A comparative study of diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System and computed tomography severity score in clinically suspected COVID-19 patients

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and computed tomography (CT) severity score (CT-SS) in patients with clinically suspected coronavirus disease. Methods: A cross-sectional study was done. Patients presenting to th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vikram Kyatham, Yarramsetty Pundari Kashudu, T.R. Nagendra, Rama Rao Piprikar, Rhidaynath A Kogekar, Rahul Bhargava
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-12-01
Series:The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jacp.jacp_14_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832593935203041280
author Vikram Kyatham
Yarramsetty Pundari Kashudu
T.R. Nagendra
Rama Rao Piprikar
Rhidaynath A Kogekar
Rahul Bhargava
author_facet Vikram Kyatham
Yarramsetty Pundari Kashudu
T.R. Nagendra
Rama Rao Piprikar
Rhidaynath A Kogekar
Rahul Bhargava
author_sort Vikram Kyatham
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and computed tomography (CT) severity score (CT-SS) in patients with clinically suspected coronavirus disease. Methods: A cross-sectional study was done. Patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suspicious for COVID-19 were participated. Patients referred with a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) had chest CT evaluation done by CO-RADS and CT-SS, respectively, by an independent investigator. A binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the two scoring systems in diagnosing COVID infection, considering RT-PCR as the reference standard. Results: A total of 400 cases were evaluated. Two hundred sixty-eight patients with a clinical suspicion of COVID-19 had a positive RT-PCR. The mean duration of symptoms was 5.5 ± 3.4 (range, 1–21 days). The mean CO-RADS and CT-SS scores were 3.7 ± 1.4 (range, 1–5) and 9.1 ± 7.5 (range, 0–28), respectively. Air leaks, including pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and surgical emphysema, were observed in six cases. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of CO-RADS was 93.8, 80, 90.7, 92.1, and 90%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of CT-SS were 95, 76, 86, 89, and 85%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for CO-RADS was 0.943 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.909–0.976, P < 0.001] and AUC for CT-SS was 0.877 (95% CI, 0.821–0.933, P < 0.001), respectively. The cut-off values of CT-SS and CO-RADS were 7.1 and 4.2, respectively. Conclusion: Both scoring systems had good sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy in comparison to RT-PCR test to diagnose COVID-19 infection.
format Article
id doaj-art-75cc2883f96e4d1eaf66d2f57c195bb2
institution Kabale University
issn 2320-8775
language English
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians
spelling doaj-art-75cc2883f96e4d1eaf66d2f57c195bb22025-01-20T07:27:01ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsThe Journal of Association of Chest Physicians2320-87752023-12-0111421722210.4103/jacp.jacp_14_23A comparative study of diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System and computed tomography severity score in clinically suspected COVID-19 patientsVikram KyathamYarramsetty Pundari KashuduT.R. NagendraRama Rao PiprikarRhidaynath A KogekarRahul BhargavaPurpose: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and computed tomography (CT) severity score (CT-SS) in patients with clinically suspected coronavirus disease. Methods: A cross-sectional study was done. Patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suspicious for COVID-19 were participated. Patients referred with a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) had chest CT evaluation done by CO-RADS and CT-SS, respectively, by an independent investigator. A binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the two scoring systems in diagnosing COVID infection, considering RT-PCR as the reference standard. Results: A total of 400 cases were evaluated. Two hundred sixty-eight patients with a clinical suspicion of COVID-19 had a positive RT-PCR. The mean duration of symptoms was 5.5 ± 3.4 (range, 1–21 days). The mean CO-RADS and CT-SS scores were 3.7 ± 1.4 (range, 1–5) and 9.1 ± 7.5 (range, 0–28), respectively. Air leaks, including pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and surgical emphysema, were observed in six cases. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of CO-RADS was 93.8, 80, 90.7, 92.1, and 90%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of CT-SS were 95, 76, 86, 89, and 85%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for CO-RADS was 0.943 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.909–0.976, P < 0.001] and AUC for CT-SS was 0.877 (95% CI, 0.821–0.933, P < 0.001), respectively. The cut-off values of CT-SS and CO-RADS were 7.1 and 4.2, respectively. Conclusion: Both scoring systems had good sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy in comparison to RT-PCR test to diagnose COVID-19 infection.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jacp.jacp_14_23covid-19 reporting and data systemcomputed tomography severity scorereverse transcription polymerase chain reactionsensitivityspecificity
spellingShingle Vikram Kyatham
Yarramsetty Pundari Kashudu
T.R. Nagendra
Rama Rao Piprikar
Rhidaynath A Kogekar
Rahul Bhargava
A comparative study of diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System and computed tomography severity score in clinically suspected COVID-19 patients
The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians
covid-19 reporting and data system
computed tomography severity score
reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
sensitivity
specificity
title A comparative study of diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System and computed tomography severity score in clinically suspected COVID-19 patients
title_full A comparative study of diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System and computed tomography severity score in clinically suspected COVID-19 patients
title_fullStr A comparative study of diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System and computed tomography severity score in clinically suspected COVID-19 patients
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System and computed tomography severity score in clinically suspected COVID-19 patients
title_short A comparative study of diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System and computed tomography severity score in clinically suspected COVID-19 patients
title_sort comparative study of diagnostic performance of covid 19 reporting and data system and computed tomography severity score in clinically suspected covid 19 patients
topic covid-19 reporting and data system
computed tomography severity score
reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
sensitivity
specificity
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jacp.jacp_14_23
work_keys_str_mv AT vikramkyatham acomparativestudyofdiagnosticperformanceofcovid19reportinganddatasystemandcomputedtomographyseverityscoreinclinicallysuspectedcovid19patients
AT yarramsettypundarikashudu acomparativestudyofdiagnosticperformanceofcovid19reportinganddatasystemandcomputedtomographyseverityscoreinclinicallysuspectedcovid19patients
AT trnagendra acomparativestudyofdiagnosticperformanceofcovid19reportinganddatasystemandcomputedtomographyseverityscoreinclinicallysuspectedcovid19patients
AT ramaraopiprikar acomparativestudyofdiagnosticperformanceofcovid19reportinganddatasystemandcomputedtomographyseverityscoreinclinicallysuspectedcovid19patients
AT rhidaynathakogekar acomparativestudyofdiagnosticperformanceofcovid19reportinganddatasystemandcomputedtomographyseverityscoreinclinicallysuspectedcovid19patients
AT rahulbhargava acomparativestudyofdiagnosticperformanceofcovid19reportinganddatasystemandcomputedtomographyseverityscoreinclinicallysuspectedcovid19patients
AT vikramkyatham comparativestudyofdiagnosticperformanceofcovid19reportinganddatasystemandcomputedtomographyseverityscoreinclinicallysuspectedcovid19patients
AT yarramsettypundarikashudu comparativestudyofdiagnosticperformanceofcovid19reportinganddatasystemandcomputedtomographyseverityscoreinclinicallysuspectedcovid19patients
AT trnagendra comparativestudyofdiagnosticperformanceofcovid19reportinganddatasystemandcomputedtomographyseverityscoreinclinicallysuspectedcovid19patients
AT ramaraopiprikar comparativestudyofdiagnosticperformanceofcovid19reportinganddatasystemandcomputedtomographyseverityscoreinclinicallysuspectedcovid19patients
AT rhidaynathakogekar comparativestudyofdiagnosticperformanceofcovid19reportinganddatasystemandcomputedtomographyseverityscoreinclinicallysuspectedcovid19patients
AT rahulbhargava comparativestudyofdiagnosticperformanceofcovid19reportinganddatasystemandcomputedtomographyseverityscoreinclinicallysuspectedcovid19patients