Case Report: Practical approach to unmask unspecific adverse effects under lipid-lowering medication

The nocebo effect, driven by negative expectations rather than pharmacological mechanisms, contributes significantly to medication non-adherence, particularly in lipid-lowering therapy. Up to 50% of reported statin-related adverse effects may result from nocebo responses, leading to unnecessary disc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Büttner, Gunther Hartmann, Martin Coenen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1604129/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850254237352591360
author Thomas Büttner
Gunther Hartmann
Martin Coenen
author_facet Thomas Büttner
Gunther Hartmann
Martin Coenen
author_sort Thomas Büttner
collection DOAJ
description The nocebo effect, driven by negative expectations rather than pharmacological mechanisms, contributes significantly to medication non-adherence, particularly in lipid-lowering therapy. Up to 50% of reported statin-related adverse effects may result from nocebo responses, leading to unnecessary discontinuation and increased cardiovascular risk. Blinded provocation tests may offer a solution for the differentiation of true drug intolerance from nocebo-driven symptoms. Although this methodology is well-established in experimental studies, it has not been transferred to routine clinical practice so far. We present a 65-year-old female with hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular risk factors who experienced recurrent, dose-dependent left-sided lower abdominal pain with different lipid-lowering drugs. These symptoms prompted repeated and ultimately continuous treatment discontinuations, each followed by resolution of complaints. Despite extensive evaluations, no organic cause was found. To assess the role of nocebo effects, a six-week single-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover provocation test with a commercially available placebo preparation and atorvastatin placed in neutral pill containers was conducted. Upon initiation of the provocation phase, the patient experienced similar intermittent symptoms under both treatments. The pain ratings on a numeric rating scale did not significantly differ during placebo (mean: 2.75) and atorvastatin administration (mean: 3.26), suggesting that these symptoms were not pharmacologically induced. Following information of the patient, atorvastatin therapy could be continued. During continued intake over several weeks, symptoms further diminished, reinforcing the therapeutic value of addressing nocebo effects. This case report provides for the first time the structured and detailed step-by-step description of a pragmatic approach for a prospective blinded, placebo-controlled provocation testing that can directly be implemented in routine clinical practice. This method enables the distinction of true drug intolerance from nocebo effects, thereby enabling necessary therapies and highlighting its diagnostic and therapeutic potential.
format Article
id doaj-art-78c1bb0016cb4e37b35b08f4e9fc2d27
institution OA Journals
issn 2297-055X
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj-art-78c1bb0016cb4e37b35b08f4e9fc2d272025-08-20T01:57:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2025-05-011210.3389/fcvm.2025.16041291604129Case Report: Practical approach to unmask unspecific adverse effects under lipid-lowering medicationThomas BüttnerGunther HartmannMartin CoenenThe nocebo effect, driven by negative expectations rather than pharmacological mechanisms, contributes significantly to medication non-adherence, particularly in lipid-lowering therapy. Up to 50% of reported statin-related adverse effects may result from nocebo responses, leading to unnecessary discontinuation and increased cardiovascular risk. Blinded provocation tests may offer a solution for the differentiation of true drug intolerance from nocebo-driven symptoms. Although this methodology is well-established in experimental studies, it has not been transferred to routine clinical practice so far. We present a 65-year-old female with hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular risk factors who experienced recurrent, dose-dependent left-sided lower abdominal pain with different lipid-lowering drugs. These symptoms prompted repeated and ultimately continuous treatment discontinuations, each followed by resolution of complaints. Despite extensive evaluations, no organic cause was found. To assess the role of nocebo effects, a six-week single-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover provocation test with a commercially available placebo preparation and atorvastatin placed in neutral pill containers was conducted. Upon initiation of the provocation phase, the patient experienced similar intermittent symptoms under both treatments. The pain ratings on a numeric rating scale did not significantly differ during placebo (mean: 2.75) and atorvastatin administration (mean: 3.26), suggesting that these symptoms were not pharmacologically induced. Following information of the patient, atorvastatin therapy could be continued. During continued intake over several weeks, symptoms further diminished, reinforcing the therapeutic value of addressing nocebo effects. This case report provides for the first time the structured and detailed step-by-step description of a pragmatic approach for a prospective blinded, placebo-controlled provocation testing that can directly be implemented in routine clinical practice. This method enables the distinction of true drug intolerance from nocebo effects, thereby enabling necessary therapies and highlighting its diagnostic and therapeutic potential.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1604129/fullnocebointolerancestatinsprovocationcase report
spellingShingle Thomas Büttner
Gunther Hartmann
Martin Coenen
Case Report: Practical approach to unmask unspecific adverse effects under lipid-lowering medication
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
nocebo
intolerance
statins
provocation
case report
title Case Report: Practical approach to unmask unspecific adverse effects under lipid-lowering medication
title_full Case Report: Practical approach to unmask unspecific adverse effects under lipid-lowering medication
title_fullStr Case Report: Practical approach to unmask unspecific adverse effects under lipid-lowering medication
title_full_unstemmed Case Report: Practical approach to unmask unspecific adverse effects under lipid-lowering medication
title_short Case Report: Practical approach to unmask unspecific adverse effects under lipid-lowering medication
title_sort case report practical approach to unmask unspecific adverse effects under lipid lowering medication
topic nocebo
intolerance
statins
provocation
case report
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1604129/full
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasbuttner casereportpracticalapproachtounmaskunspecificadverseeffectsunderlipidloweringmedication
AT guntherhartmann casereportpracticalapproachtounmaskunspecificadverseeffectsunderlipidloweringmedication
AT martincoenen casereportpracticalapproachtounmaskunspecificadverseeffectsunderlipidloweringmedication