Whatever Happened to Projective Architecture? Rethinking the Expertise of the Architect

This review article takes the discussion of ‘projective’ architecture as its starting point, and proposes that this recent debate may still be worthwhile to rethink the relationship between practice and theory in architecture. The spirit of ‘projective’ architecture suggests that we rethink how arch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lara Schrijver
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: TU Delft OPEN Publishing 2009-01-01
Series:Footprint
Online Access:https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/704
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550761567879168
author Lara Schrijver
author_facet Lara Schrijver
author_sort Lara Schrijver
collection DOAJ
description This review article takes the discussion of ‘projective’ architecture as its starting point, and proposes that this recent debate may still be worthwhile to rethink the relationship between practice and theory in architecture. The spirit of ‘projective’ architecture suggests that we rethink how architecture ‘works’. This would entail understanding the reconfigured relation between political/societal and aesthetic/cultural engagement. Drawing from the ideas in the American debate on the ‘projective’ and the recent work of Richard Sennett on ‘craft’, this article puts forward the position that the notion of the ‘projective’ can extend the insights of critical theory towards a more fruitful dialogue with the everyday practice of architecture.
format Article
id doaj-art-7641ae28d8bb4abd8f0c45fcfca0d134
institution Kabale University
issn 1875-1504
1875-1490
language English
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher TU Delft OPEN Publishing
record_format Article
series Footprint
spelling doaj-art-7641ae28d8bb4abd8f0c45fcfca0d1342025-02-03T06:05:54ZengTU Delft OPEN PublishingFootprint1875-15041875-14902009-01-013110.7480/footprint.3.1.704730Whatever Happened to Projective Architecture? Rethinking the Expertise of the ArchitectLara SchrijverThis review article takes the discussion of ‘projective’ architecture as its starting point, and proposes that this recent debate may still be worthwhile to rethink the relationship between practice and theory in architecture. The spirit of ‘projective’ architecture suggests that we rethink how architecture ‘works’. This would entail understanding the reconfigured relation between political/societal and aesthetic/cultural engagement. Drawing from the ideas in the American debate on the ‘projective’ and the recent work of Richard Sennett on ‘craft’, this article puts forward the position that the notion of the ‘projective’ can extend the insights of critical theory towards a more fruitful dialogue with the everyday practice of architecture.https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/704
spellingShingle Lara Schrijver
Whatever Happened to Projective Architecture? Rethinking the Expertise of the Architect
Footprint
title Whatever Happened to Projective Architecture? Rethinking the Expertise of the Architect
title_full Whatever Happened to Projective Architecture? Rethinking the Expertise of the Architect
title_fullStr Whatever Happened to Projective Architecture? Rethinking the Expertise of the Architect
title_full_unstemmed Whatever Happened to Projective Architecture? Rethinking the Expertise of the Architect
title_short Whatever Happened to Projective Architecture? Rethinking the Expertise of the Architect
title_sort whatever happened to projective architecture rethinking the expertise of the architect
url https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/704
work_keys_str_mv AT laraschrijver whateverhappenedtoprojectivearchitecturerethinkingtheexpertiseofthearchitect