Integrative review in PhD admissions: A case study of efficiently minimizing bias while maximizing the student narrative.
Developing scientific and medical innovations continue to be limited by lack of diverse representation among leaders and learners. One key gateway for these goals is graduate school admissions, but comprehensive consideration of all components of applications, which is needed to reduce systemic bias...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Minerva A Orellana, Danielle J Beetler, Carmen J Silvano, Ryan Wuertz, Jennifer L Weisbrod, Lewis R Roberts, Anthony J Windebank, Felicity T Enders, Marina R Walther-Antonio |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323426 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Integrative review in PhD admissions: A case study of efficiently minimizing bias while maximizing the student narrative
by: Minerva A. Orellana, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
151 Transitioning PhD Journal Club and works-in-progress sessions to a translational science-focused format: Enhancing relevance and increasing engagement
by: Carmen Silvano, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Dr. PhD
by: Deepak Malhotra, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
The PhD ‘Dragon’
by: Magne Espeland
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Your PhD Coach: how to get the PhD experience you want/
by: Gill Jeff, Medd Will
Published: (2013)