Oncologic Impact of Conservative Treatment Compared with Surgical Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Objectives: Differences in oncological outcomes between conservative and surgical treatments for anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery remain unclear. Methods: From July 2011 to June 2020, 385 patients underwent curative resection with double-stapling anastomosis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junichi Sakamoto, Atsuko Tsutsui, Chie Hagiwara, Go Wakabayashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Japan Society of Coloproctology 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jarc/9/1/9_2024-005/_pdf/-char/en
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584933701320704
author Junichi Sakamoto
Atsuko Tsutsui
Chie Hagiwara
Go Wakabayashi
author_facet Junichi Sakamoto
Atsuko Tsutsui
Chie Hagiwara
Go Wakabayashi
author_sort Junichi Sakamoto
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: Differences in oncological outcomes between conservative and surgical treatments for anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery remain unclear. Methods: From July 2011 to June 2020, 385 patients underwent curative resection with double-stapling anastomosis for left-sided colon and rectal cancers. Among them, 33 patients who experienced AL were retrospectively evaluated and categorized into two groups: conservative (n = 20) and surgical (n = 13). In the surgical group, abdominal lavage using a sufficient amount of normal saline was performed during reoperation. The primary endpoint was the 3-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR). Results: Seven (21.2%) patients in the conservative group experienced LR, while none in the surgical group. Survival analysis indicated no differences in overall and recurrent-free survival. However, the 3-year cumulative incidence of LR was significantly lower in the surgical group than in the conservative group (0% versus 31.3%, p=0.045). Conclusions: Differences in AL management were associated with oncological outcomes, specifically a decreased LR. Therefore, surgeons should consider our findings when determining the most appropriate AL treatment to improve oncological outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-76bccb3d20014ad6b3b3ea054a2b325e
institution Kabale University
issn 2432-3853
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher The Japan Society of Coloproctology
record_format Article
series Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon
spelling doaj-art-76bccb3d20014ad6b3b3ea054a2b325e2025-01-27T10:02:40ZengThe Japan Society of ColoproctologyJournal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon2432-38532025-01-0191616810.23922/jarc.2024-0052024-005Oncologic Impact of Conservative Treatment Compared with Surgical Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective StudyJunichi Sakamoto0Atsuko Tsutsui1Chie Hagiwara2Go Wakabayashi3Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Ageo Central General HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Ageo Central General HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Ageo Central General HospitalObjectives: Differences in oncological outcomes between conservative and surgical treatments for anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery remain unclear. Methods: From July 2011 to June 2020, 385 patients underwent curative resection with double-stapling anastomosis for left-sided colon and rectal cancers. Among them, 33 patients who experienced AL were retrospectively evaluated and categorized into two groups: conservative (n = 20) and surgical (n = 13). In the surgical group, abdominal lavage using a sufficient amount of normal saline was performed during reoperation. The primary endpoint was the 3-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR). Results: Seven (21.2%) patients in the conservative group experienced LR, while none in the surgical group. Survival analysis indicated no differences in overall and recurrent-free survival. However, the 3-year cumulative incidence of LR was significantly lower in the surgical group than in the conservative group (0% versus 31.3%, p=0.045). Conclusions: Differences in AL management were associated with oncological outcomes, specifically a decreased LR. Therefore, surgeons should consider our findings when determining the most appropriate AL treatment to improve oncological outcomes.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jarc/9/1/9_2024-005/_pdf/-char/enanastomotic leakagecolorectal cancerlocal recurrenceoncological outcome
spellingShingle Junichi Sakamoto
Atsuko Tsutsui
Chie Hagiwara
Go Wakabayashi
Oncologic Impact of Conservative Treatment Compared with Surgical Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon
anastomotic leakage
colorectal cancer
local recurrence
oncological outcome
title Oncologic Impact of Conservative Treatment Compared with Surgical Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_full Oncologic Impact of Conservative Treatment Compared with Surgical Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Oncologic Impact of Conservative Treatment Compared with Surgical Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Oncologic Impact of Conservative Treatment Compared with Surgical Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_short Oncologic Impact of Conservative Treatment Compared with Surgical Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_sort oncologic impact of conservative treatment compared with surgical treatment of anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer surgery a retrospective study
topic anastomotic leakage
colorectal cancer
local recurrence
oncological outcome
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jarc/9/1/9_2024-005/_pdf/-char/en
work_keys_str_mv AT junichisakamoto oncologicimpactofconservativetreatmentcomparedwithsurgicaltreatmentofanastomoticleakagefollowingcolorectalcancersurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT atsukotsutsui oncologicimpactofconservativetreatmentcomparedwithsurgicaltreatmentofanastomoticleakagefollowingcolorectalcancersurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT chiehagiwara oncologicimpactofconservativetreatmentcomparedwithsurgicaltreatmentofanastomoticleakagefollowingcolorectalcancersurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT gowakabayashi oncologicimpactofconservativetreatmentcomparedwithsurgicaltreatmentofanastomoticleakagefollowingcolorectalcancersurgeryaretrospectivestudy