individuals with obesity but without centripetal fat accumulation exhibited a similar or slightly higher mortality risk compared with those with normal BMI and no centripetal obesity. Conclusion Centripetal obesity indicators emerged as the strongest independent evaluators of mortality, regardless of BMI classification. These findings highlight the clinical value of incorporating fat distribution metrics alongside BMI to more accurately assess obesity‐related mortality risk.
format Article
id doaj-art-7bc5f998066a4d31b49e4ce212c3638d
institution Kabale University
issn 2190-5991
2190-6009
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
spelling doaj-art-7bc5f998066a4d31b49e4ce212c3638d2025-08-22T07:30:52ZengWileyJournal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle2190-59912190-60092025-08-01164n/an/a10.1002/jcsm.70013The Combination of Fat Distribution and BMI Redefines Obesity: Result From NHANESLiuqing Yang0Yizhong Ge1Qiankun Zhu2Qi Zhang3Lin Wang4Xin Wang5Yun Yang6Hanping Shi7Department of Clinical Nutrition Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing ChinaThe Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics Surgery Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute Beijing ChinaDepartment of Genetics Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USADepartment of General Surgery/Center for Cancer Nutrition and Metabolism Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing ChinaDepartment of General Surgery/Center for Cancer Nutrition and Metabolism Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing ChinaDepartment of Clinical Nutrition Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing ChinaKey Laboratory of Cancer FSMP for State Market Regulation Beijing ChinaABSTRACT Background Body mass index (BMI) has well‐recognized limitations, particularly in the context of the ‘obesity paradox’, where higher BMI does not consistently evaluate adverse outcomes. These limitations underscore the need for alternative approaches. This study aimed to redefine obesity using anthropometric indicators and to assess their prognostic value for mortality. Methods The original cohort included participants from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2006. Additional dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) data on fat distribution were sourced from NHANES 1999–2006 and 2011–2018. Ten fat distribution indicators were adopted to assess the fat distribution in the target population, including five centripetal obesity indicators, three global obesity indicators and two limb obesity indicators. All‐cause, cardiovascular‐specific and cancer‐specific mortality outcomes were examined using weighted Cox proportional hazards models. Logistic regression was employed to evaluate associations between fat distribution indicators and the prevalence of specific diseases. Results This study included 14 936 participants (weighted 152 823 236 participants, mean age: 45.56 ± 17.60 years) and two DXA‐assessed cohorts. Fat distribution indicators were correlated with various DXA‐defined fat components. All 10 indicators demonstrated significant associations with mortality. Notably, the relationship between centripetal obesity indicators and all‐cause mortality was approximately linear in both sexes. Centripetal obesity was also strongly associated with cardiovascular and cancer‐specific mortality (p < 0.001). Although fat distribution indicators were significantly linked to the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), they showed no clear association with cancer incidence. Individuals with obesity but without centripetal fat accumulation exhibited a similar or slightly higher mortality risk compared with those with normal BMI and no centripetal obesity. Conclusion Centripetal obesity indicators emerged as the strongest independent evaluators of mortality, regardless of BMI classification. These findings highlight the clinical value of incorporating fat distribution metrics alongside BMI to more accurately assess obesity‐related mortality risk.https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.70013BMIcentripetal obesityobesity
spellingShingle Liuqing Yang
Yizhong Ge
Qiankun Zhu
Qi Zhang
Lin Wang
Xin Wang
Yun Yang
Hanping Shi
The Combination of Fat Distribution and BMI Redefines Obesity: Result From NHANES
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
BMI
centripetal obesity
obesity
title The Combination of Fat Distribution and BMI Redefines Obesity: Result From NHANES
title_full The Combination of Fat Distribution and BMI Redefines Obesity: Result From NHANES
title_fullStr The Combination of Fat Distribution and BMI Redefines Obesity: Result From NHANES
title_full_unstemmed The Combination of Fat Distribution and BMI Redefines Obesity: Result From NHANES
title_short The Combination of Fat Distribution and BMI Redefines Obesity: Result From NHANES
title_sort combination of fat distribution and bmi redefines obesity result from nhanes
topic BMI
centripetal obesity
obesity
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.70013
work_keys_str_mv AT liuqingyang thecombinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT yizhongge thecombinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT qiankunzhu thecombinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT qizhang thecombinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT linwang thecombinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT xinwang thecombinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT yunyang thecombinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT hanpingshi thecombinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT liuqingyang combinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT yizhongge combinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT qiankunzhu combinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT qizhang combinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT linwang combinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT xinwang combinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT yunyang combinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes
AT hanpingshi combinationoffatdistributionandbmiredefinesobesityresultfromnhanes