Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review

# Background When treating runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP), clinicians aim to reduce patients' symptoms, such as pain and discomfort. Running retraining techniques (RRT) and neuromuscular exercises (NME) are key interventions to achieve these goals. # Purpose This scoping review exami...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miguel Farraj, Thomas Guilhem, Joachim Van Cant, Alexandre Rambaud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North American Sports Medicine Institute 2025-08-01
Series:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.141861
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849706602086531072
author Miguel Farraj
Thomas Guilhem
Joachim Van Cant
Alexandre Rambaud
author_facet Miguel Farraj
Thomas Guilhem
Joachim Van Cant
Alexandre Rambaud
author_sort Miguel Farraj
collection DOAJ
description # Background When treating runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP), clinicians aim to reduce patients' symptoms, such as pain and discomfort. Running retraining techniques (RRT) and neuromuscular exercises (NME) are key interventions to achieve these goals. # Purpose This scoping review examined the use of RRT and NME, either combined or standalone, in runners with PFP. # Study design Scoping review # Methods Databases searched included MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies and extracted data. The scoping review followed the PRISMA-SCR framework, using population, concept, and context criteria. The population included recreational to professional runners over 18 years with PFP, excluding those involved in any sport other than running~~.~~, as well as those with prior knee surgeries, the history or presence of other knee pathologies, or pediatric populations. The review focused on studies utilizing NME or RRT for PFP treatment, adhering to ACSM guidelines and excluding studies only providing study protocols. Exercise reporting was assessed using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template. NME protocols were analyzed using the FITT framework (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type). RRT protocols were evaluated by session frequency, start timing, clinician input, cadence, feedback, footwear use, speed changes, self-rehabilitation, and progression. # Results Fifteen studies were reviewed. The timing and complementarity of RRT with NME were often absent or poorly defined. NME mainly focused on single-leg squats in seven protocols, with forward lunges, step-downs, and trunk-rotating squats in three studies each. These exercises emphasized trunk inclination and gluteal activation, with variations in feedback, sets, reps, and progression. RRT treatment ranged from a single 10-minute retraining session to 12 weekly sessions. Cadence increase was addressed in six studies, dynamic valgus in four, with most feedback being auditory/visual. Minimalist shoes were used in two studies, and three standardized running speed. # Conclusion A notable variability exists in interventions for PFP in runners, especially in the timing and complementarity of RRT and NME. A standardized reporting system is needed to better analyze study protocol implementation. # Level of Evidence N/A
format Article
id doaj-art-7b0f25e1f1e04375bb8564c641b8e5f8
institution DOAJ
issn 2159-2896
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher North American Sports Medicine Institute
record_format Article
series International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
spelling doaj-art-7b0f25e1f1e04375bb8564c641b8e5f82025-08-20T03:16:08ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962025-08-0120810.26603/001c.141861Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping ReviewMiguel FarrajThomas GuilhemJoachim Van CantAlexandre Rambaud# Background When treating runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP), clinicians aim to reduce patients' symptoms, such as pain and discomfort. Running retraining techniques (RRT) and neuromuscular exercises (NME) are key interventions to achieve these goals. # Purpose This scoping review examined the use of RRT and NME, either combined or standalone, in runners with PFP. # Study design Scoping review # Methods Databases searched included MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies and extracted data. The scoping review followed the PRISMA-SCR framework, using population, concept, and context criteria. The population included recreational to professional runners over 18 years with PFP, excluding those involved in any sport other than running~~.~~, as well as those with prior knee surgeries, the history or presence of other knee pathologies, or pediatric populations. The review focused on studies utilizing NME or RRT for PFP treatment, adhering to ACSM guidelines and excluding studies only providing study protocols. Exercise reporting was assessed using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template. NME protocols were analyzed using the FITT framework (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type). RRT protocols were evaluated by session frequency, start timing, clinician input, cadence, feedback, footwear use, speed changes, self-rehabilitation, and progression. # Results Fifteen studies were reviewed. The timing and complementarity of RRT with NME were often absent or poorly defined. NME mainly focused on single-leg squats in seven protocols, with forward lunges, step-downs, and trunk-rotating squats in three studies each. These exercises emphasized trunk inclination and gluteal activation, with variations in feedback, sets, reps, and progression. RRT treatment ranged from a single 10-minute retraining session to 12 weekly sessions. Cadence increase was addressed in six studies, dynamic valgus in four, with most feedback being auditory/visual. Minimalist shoes were used in two studies, and three standardized running speed. # Conclusion A notable variability exists in interventions for PFP in runners, especially in the timing and complementarity of RRT and NME. A standardized reporting system is needed to better analyze study protocol implementation. # Level of Evidence N/Ahttps://doi.org/10.26603/001c.141861
spellingShingle Miguel Farraj
Thomas Guilhem
Joachim Van Cant
Alexandre Rambaud
Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
title Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review
title_full Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review
title_short Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review
title_sort running retraining technique and neuromuscular exercises in runners with patellofemoral pain a scoping review
url https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.141861
work_keys_str_mv AT miguelfarraj runningretrainingtechniqueandneuromuscularexercisesinrunnerswithpatellofemoralpainascopingreview
AT thomasguilhem runningretrainingtechniqueandneuromuscularexercisesinrunnerswithpatellofemoralpainascopingreview
AT joachimvancant runningretrainingtechniqueandneuromuscularexercisesinrunnerswithpatellofemoralpainascopingreview
AT alexandrerambaud runningretrainingtechniqueandneuromuscularexercisesinrunnerswithpatellofemoralpainascopingreview