Measurements of Pupillary Diameter and Wavefront Aberrations in Pregnant Women

Purpose. To show whether pregnancy affects the measurements of pupillary diameter and wavefront (WF) aberrations. Methods. This was a case-control study including 34 healthy pregnant women in the third trimester and age-matched 34 nonpregnant women. Only women who had no ocular abnormalities and no...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yesim Altay, Mehmet Metin Altay, Gulizar Demirok, Ozgur Balta, Hulya Bolu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Scientifica
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4129524
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832545717762129920
author Yesim Altay
Mehmet Metin Altay
Gulizar Demirok
Ozgur Balta
Hulya Bolu
author_facet Yesim Altay
Mehmet Metin Altay
Gulizar Demirok
Ozgur Balta
Hulya Bolu
author_sort Yesim Altay
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To show whether pregnancy affects the measurements of pupillary diameter and wavefront (WF) aberrations. Methods. This was a case-control study including 34 healthy pregnant women in the third trimester and age-matched 34 nonpregnant women. Only women who had no ocular abnormalities and no refractive error were included. We measured photopic and mesopic pupil diameter and WF aberrations at the third trimester and at the second postpartum month. Measurements of the right eyes were used in this study. The differences between groups were analysed by paired t-test and t-test. Results. Pregnant women’s mean photopic pupil size in the third trimester was significantly higher than in postpartum period and in control group (3.74 ± 0.77, 3.45 ± 0.53, and 3.49 ± 0.15 mm, p<0.05, resp.). Mesopic pupil size in the third trimester was also higher than in postpartum period and in control group (6.77 ± 0.52, 6.42 ± 0.55, and 6.38 ± 0.21 mm, p<0.05, resp.). RMS-3 and RMS-5 values were higher in pregnancy but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion. Pregnancy increased photopic and mesopic pupil size significantly but did not increase wavefront aberrations notably. Increased pupil size may be due to increased sympathetic activity during pregnancy. And this activity can be noninvasively determined by measuring pupil size.
format Article
id doaj-art-77969c0e19b940b59b80608eb9371f30
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-908X
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Scientifica
spelling doaj-art-77969c0e19b940b59b80608eb9371f302025-02-03T07:25:00ZengWileyScientifica2090-908X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/41295244129524Measurements of Pupillary Diameter and Wavefront Aberrations in Pregnant WomenYesim Altay0Mehmet Metin Altay1Gulizar Demirok2Ozgur Balta3Hulya Bolu4Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, 06340 Ankara, TurkeyEtlik Zubeyde Hanim Women’s Health Training and Research Hospital, 06010 Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, 06520 Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, 06340 Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Batıgoz Eye Hospital, Izmir, TurkeyPurpose. To show whether pregnancy affects the measurements of pupillary diameter and wavefront (WF) aberrations. Methods. This was a case-control study including 34 healthy pregnant women in the third trimester and age-matched 34 nonpregnant women. Only women who had no ocular abnormalities and no refractive error were included. We measured photopic and mesopic pupil diameter and WF aberrations at the third trimester and at the second postpartum month. Measurements of the right eyes were used in this study. The differences between groups were analysed by paired t-test and t-test. Results. Pregnant women’s mean photopic pupil size in the third trimester was significantly higher than in postpartum period and in control group (3.74 ± 0.77, 3.45 ± 0.53, and 3.49 ± 0.15 mm, p<0.05, resp.). Mesopic pupil size in the third trimester was also higher than in postpartum period and in control group (6.77 ± 0.52, 6.42 ± 0.55, and 6.38 ± 0.21 mm, p<0.05, resp.). RMS-3 and RMS-5 values were higher in pregnancy but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion. Pregnancy increased photopic and mesopic pupil size significantly but did not increase wavefront aberrations notably. Increased pupil size may be due to increased sympathetic activity during pregnancy. And this activity can be noninvasively determined by measuring pupil size.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4129524
spellingShingle Yesim Altay
Mehmet Metin Altay
Gulizar Demirok
Ozgur Balta
Hulya Bolu
Measurements of Pupillary Diameter and Wavefront Aberrations in Pregnant Women
Scientifica
title Measurements of Pupillary Diameter and Wavefront Aberrations in Pregnant Women
title_full Measurements of Pupillary Diameter and Wavefront Aberrations in Pregnant Women
title_fullStr Measurements of Pupillary Diameter and Wavefront Aberrations in Pregnant Women
title_full_unstemmed Measurements of Pupillary Diameter and Wavefront Aberrations in Pregnant Women
title_short Measurements of Pupillary Diameter and Wavefront Aberrations in Pregnant Women
title_sort measurements of pupillary diameter and wavefront aberrations in pregnant women
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4129524
work_keys_str_mv AT yesimaltay measurementsofpupillarydiameterandwavefrontaberrationsinpregnantwomen
AT mehmetmetinaltay measurementsofpupillarydiameterandwavefrontaberrationsinpregnantwomen
AT gulizardemirok measurementsofpupillarydiameterandwavefrontaberrationsinpregnantwomen
AT ozgurbalta measurementsofpupillarydiameterandwavefrontaberrationsinpregnantwomen
AT hulyabolu measurementsofpupillarydiameterandwavefrontaberrationsinpregnantwomen