Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study
Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of three tests—radial pulse palpation, an electronic blood pressure monitor and a handheld single-lead ECG device—for opportunistic screening for unknown atrial fibrillation (AF).Design We performed a diagnostic accuracy study in the intention-to-screen...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022-06-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e059172.full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832584136441724928 |
---|---|
author | Wim A M Lucassen Henk C P M van Weert Bjorn Winkens Henri E J H Stoffers J André Knottnerus Steven B Uittenbogaart Nicole Verbiest-van Gurp Petra M G Erkens |
author_facet | Wim A M Lucassen Henk C P M van Weert Bjorn Winkens Henri E J H Stoffers J André Knottnerus Steven B Uittenbogaart Nicole Verbiest-van Gurp Petra M G Erkens |
author_sort | Wim A M Lucassen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of three tests—radial pulse palpation, an electronic blood pressure monitor and a handheld single-lead ECG device—for opportunistic screening for unknown atrial fibrillation (AF).Design We performed a diagnostic accuracy study in the intention-to-screen arm of a cluster randomised controlled trial aimed at opportunistic screening for AF in general practice. We performed radial pulse palpation, followed by electronic blood pressure measurement (WatchBP Home A) and handheld ECG (MyDiagnostick) in random order. If one or more index tests were positive, we performed a 12-lead ECG at shortest notice. Similarly, to limit verification bias, a random sample of patients with three negative index tests received this reference test. Additionally, we analysed the dataset using multiple imputation. We present pooled diagnostic parameters.Setting 47 general practices participated between September 2015 and August 2018.Participants In the electronic medical record system of the participating general practices (n=47), we randomly marked 200 patients of ≥65 years without AF. When they visited the practice for any reason, we invited them to participate. Exclusion criteria were terminal illness, inability to give informed consent or visit the practice or having a pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.Outcomes Diagnostic accuracy of individual tests and test combinations to detect unknown AF.Results We included 4339 patients; 0.8% showed new AF. Sensitivity and specificity were 62.8% (range 43.1%–69.7%) and 91.8% (91.7%–91.8%) for radial pulse palpation, 70.0% (49.0%–80.6%) and 96.5% (96.3%–96.7%) for electronic blood pressure measurement and 90.1% (60.8%–100%) and 97.9% (97.8%–97.9%) for handheld ECG, respectively. Positive predictive values were 5.8% (5.3%–6.1%), 13.8% (12.2%–14.8%) and 25.2% (24.2%–25.8%), respectively. All negative predictive values were ≥99.7%.Conclusion In detecting AF, electronic blood pressure measurement (WatchBP Home A), but especially handheld ECG (MyDiagnostick) showed better diagnostic accuracy than radial pulse palpation.Trial registration number Netherlands Trial Register No. NL4776 (old NTR4914). |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-7ae7bb44fee74bb6950ce41720577ed0 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2044-6055 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | Article |
series | BMJ Open |
spelling | doaj-art-7ae7bb44fee74bb6950ce41720577ed02025-01-27T15:50:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-06-0112610.1136/bmjopen-2021-059172Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy studyWim A M Lucassen0Henk C P M van Weert1Bjorn Winkens2Henri E J H Stoffers3J André Knottnerus4Steven B Uittenbogaart5Nicole Verbiest-van Gurp6Petra M G Erkens7Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, NetherlandsAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands4 Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Family Medicine, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of General Practice, CAPHRI, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 9 Meibergdreef, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlandsdoctoral studentclinical epidemiologistObjective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of three tests—radial pulse palpation, an electronic blood pressure monitor and a handheld single-lead ECG device—for opportunistic screening for unknown atrial fibrillation (AF).Design We performed a diagnostic accuracy study in the intention-to-screen arm of a cluster randomised controlled trial aimed at opportunistic screening for AF in general practice. We performed radial pulse palpation, followed by electronic blood pressure measurement (WatchBP Home A) and handheld ECG (MyDiagnostick) in random order. If one or more index tests were positive, we performed a 12-lead ECG at shortest notice. Similarly, to limit verification bias, a random sample of patients with three negative index tests received this reference test. Additionally, we analysed the dataset using multiple imputation. We present pooled diagnostic parameters.Setting 47 general practices participated between September 2015 and August 2018.Participants In the electronic medical record system of the participating general practices (n=47), we randomly marked 200 patients of ≥65 years without AF. When they visited the practice for any reason, we invited them to participate. Exclusion criteria were terminal illness, inability to give informed consent or visit the practice or having a pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.Outcomes Diagnostic accuracy of individual tests and test combinations to detect unknown AF.Results We included 4339 patients; 0.8% showed new AF. Sensitivity and specificity were 62.8% (range 43.1%–69.7%) and 91.8% (91.7%–91.8%) for radial pulse palpation, 70.0% (49.0%–80.6%) and 96.5% (96.3%–96.7%) for electronic blood pressure measurement and 90.1% (60.8%–100%) and 97.9% (97.8%–97.9%) for handheld ECG, respectively. Positive predictive values were 5.8% (5.3%–6.1%), 13.8% (12.2%–14.8%) and 25.2% (24.2%–25.8%), respectively. All negative predictive values were ≥99.7%.Conclusion In detecting AF, electronic blood pressure measurement (WatchBP Home A), but especially handheld ECG (MyDiagnostick) showed better diagnostic accuracy than radial pulse palpation.Trial registration number Netherlands Trial Register No. NL4776 (old NTR4914).https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e059172.full |
spellingShingle | Wim A M Lucassen Henk C P M van Weert Bjorn Winkens Henri E J H Stoffers J André Knottnerus Steven B Uittenbogaart Nicole Verbiest-van Gurp Petra M G Erkens Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study BMJ Open |
title | Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study |
title_full | Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study |
title_fullStr | Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study |
title_short | Detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation, electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single-lead electrocardiography: a diagnostic accuracy study |
title_sort | detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care with radial pulse palpation electronic blood pressure measurement and handheld single lead electrocardiography a diagnostic accuracy study |
url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e059172.full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wimamlucassen detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy AT henkcpmvanweert detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy AT bjornwinkens detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy AT henriejhstoffers detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy AT jandreknottnerus detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy AT stevenbuittenbogaart detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy AT nicoleverbiestvangurp detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy AT petramgerkens detectionofatrialfibrillationinprimarycarewithradialpulsepalpationelectronicbloodpressuremeasurementandhandheldsingleleadelectrocardiographyadiagnosticaccuracystudy |