Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study

Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of three tests—radial pulse palpation, an electronic blood pressure monitor and a handheld single-lead ECG device—for opportunistic screening for unknown atrial fibrillation (AF).Design We performed a diagnostic accuracy study in the intention-to-screen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wim A M Lucassen, Henk C P M van Weert, Bjorn Winkens, Henri E J H Stoffers, J André Knottnerus, Steven B Uittenbogaart, Nicole Verbiest-van Gurp, Petra M G Erkens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e059172.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584136441724928
author Wim A M Lucassen
Henk C P M van Weert
Bjorn Winkens
Henri E J H Stoffers
J André Knottnerus
Steven B Uittenbogaart
Nicole Verbiest-van Gurp
Petra M G Erkens
author_facet Wim A M Lucassen
Henk C P M van Weert
Bjorn Winkens
Henri E J H Stoffers
J André Knottnerus
Steven B Uittenbogaart
Nicole Verbiest-van Gurp
Petra M G Erkens
author_sort Wim A M Lucassen
collection DOAJ
description Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of three tests—radial pulse palpation, an electronic blood pressure monitor and a handheld single-lead ECG device—for opportunistic screening for unknown atrial fibrillation (AF).Design We performed a diagnostic accuracy study in the intention-to-screen arm of a cluster randomised controlled trial aimed at opportunistic screening for AF in general practice. We performed radial pulse palpation, followed by electronic blood pressure measurement (WatchBP Home A) and handheld ECG (MyDiagnostick) in random order. If one or more index tests were positive, we performed a 12-lead ECG at shortest notice. Similarly, to limit verification bias, a random sample of patients with three negative index tests received this reference test. Additionally, we analysed the dataset using multiple imputation. We present pooled diagnostic parameters.Setting 47 general practices participated between September 2015 and August 2018.Participants In the electronic medical record system of the participating general practices (n=47), we randomly marked 200 patients of ≥65 years without AF. When they visited the practice for any reason, we invited them to participate. Exclusion criteria were terminal illness, inability to give informed consent or visit the practice or having a pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.Outcomes Diagnostic accuracy of individual tests and test combinations to detect unknown AF.Results We included 4339 patients; 0.8% showed new AF. Sensitivity and specificity were 62.8% (range 43.1%–69.7%) and 91.8% (91.7%–91.8%) for radial pulse palpation, 70.0% (49.0%–80.6%) and 96.5% (96.3%–96.7%) for electronic blood pressure measurement and 90.1% (60.8%–100%) and 97.9% (97.8%–97.9%) for handheld ECG, respectively. Positive predictive values were 5.8% (5.3%–6.1%), 13.8% (12.2%–14.8%) and 25.2% (24.2%–25.8%), respectively. All negative predictive values were ≥99.7%.Conclusion In detecting AF, electronic blood pressure measurement (WatchBP Home A), but especially handheld ECG (MyDiagnostick) showed better diagnostic accuracy than radial pulse palpation.Trial registration number Netherlands Trial Register No. NL4776 (old NTR4914).
format Article
id doaj-art-7ae7bb44fee74bb6950ce41720577ed0
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-7ae7bb44fee74bb6950ce41720577ed02025-01-27T15:50:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-06-0112610.1136/bmjopen-2021-059172Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy studyWim A M Lucassen0Henk C P M van Weert1Bjorn Winkens2Henri E J H Stoffers3J André Knottnerus4Steven B Uittenbogaart5Nicole Verbiest-van Gurp6Petra M G Erkens7Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, NetherlandsAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands4 Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Family Medicine, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of General Practice, CAPHRI, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 9 Meibergdreef, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlandsdoctoral studentclinical epidemiologistObjective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of three tests—radial pulse palpation, an electronic blood pressure monitor and a handheld single-lead ECG device—for opportunistic screening for unknown atrial fibrillation (AF).Design We performed a diagnostic accuracy study in the intention-to-screen arm of a cluster randomised controlled trial aimed at opportunistic screening for AF in general practice. We performed radial pulse palpation, followed by electronic blood pressure measurement (WatchBP Home A) and handheld ECG (MyDiagnostick) in random order. If one or more index tests were positive, we performed a 12-lead ECG at shortest notice. Similarly, to limit verification bias, a random sample of patients with three negative index tests received this reference test. Additionally, we analysed the dataset using multiple imputation. We present pooled diagnostic parameters.Setting 47 general practices participated between September 2015 and August 2018.Participants In the electronic medical record system of the participating general practices (n=47), we randomly marked 200 patients of ≥65 years without AF. When they visited the practice for any reason, we invited them to participate. Exclusion criteria were terminal illness, inability to give informed consent or visit the practice or having a pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.Outcomes Diagnostic accuracy of individual tests and test combinations to detect unknown AF.Results We included 4339 patients; 0.8% showed new AF. Sensitivity and specificity were 62.8% (range 43.1%–69.7%) and 91.8% (91.7%–91.8%) for radial pulse palpation, 70.0% (49.0%–80.6%) and 96.5% (96.3%–96.7%) for electronic blood pressure measurement and 90.1% (60.8%–100%) and 97.9% (97.8%–97.9%) for handheld ECG, respectively. Positive predictive values were 5.8% (5.3%–6.1%), 13.8% (12.2%–14.8%) and 25.2% (24.2%–25.8%), respectively. All negative predictive values were ≥99.7%.Conclusion In detecting AF, electronic blood pressure measurement (WatchBP Home A), but especially handheld ECG (MyDiagnostick) showed better diagnostic accuracy than radial pulse palpation.Trial registration number Netherlands Trial Register No. NL4776 (old NTR4914).https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e059172.full
spellingShingle Wim A M Lucassen
Henk C P M van Weert
Bjorn Winkens
Henri E J H Stoffers
J André Knottnerus
Steven B Uittenbogaart
Nicole Verbiest-van Gurp
Petra M G Erkens
Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study
BMJ Open
title Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_full Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_fullStr Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_full_unstemmed Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_short Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_sort detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single lead electrocardiography a diagnostic accuracy study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e059172.full
work_keys_str_mv AT wimamlucassen detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT henkcpmvanweert detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT bjornwinkens detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT henriejhstoffers detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT jandreknottnerus detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT stevenbuittenbogaart detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT nicoleverbiestvangurp detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT petramgerkens detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy