Corn Response Across Plant Densities and Row Configurations for Different Moisture Environments

Corn (Zea mays L.) production in the Southeast can be negatively impacted by erratic summer rainfall and drought-prone, coarse-textured soils, but irrigation combined with conservation tillage and cover crops may support greater plant densities arranged in different row configurations to improve yie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kipling S. Balkcom, Kira L. Bowen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:International Journal of Agronomy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4518062
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550359722098688
author Kipling S. Balkcom
Kira L. Bowen
author_facet Kipling S. Balkcom
Kira L. Bowen
author_sort Kipling S. Balkcom
collection DOAJ
description Corn (Zea mays L.) production in the Southeast can be negatively impacted by erratic summer rainfall and drought-prone, coarse-textured soils, but irrigation combined with conservation tillage and cover crops may support greater plant densities arranged in different row configurations to improve yield. We examined five site-years of data across two soil types in Alabama to compare corn yields in a conservation system across three plant densities for single- and twin-row configurations in dryland and irrigated moisture regimes. Treatments were arranged with a split plot treatment restriction in a RCB design with three replications. Main plots were irrigation level (no irrigation and irrigation), and subplots were a factorial arrangement of three plant densities (5.9, 7.4, and 8.9 plants m−2) and row configurations (single and twin). A moisture environment (low and moderate) variable, defined by growing season rainfall, was used to average over site-years. In general, irrigation in the moderate-moisture environment improved each measured variable (plant height, stover yield, corn yield, and test weight) and decreased grain N concentration and aflatoxin levels compared to the low-moisture environment with no irrigation. Benefits of increased rainfall and irrigation to reduce soil moisture stress across drought-prone soils were evident. Pooled results across all site-years indicated no yield response as plant density increased, but greater yields were observed with the greatest plant densities in the moderate-moisture environments. No advantage for twin-row corn production was observed across five site-years in Alabama, which indicates either row configuration can be successfully adopted.
format Article
id doaj-art-7ba91a6db92842b2b55fd718e1a48175
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8159
1687-8167
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Agronomy
spelling doaj-art-7ba91a6db92842b2b55fd718e1a481752025-02-03T06:06:55ZengWileyInternational Journal of Agronomy1687-81591687-81672020-01-01202010.1155/2020/45180624518062Corn Response Across Plant Densities and Row Configurations for Different Moisture EnvironmentsKipling S. Balkcom0Kira L. Bowen1USDA-ARS, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, 411 S. Donahue Dr., Auburn, AL 36832-3439, USADepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, 209 Rouse Bldg., Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5412, USACorn (Zea mays L.) production in the Southeast can be negatively impacted by erratic summer rainfall and drought-prone, coarse-textured soils, but irrigation combined with conservation tillage and cover crops may support greater plant densities arranged in different row configurations to improve yield. We examined five site-years of data across two soil types in Alabama to compare corn yields in a conservation system across three plant densities for single- and twin-row configurations in dryland and irrigated moisture regimes. Treatments were arranged with a split plot treatment restriction in a RCB design with three replications. Main plots were irrigation level (no irrigation and irrigation), and subplots were a factorial arrangement of three plant densities (5.9, 7.4, and 8.9 plants m−2) and row configurations (single and twin). A moisture environment (low and moderate) variable, defined by growing season rainfall, was used to average over site-years. In general, irrigation in the moderate-moisture environment improved each measured variable (plant height, stover yield, corn yield, and test weight) and decreased grain N concentration and aflatoxin levels compared to the low-moisture environment with no irrigation. Benefits of increased rainfall and irrigation to reduce soil moisture stress across drought-prone soils were evident. Pooled results across all site-years indicated no yield response as plant density increased, but greater yields were observed with the greatest plant densities in the moderate-moisture environments. No advantage for twin-row corn production was observed across five site-years in Alabama, which indicates either row configuration can be successfully adopted.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4518062
spellingShingle Kipling S. Balkcom
Kira L. Bowen
Corn Response Across Plant Densities and Row Configurations for Different Moisture Environments
International Journal of Agronomy
title Corn Response Across Plant Densities and Row Configurations for Different Moisture Environments
title_full Corn Response Across Plant Densities and Row Configurations for Different Moisture Environments
title_fullStr Corn Response Across Plant Densities and Row Configurations for Different Moisture Environments
title_full_unstemmed Corn Response Across Plant Densities and Row Configurations for Different Moisture Environments
title_short Corn Response Across Plant Densities and Row Configurations for Different Moisture Environments
title_sort corn response across plant densities and row configurations for different moisture environments
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4518062
work_keys_str_mv AT kiplingsbalkcom cornresponseacrossplantdensitiesandrowconfigurationsfordifferentmoistureenvironments
AT kiralbowen cornresponseacrossplantdensitiesandrowconfigurationsfordifferentmoistureenvironments