Cancer Detection Rates of Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies after Biparametric MRI

Objective. To compare prostate cancer detection rates (CDRs) and pathology results with targeted prostate biopsy (TB) and systematic prostate biopsy (SB) in biopsy-naive men. Methods. An in-patient control study of 82 men undergoing SB and subsequent TB in case of positive prostate MRI between 2015...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maudy C. W. Gayet, Anouk A. M. A. van der Aa, Harrie P. Beerlage, Bart Ph Schrier, Maaike Gielens, Roel Heesakkers, Gerrit J. Jager, Peter F. A. Mulders, Hessel Wijkstra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Prostate Cancer
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4626781
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566486804201472
author Maudy C. W. Gayet
Anouk A. M. A. van der Aa
Harrie P. Beerlage
Bart Ph Schrier
Maaike Gielens
Roel Heesakkers
Gerrit J. Jager
Peter F. A. Mulders
Hessel Wijkstra
author_facet Maudy C. W. Gayet
Anouk A. M. A. van der Aa
Harrie P. Beerlage
Bart Ph Schrier
Maaike Gielens
Roel Heesakkers
Gerrit J. Jager
Peter F. A. Mulders
Hessel Wijkstra
author_sort Maudy C. W. Gayet
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To compare prostate cancer detection rates (CDRs) and pathology results with targeted prostate biopsy (TB) and systematic prostate biopsy (SB) in biopsy-naive men. Methods. An in-patient control study of 82 men undergoing SB and subsequent TB in case of positive prostate MRI between 2015 and 2017 in the Jeroen Bosch Hospital, the Netherlands. Results. Prostate cancer (PCa) was detected in 54.9% with 70.7% agreement between TB and SB. Significant PCa (Gleason score ≥7) was detected in 24.4%. The CDR with TB and SB was 35.4% and 48.8%, respectively (p=0.052). The CDR of significant prostate cancer with TB and SB was both 20.7%. Clinically significant pathology upgrading occurred in 7.3% by adding TB to SB and 22.0% by adding SB to TB. Conclusions. There is no statistically significant difference between CDRs of SB and TB. Both SB and TB miss significant PCas. Moreover, pathology upgrading occurred more often by adding SB to TB than vice versa. This indicates that the omission of SB in this study population might not be justified.
format Article
id doaj-art-78284e166bc54b9da16d3cc24506bfff
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-3111
2090-312X
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Prostate Cancer
spelling doaj-art-78284e166bc54b9da16d3cc24506bfff2025-02-03T01:04:05ZengWileyProstate Cancer2090-31112090-312X2020-01-01202010.1155/2020/46267814626781Cancer Detection Rates of Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies after Biparametric MRIMaudy C. W. Gayet0Anouk A. M. A. van der Aa1Harrie P. Beerlage2Bart Ph Schrier3Maaike Gielens4Roel Heesakkers5Gerrit J. Jager6Peter F. A. Mulders7Hessel Wijkstra8Department of Urology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 5223 GZ, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, NetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 5223 GZ, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, NetherlandsDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP, Eindhoven, NetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 5223 GZ, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 5223 GZ, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 5223 GZ, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 5223 GZ, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, NetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Radboudumc University Hospital, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, NetherlandsDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP, Eindhoven, NetherlandsObjective. To compare prostate cancer detection rates (CDRs) and pathology results with targeted prostate biopsy (TB) and systematic prostate biopsy (SB) in biopsy-naive men. Methods. An in-patient control study of 82 men undergoing SB and subsequent TB in case of positive prostate MRI between 2015 and 2017 in the Jeroen Bosch Hospital, the Netherlands. Results. Prostate cancer (PCa) was detected in 54.9% with 70.7% agreement between TB and SB. Significant PCa (Gleason score ≥7) was detected in 24.4%. The CDR with TB and SB was 35.4% and 48.8%, respectively (p=0.052). The CDR of significant prostate cancer with TB and SB was both 20.7%. Clinically significant pathology upgrading occurred in 7.3% by adding TB to SB and 22.0% by adding SB to TB. Conclusions. There is no statistically significant difference between CDRs of SB and TB. Both SB and TB miss significant PCas. Moreover, pathology upgrading occurred more often by adding SB to TB than vice versa. This indicates that the omission of SB in this study population might not be justified.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4626781
spellingShingle Maudy C. W. Gayet
Anouk A. M. A. van der Aa
Harrie P. Beerlage
Bart Ph Schrier
Maaike Gielens
Roel Heesakkers
Gerrit J. Jager
Peter F. A. Mulders
Hessel Wijkstra
Cancer Detection Rates of Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies after Biparametric MRI
Prostate Cancer
title Cancer Detection Rates of Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies after Biparametric MRI
title_full Cancer Detection Rates of Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies after Biparametric MRI
title_fullStr Cancer Detection Rates of Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies after Biparametric MRI
title_full_unstemmed Cancer Detection Rates of Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies after Biparametric MRI
title_short Cancer Detection Rates of Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies after Biparametric MRI
title_sort cancer detection rates of systematic and targeted prostate biopsies after biparametric mri
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4626781
work_keys_str_mv AT maudycwgayet cancerdetectionratesofsystematicandtargetedprostatebiopsiesafterbiparametricmri
AT anoukamavanderaa cancerdetectionratesofsystematicandtargetedprostatebiopsiesafterbiparametricmri
AT harriepbeerlage cancerdetectionratesofsystematicandtargetedprostatebiopsiesafterbiparametricmri
AT bartphschrier cancerdetectionratesofsystematicandtargetedprostatebiopsiesafterbiparametricmri
AT maaikegielens cancerdetectionratesofsystematicandtargetedprostatebiopsiesafterbiparametricmri
AT roelheesakkers cancerdetectionratesofsystematicandtargetedprostatebiopsiesafterbiparametricmri
AT gerritjjager cancerdetectionratesofsystematicandtargetedprostatebiopsiesafterbiparametricmri
AT peterfamulders cancerdetectionratesofsystematicandtargetedprostatebiopsiesafterbiparametricmri
AT hesselwijkstra cancerdetectionratesofsystematicandtargetedprostatebiopsiesafterbiparametricmri