Validation of Friction Model Parameters Identified Using the IHB Method Using Finite Element Method

A hybrid friction model was recently developed by Azizian and Mureithi (2013) to simulate the friction behavior of tube-support interaction. However, identification and validation of the model parameters remains unresolved. In previous work, the friction model parameters were identified using the re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdallah Hadji, Njuki Mureithi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Shock and Vibration
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3493052
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832545446014222336
author Abdallah Hadji
Njuki Mureithi
author_facet Abdallah Hadji
Njuki Mureithi
author_sort Abdallah Hadji
collection DOAJ
description A hybrid friction model was recently developed by Azizian and Mureithi (2013) to simulate the friction behavior of tube-support interaction. However, identification and validation of the model parameters remains unresolved. In previous work, the friction model parameters were identified using the reverse harmonic method, where the following quantities were indirectly obtained by measuring the vibration response of a beam: friction force, sliding speed of the force of impact, and local displacement at the contact point. In the present work, the numerical simulation by the finite element method (FEM) of a beam clamped at one end and simply supported with the consideration of friction effect at the other is conducted. This beam is used to validate the inverse harmonic balance method and the parameters of the friction models identified previously. Two static friction models (the Coulomb model and Stribeck model) are tested. The two models produce friction forces of the correct order of magnitude compared to the friction force calculated using the inverse harmonic balance method. However, the models cannot accurately reproduce the beam response; the Stribeck friction model is shown to give the response closest to experiments. The results demonstrate some of the challenges associated with accurate friction model parameter identification using the inverse harmonic balance method. The present work is an intermediate step toward identification of the hybrid friction model parameters and, longer-term, improved analysis of tube-support dynamic behavior under the influence of friction.
format Article
id doaj-art-777e2a45eb2543d9ad644fb3639d06dc
institution Kabale University
issn 1070-9622
1875-9203
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Shock and Vibration
spelling doaj-art-777e2a45eb2543d9ad644fb3639d06dc2025-02-03T07:25:53ZengWileyShock and Vibration1070-96221875-92032019-01-01201910.1155/2019/34930523493052Validation of Friction Model Parameters Identified Using the IHB Method Using Finite Element MethodAbdallah Hadji0Njuki Mureithi1Department of Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, H3T 1J4 Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, H3T 1J4 Montreal, Quebec, CanadaA hybrid friction model was recently developed by Azizian and Mureithi (2013) to simulate the friction behavior of tube-support interaction. However, identification and validation of the model parameters remains unresolved. In previous work, the friction model parameters were identified using the reverse harmonic method, where the following quantities were indirectly obtained by measuring the vibration response of a beam: friction force, sliding speed of the force of impact, and local displacement at the contact point. In the present work, the numerical simulation by the finite element method (FEM) of a beam clamped at one end and simply supported with the consideration of friction effect at the other is conducted. This beam is used to validate the inverse harmonic balance method and the parameters of the friction models identified previously. Two static friction models (the Coulomb model and Stribeck model) are tested. The two models produce friction forces of the correct order of magnitude compared to the friction force calculated using the inverse harmonic balance method. However, the models cannot accurately reproduce the beam response; the Stribeck friction model is shown to give the response closest to experiments. The results demonstrate some of the challenges associated with accurate friction model parameter identification using the inverse harmonic balance method. The present work is an intermediate step toward identification of the hybrid friction model parameters and, longer-term, improved analysis of tube-support dynamic behavior under the influence of friction.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3493052
spellingShingle Abdallah Hadji
Njuki Mureithi
Validation of Friction Model Parameters Identified Using the IHB Method Using Finite Element Method
Shock and Vibration
title Validation of Friction Model Parameters Identified Using the IHB Method Using Finite Element Method
title_full Validation of Friction Model Parameters Identified Using the IHB Method Using Finite Element Method
title_fullStr Validation of Friction Model Parameters Identified Using the IHB Method Using Finite Element Method
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Friction Model Parameters Identified Using the IHB Method Using Finite Element Method
title_short Validation of Friction Model Parameters Identified Using the IHB Method Using Finite Element Method
title_sort validation of friction model parameters identified using the ihb method using finite element method
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3493052
work_keys_str_mv AT abdallahhadji validationoffrictionmodelparametersidentifiedusingtheihbmethodusingfiniteelementmethod
AT njukimureithi validationoffrictionmodelparametersidentifiedusingtheihbmethodusingfiniteelementmethod