Caractéristiques syntaxiques de la parenthèse en latin : linéarisation, délimitation et insertion
The aim of the paper is to analyse the syntactic rules of the incidental clause in Latin: indeed, the incidental – i.e. parenthetical sentence - exhibits the following paradox: although it is independent from a structural viewpoint (it constitutes a main clause), it is inserted in another sentence f...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses universitaires de Caen
2017-10-01
|
| Series: | Discours |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/discours/4573 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832581854552653824 |
|---|---|
| author | Isabelle Charnavel |
| author_facet | Isabelle Charnavel |
| author_sort | Isabelle Charnavel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of the paper is to analyse the syntactic rules of the incidental clause in Latin: indeed, the incidental – i.e. parenthetical sentence - exhibits the following paradox: although it is independent from a structural viewpoint (it constitutes a main clause), it is inserted in another sentence from a syntagmatic viewpoint (it linearly occurs inside another sentence, the host). I propose that despite its syntactic autonomy the incidental obeys precise syntactic contraints of insertion.First of all, I show that the incidental, which is always continuous, is delimited on both boundaries, even if it does not have any specific marker: the clause change marks the beginning of the incidental whereas the host start marks its end, by means of repetitions that may lead to anacoluthons.Furthermore, I argue that the position of the incidental in the host sentence obeys specific rules. First, the insertion spots are constrained: they occur between the functional groups of the host sentence. Moreover, there are distributional contraints to decide which insertion spot to use. I propose that the domain of the incidental consists of the constituent(s) over which the incidental semantically scopes and that it always occurs inside or on the periphery of its domain: the incidental to a root clause occurs at the second position of its domain, whereas the incidental to a phrase is on its right border. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-787804b8b1684c3498ab12b5915f2333 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1963-1723 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017-10-01 |
| publisher | Presses universitaires de Caen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Discours |
| spelling | doaj-art-787804b8b1684c3498ab12b5915f23332025-01-30T09:52:54ZengPresses universitaires de CaenDiscours1963-17232017-10-01310.4000/discours.4573Caractéristiques syntaxiques de la parenthèse en latin : linéarisation, délimitation et insertionIsabelle CharnavelThe aim of the paper is to analyse the syntactic rules of the incidental clause in Latin: indeed, the incidental – i.e. parenthetical sentence - exhibits the following paradox: although it is independent from a structural viewpoint (it constitutes a main clause), it is inserted in another sentence from a syntagmatic viewpoint (it linearly occurs inside another sentence, the host). I propose that despite its syntactic autonomy the incidental obeys precise syntactic contraints of insertion.First of all, I show that the incidental, which is always continuous, is delimited on both boundaries, even if it does not have any specific marker: the clause change marks the beginning of the incidental whereas the host start marks its end, by means of repetitions that may lead to anacoluthons.Furthermore, I argue that the position of the incidental in the host sentence obeys specific rules. First, the insertion spots are constrained: they occur between the functional groups of the host sentence. Moreover, there are distributional contraints to decide which insertion spot to use. I propose that the domain of the incidental consists of the constituent(s) over which the incidental semantically scopes and that it always occurs inside or on the periphery of its domain: the incidental to a root clause occurs at the second position of its domain, whereas the incidental to a phrase is on its right border.https://journals.openedition.org/discours/4573incidentalparenthesislinearizationinsertiondelimitationhost |
| spellingShingle | Isabelle Charnavel Caractéristiques syntaxiques de la parenthèse en latin : linéarisation, délimitation et insertion Discours incidental parenthesis linearization insertion delimitation host |
| title | Caractéristiques syntaxiques de la parenthèse en latin : linéarisation, délimitation et insertion |
| title_full | Caractéristiques syntaxiques de la parenthèse en latin : linéarisation, délimitation et insertion |
| title_fullStr | Caractéristiques syntaxiques de la parenthèse en latin : linéarisation, délimitation et insertion |
| title_full_unstemmed | Caractéristiques syntaxiques de la parenthèse en latin : linéarisation, délimitation et insertion |
| title_short | Caractéristiques syntaxiques de la parenthèse en latin : linéarisation, délimitation et insertion |
| title_sort | caracteristiques syntaxiques de la parenthese en latin linearisation delimitation et insertion |
| topic | incidental parenthesis linearization insertion delimitation host |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/discours/4573 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT isabellecharnavel caracteristiquessyntaxiquesdelaparentheseenlatinlinearisationdelimitationetinsertion |