Use of Condition-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials among Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review
Background. This paper aimed to identify condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical trials among people with wrist osteoarthritis and summarise empirical peer-reviewed evidence supporting their reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change. Methods. A systematic rev...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in Orthopedics |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/273421 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832556427778981888 |
---|---|
author | Steven M. McPhail Karl S. Bagraith Mandy Schippers Paula J. Wells Anna Hatton |
author_facet | Steven M. McPhail Karl S. Bagraith Mandy Schippers Paula J. Wells Anna Hatton |
author_sort | Steven M. McPhail |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background. This paper aimed to identify condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical trials among people with wrist osteoarthritis and summarise empirical peer-reviewed evidence supporting their reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change. Methods. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials among people with wrist osteoarthritis was undertaken. Studies reporting reliability, validity, or responsiveness were identified using a systematic reverse citation trail audit procedure. Psychometric properties of the instruments were examined against predefined criteria and summarised. Results. Thirteen clinical trials met inclusion criteria. The most common patient-reported outcome was the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH). The DASH, the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), the Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM), and the Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) had evidence supporting their reliability, validity, and responsiveness. A post-hoc review of excluded studies revealed the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index as another suitable instrument that had favourable reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Conclusions. The DASH, MHQ, and AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index instruments were supported by the most favourable empirical evidence for validity, reliability, and responsiveness. The PEM and PRWE also had favourable empirical evidence reported for these elements. Further psychometric testing of these instruments among people with wrist osteoarthritis is warranted. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-79ba51c5551d47efb389251d47a20d4f |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-3464 2090-3472 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Advances in Orthopedics |
spelling | doaj-art-79ba51c5551d47efb389251d47a20d4f2025-02-03T05:45:25ZengWileyAdvances in Orthopedics2090-34642090-34722012-01-01201210.1155/2012/273421273421Use of Condition-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials among Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis: A Systematic ReviewSteven M. McPhail0Karl S. Bagraith1Mandy Schippers2Paula J. Wells3Anna Hatton4Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Queensland Health, Cnr of Ipswich Road and Cornwall Street, Buranda, Brisbane, QLD 4102, AustraliaOccupational Therapy Department and Centre for Allied Health Research, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, AustraliaCentre for Functioning and Health Research, Queensland Health, Cnr of Ipswich Road and Cornwall Street, Buranda, Brisbane, QLD 4102, AustraliaSchool of Public Health and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059, AustraliaCentre for Functioning and Health Research, Queensland Health, Cnr of Ipswich Road and Cornwall Street, Buranda, Brisbane, QLD 4102, AustraliaBackground. This paper aimed to identify condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical trials among people with wrist osteoarthritis and summarise empirical peer-reviewed evidence supporting their reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change. Methods. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials among people with wrist osteoarthritis was undertaken. Studies reporting reliability, validity, or responsiveness were identified using a systematic reverse citation trail audit procedure. Psychometric properties of the instruments were examined against predefined criteria and summarised. Results. Thirteen clinical trials met inclusion criteria. The most common patient-reported outcome was the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH). The DASH, the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), the Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM), and the Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) had evidence supporting their reliability, validity, and responsiveness. A post-hoc review of excluded studies revealed the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index as another suitable instrument that had favourable reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Conclusions. The DASH, MHQ, and AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index instruments were supported by the most favourable empirical evidence for validity, reliability, and responsiveness. The PEM and PRWE also had favourable empirical evidence reported for these elements. Further psychometric testing of these instruments among people with wrist osteoarthritis is warranted.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/273421 |
spellingShingle | Steven M. McPhail Karl S. Bagraith Mandy Schippers Paula J. Wells Anna Hatton Use of Condition-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials among Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review Advances in Orthopedics |
title | Use of Condition-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials among Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Use of Condition-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials among Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Use of Condition-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials among Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of Condition-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials among Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Use of Condition-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials among Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | use of condition specific patient reported outcome measures in clinical trials among patients with wrist osteoarthritis a systematic review |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/273421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stevenmmcphail useofconditionspecificpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinclinicaltrialsamongpatientswithwristosteoarthritisasystematicreview AT karlsbagraith useofconditionspecificpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinclinicaltrialsamongpatientswithwristosteoarthritisasystematicreview AT mandyschippers useofconditionspecificpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinclinicaltrialsamongpatientswithwristosteoarthritisasystematicreview AT paulajwells useofconditionspecificpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinclinicaltrialsamongpatientswithwristosteoarthritisasystematicreview AT annahatton useofconditionspecificpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinclinicaltrialsamongpatientswithwristosteoarthritisasystematicreview |