Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients on Hemodialysis following Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal Coronary Stents

Aim. This study sought to compare short- and long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus bare-metal stents (BMSs) implantation in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis (ESRD-HD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods. Adult patients with ESRD-HD who...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amir F. Mohani, Srikanth Penumetsa, Amin Daoulah, Gregory Giugliano, Amir Lotfi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Cardiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4934982
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554788423729152
author Amir F. Mohani
Srikanth Penumetsa
Amin Daoulah
Gregory Giugliano
Amir Lotfi
author_facet Amir F. Mohani
Srikanth Penumetsa
Amin Daoulah
Gregory Giugliano
Amir Lotfi
author_sort Amir F. Mohani
collection DOAJ
description Aim. This study sought to compare short- and long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus bare-metal stents (BMSs) implantation in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis (ESRD-HD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods. Adult patients with ESRD-HD who underwent PCI at all nonfederal hospitals in Massachusetts between July 1, 2003, and September 30, 2007, were stratified based on the stent type placed at index hospitalization: DES or BMS. The primary outcome compared was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stroke at 30 days and one year. Results. HD patients had a high mortality (31%) and were more likely to receive a DES than a BMS (77% versus 23%). Propensity score analysis of 2 : 1 matched DES (268) versus BMS (134) patients demonstrated the DES group to more likely have proximal LAD disease and a history of prior PCI. Conditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the composite cardiovascular endpoint measured at 30 days (hazard ratio (HR) 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–1.94) and one year (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.68–1.57). Conclusions. There were no significant differences in 30-day or 1-year major cardiovascular outcomes in HD patients undergoing PCI using the DES compared to the BMS in this high-mortality patient cohort.
format Article
id doaj-art-763ec63cabd645a183fdda7e726aff38
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8016
2090-0597
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cardiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-763ec63cabd645a183fdda7e726aff382025-02-03T05:50:35ZengWileyCardiology Research and Practice2090-80162090-05972018-01-01201810.1155/2018/49349824934982Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients on Hemodialysis following Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal Coronary StentsAmir F. Mohani0Srikanth Penumetsa1Amin Daoulah2Gregory Giugliano3Amir Lotfi4Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Springfield, MA 01199, USADeaconess Health System, Evansville, IN 47747, USAKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Jeddah 23736, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Springfield, MA 01199, USADepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Springfield, MA 01199, USAAim. This study sought to compare short- and long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus bare-metal stents (BMSs) implantation in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis (ESRD-HD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods. Adult patients with ESRD-HD who underwent PCI at all nonfederal hospitals in Massachusetts between July 1, 2003, and September 30, 2007, were stratified based on the stent type placed at index hospitalization: DES or BMS. The primary outcome compared was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stroke at 30 days and one year. Results. HD patients had a high mortality (31%) and were more likely to receive a DES than a BMS (77% versus 23%). Propensity score analysis of 2 : 1 matched DES (268) versus BMS (134) patients demonstrated the DES group to more likely have proximal LAD disease and a history of prior PCI. Conditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the composite cardiovascular endpoint measured at 30 days (hazard ratio (HR) 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–1.94) and one year (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.68–1.57). Conclusions. There were no significant differences in 30-day or 1-year major cardiovascular outcomes in HD patients undergoing PCI using the DES compared to the BMS in this high-mortality patient cohort.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4934982
spellingShingle Amir F. Mohani
Srikanth Penumetsa
Amin Daoulah
Gregory Giugliano
Amir Lotfi
Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients on Hemodialysis following Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal Coronary Stents
Cardiology Research and Practice
title Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients on Hemodialysis following Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal Coronary Stents
title_full Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients on Hemodialysis following Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal Coronary Stents
title_fullStr Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients on Hemodialysis following Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal Coronary Stents
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients on Hemodialysis following Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal Coronary Stents
title_short Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients on Hemodialysis following Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal Coronary Stents
title_sort cardiovascular outcomes in patients on hemodialysis following drug eluting versus bare metal coronary stents
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4934982
work_keys_str_mv AT amirfmohani cardiovascularoutcomesinpatientsonhemodialysisfollowingdrugelutingversusbaremetalcoronarystents
AT srikanthpenumetsa cardiovascularoutcomesinpatientsonhemodialysisfollowingdrugelutingversusbaremetalcoronarystents
AT amindaoulah cardiovascularoutcomesinpatientsonhemodialysisfollowingdrugelutingversusbaremetalcoronarystents
AT gregorygiugliano cardiovascularoutcomesinpatientsonhemodialysisfollowingdrugelutingversusbaremetalcoronarystents
AT amirlotfi cardiovascularoutcomesinpatientsonhemodialysisfollowingdrugelutingversusbaremetalcoronarystents