A call to action to address critical flaws and bias in laboratory animal experiments and preclinical research
Abstract During the design of hypothesis-driven, comparative laboratory animal experiments, investigators must control for cage effects, ensure full blinding and full randomization while adhering to established experimental designs, notably variations of the Completely Randomized Design and the Rand...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Hugh G. G. Townsend, Klaus Osterrieder, Murray D. Jelinski, Douglas W. Morck, Cheryl L. Waldner, William R. Cox, Volker Gerdts, Andrew A. Potter, Lorne A. Babiuk, James C. Cross |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15935-4 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comparison of K-solutions of rectangular flaw with semi-elliptical flaw for PWSCC growth analysis
by: Kiminobu HOJO, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
SHAM TRANSACTIONS AS TRANSACTIONS WITH FLAW IN THE WILL
by: V. M. Platonov
Published: (2014-03-01) -
Effect of pressure acting on the flaw surface on plastic collapse strength for pipes with circumferential surface flaws
by: Hideo MACHIDA
Published: (2025-07-01) -
FLAW'S RECONSTRUCTION IN MULTI-LAYERS COMPOSITES
by: A.N. SOLOVIEV, et al.
Published: (2009-06-01) -
Editorial: Is tourism a flawed model?
by: Ian Seymour Yeoman
Published: (2025-04-01)