Fetomaternal Outcome in Severe Preeclamptic Women Undergoing Emergency Cesarean Section under Either General Or Spinal Anesthesia
This prospective observational study compared the effects of general and spinal anesthesia in 173 severe preeclamptic women undergoing emergency cesarean section. 146 (84.5%) patients underwent spinal anesthesia (SA) and 27 (15.5%) patients had general anesthesia (GA). Most of the patients were pri...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Suman Chattopadhyay, Ashok Das, Subrata Pahari |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Pregnancy |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/325098 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comparing General versus Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section in a Severely Pre-eclamptic Parturients
by: Omer Abdalbagi Mohamed Elawad, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Influence of Positioning on Plain Levobupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section
by: Fabio Gori, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01) -
Nonsurgical Intervention in a Preeclamptic Patient with Spontaneous Spinal Epidural Hematoma
by: Michelle Nguyen, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Relationship between Abdominal Circumference and Incidence of Hypotension during Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia
by: Pattaraleeya Thomard, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Epidural anesthesia in repeated cesarean section.
by: Rolando T. Espín González, et al.
Published: (2003-04-01)