Laïcité et faits religieux : conduire des débats avec les élèves, quels dispositifs ?

The reactivation of the “religious fact” questions the teachers on their professional posture.: The analyses developed here correspond to questionings of trainers of teachers in charge of these questions. Situations of ordinary class with conferences and debates, discussed during the time on the bir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathalie Panissal, Hubert Strouk
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée 2017-12-01
Series:Éducation et Socialisation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/edso/2711
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832578688024051712
author Nathalie Panissal
Hubert Strouk
author_facet Nathalie Panissal
Hubert Strouk
author_sort Nathalie Panissal
collection DOAJ
description The reactivation of the “religious fact” questions the teachers on their professional posture.: The analyses developed here correspond to questionings of trainers of teachers in charge of these questions. Situations of ordinary class with conferences and debates, discussed during the time on the birthday of the law of 1905 that has separated Churches from the State, are analyzed in order to be used as track with the initial training of the teachers. After having presented the scenarios of teaching and debates, we have studied the recorded corpora. The analyses led in terms of knowledge construction show that the reasons to be knowledge miss. The place reserved for the debate is thus extremely reduced. We discuss the interest of the preparatory phase to the debate and propose didactic tracks taking support on the inquiry approach.
format Article
id doaj-art-771b8b80814c4dd790bffa8377563c3d
institution Kabale University
issn 2271-6092
language fra
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée
record_format Article
series Éducation et Socialisation
spelling doaj-art-771b8b80814c4dd790bffa8377563c3d2025-01-30T13:39:40ZfraPresses universitaires de la MéditerranéeÉducation et Socialisation2271-60922017-12-014610.4000/edso.2711Laïcité et faits religieux : conduire des débats avec les élèves, quels dispositifs ?Nathalie PanissalHubert StroukThe reactivation of the “religious fact” questions the teachers on their professional posture.: The analyses developed here correspond to questionings of trainers of teachers in charge of these questions. Situations of ordinary class with conferences and debates, discussed during the time on the birthday of the law of 1905 that has separated Churches from the State, are analyzed in order to be used as track with the initial training of the teachers. After having presented the scenarios of teaching and debates, we have studied the recorded corpora. The analyses led in terms of knowledge construction show that the reasons to be knowledge miss. The place reserved for the debate is thus extremely reduced. We discuss the interest of the preparatory phase to the debate and propose didactic tracks taking support on the inquiry approach.https://journals.openedition.org/edso/2711debateSecularityteaching of the religious factsSAQinquiry.
spellingShingle Nathalie Panissal
Hubert Strouk
Laïcité et faits religieux : conduire des débats avec les élèves, quels dispositifs ?
Éducation et Socialisation
debate
Secularity
teaching of the religious facts
SAQ
inquiry.
title Laïcité et faits religieux : conduire des débats avec les élèves, quels dispositifs ?
title_full Laïcité et faits religieux : conduire des débats avec les élèves, quels dispositifs ?
title_fullStr Laïcité et faits religieux : conduire des débats avec les élèves, quels dispositifs ?
title_full_unstemmed Laïcité et faits religieux : conduire des débats avec les élèves, quels dispositifs ?
title_short Laïcité et faits religieux : conduire des débats avec les élèves, quels dispositifs ?
title_sort laicite et faits religieux conduire des debats avec les eleves quels dispositifs
topic debate
Secularity
teaching of the religious facts
SAQ
inquiry.
url https://journals.openedition.org/edso/2711
work_keys_str_mv AT nathaliepanissal laiciteetfaitsreligieuxconduiredesdebatsavecleselevesquelsdispositifs
AT hubertstrouk laiciteetfaitsreligieuxconduiredesdebatsavecleselevesquelsdispositifs