A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device

Background. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used over decades for pain management, but migration of percutaneous leads has been the most common complication. Better surgical techniques and newer SCS technologies likely reduced the incidence of lead migration requiring surgical revision, altho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mayank Gupta, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Meghan Hughes, Anand Rotte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6639801
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832555001818382336
author Mayank Gupta
Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Meghan Hughes
Anand Rotte
author_facet Mayank Gupta
Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Meghan Hughes
Anand Rotte
author_sort Mayank Gupta
collection DOAJ
description Background. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used over decades for pain management, but migration of percutaneous leads has been the most common complication. Better surgical techniques and newer SCS technologies likely reduced the incidence of lead migration requiring surgical revision, although data are sparse. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the incidence of clinically significant percutaneous lead migration in patients permanently implanted with a 10 kHz SCS system. Methods. Consecutive patients with chronic trunk and/or limb pain, permanently implanted between January 2016 and June 2019, were included in the analysis. Data were collected from the hospital’s electronic medical records and the manufacturer’s database. Clinically significant lead migration, defined as diminished pain relief followed by surgery to correct lead location, was assessed at the 6-month follow-up. Results. At the 6-month follow-up, there were no cases of clinically significant lead migration, average pain relief was 65.2%, 82% of patients had response (≥50% pain relief), improvement of function was noted in 72% of patients, and decrease of medication was observed in 42% of patients. Therapy efficacy was sustained in patients with >12 months follow-up; the average pain relief was 58.5%, and the response rate was 82%. Conclusions. The surgical techniques in use today are designed to minimise the risk of percutaneous lead migration and may have reduced its incidence. In addition, new SCS systems may give greater opportunity to mitigate cases of minor lead movement using alternative stimulation programs.
format Article
id doaj-art-76da0c4991d443e384bf215ff6253a90
institution Kabale University
issn 1203-6765
1918-1523
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pain Research and Management
spelling doaj-art-76da0c4991d443e384bf215ff6253a902025-02-03T05:49:51ZengWileyPain Research and Management1203-67651918-15232021-01-01202110.1155/2021/66398016639801A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS DeviceMayank Gupta0Alaa Abd-Elsayed1Meghan Hughes2Anand Rotte3Kansas Pain Management and Neuroscience Research Center, Overland Park, KS, USAUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madisson, WI, USAUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madisson, WI, USAClinical and Regulatory Affairs, Nevro Corp., Redwood City, CA, USABackground. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used over decades for pain management, but migration of percutaneous leads has been the most common complication. Better surgical techniques and newer SCS technologies likely reduced the incidence of lead migration requiring surgical revision, although data are sparse. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the incidence of clinically significant percutaneous lead migration in patients permanently implanted with a 10 kHz SCS system. Methods. Consecutive patients with chronic trunk and/or limb pain, permanently implanted between January 2016 and June 2019, were included in the analysis. Data were collected from the hospital’s electronic medical records and the manufacturer’s database. Clinically significant lead migration, defined as diminished pain relief followed by surgery to correct lead location, was assessed at the 6-month follow-up. Results. At the 6-month follow-up, there were no cases of clinically significant lead migration, average pain relief was 65.2%, 82% of patients had response (≥50% pain relief), improvement of function was noted in 72% of patients, and decrease of medication was observed in 42% of patients. Therapy efficacy was sustained in patients with >12 months follow-up; the average pain relief was 58.5%, and the response rate was 82%. Conclusions. The surgical techniques in use today are designed to minimise the risk of percutaneous lead migration and may have reduced its incidence. In addition, new SCS systems may give greater opportunity to mitigate cases of minor lead movement using alternative stimulation programs.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6639801
spellingShingle Mayank Gupta
Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Meghan Hughes
Anand Rotte
A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device
Pain Research and Management
title A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device
title_full A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device
title_fullStr A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device
title_short A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device
title_sort retrospective review of lead migration rate in patients permanently implanted with percutaneous leads and a 10 khz scs device
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6639801
work_keys_str_mv AT mayankgupta aretrospectivereviewofleadmigrationrateinpatientspermanentlyimplantedwithpercutaneousleadsanda10khzscsdevice
AT alaaabdelsayed aretrospectivereviewofleadmigrationrateinpatientspermanentlyimplantedwithpercutaneousleadsanda10khzscsdevice
AT meghanhughes aretrospectivereviewofleadmigrationrateinpatientspermanentlyimplantedwithpercutaneousleadsanda10khzscsdevice
AT anandrotte aretrospectivereviewofleadmigrationrateinpatientspermanentlyimplantedwithpercutaneousleadsanda10khzscsdevice
AT mayankgupta retrospectivereviewofleadmigrationrateinpatientspermanentlyimplantedwithpercutaneousleadsanda10khzscsdevice
AT alaaabdelsayed retrospectivereviewofleadmigrationrateinpatientspermanentlyimplantedwithpercutaneousleadsanda10khzscsdevice
AT meghanhughes retrospectivereviewofleadmigrationrateinpatientspermanentlyimplantedwithpercutaneousleadsanda10khzscsdevice
AT anandrotte retrospectivereviewofleadmigrationrateinpatientspermanentlyimplantedwithpercutaneousleadsanda10khzscsdevice