Thomas Reid, the Internalist
Philosophical orthodoxy holds that Thomas Reid is an externalist concerning epistemic justification, characterizing Reid as holding the key to an externalist response to internalism. These externalist accounts of Reid, however, have neglected his work on prejudice, a heretofore unexamined aspect of...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Aperio
2022-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Modern Philosophy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jmphil.org/article/id/2008/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832575959944921088 |
---|---|
author | Robert Weston Siscoe |
author_facet | Robert Weston Siscoe |
author_sort | Robert Weston Siscoe |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Philosophical orthodoxy holds that Thomas Reid is an externalist concerning epistemic justification, characterizing Reid as holding the key to an externalist response to internalism. These externalist accounts of Reid, however, have neglected his work on prejudice, a heretofore unexamined aspect of his epistemology. Reid’s work on prejudice reveals that he is far from an externalist. Despite the views Reid may have inspired, he exemplifies internalism in opting for an accessibility account of justification. For Reid, there are two normative statuses that a belief might satisfy, being blameless and having a just ground. Through reflection, a rational agent is capable of satisfying both of these statuses, making Reid an accessibility internalist about epistemic justification. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-75c459c838d34b94acce6f7cdae48d2a |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2644-0652 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022-04-01 |
publisher | Aperio |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Modern Philosophy |
spelling | doaj-art-75c459c838d34b94acce6f7cdae48d2a2025-01-31T16:08:26ZengAperioJournal of Modern Philosophy2644-06522022-04-014010.25894/jmp.2008Thomas Reid, the InternalistRobert Weston Siscoe0 Philosophical orthodoxy holds that Thomas Reid is an externalist concerning epistemic justification, characterizing Reid as holding the key to an externalist response to internalism. These externalist accounts of Reid, however, have neglected his work on prejudice, a heretofore unexamined aspect of his epistemology. Reid’s work on prejudice reveals that he is far from an externalist. Despite the views Reid may have inspired, he exemplifies internalism in opting for an accessibility account of justification. For Reid, there are two normative statuses that a belief might satisfy, being blameless and having a just ground. Through reflection, a rational agent is capable of satisfying both of these statuses, making Reid an accessibility internalist about epistemic justification.https://jmphil.org/article/id/2008/Thomas ReidPrejudiceEpistemic JustificationInternalism vs. Externalism |
spellingShingle | Robert Weston Siscoe Thomas Reid, the Internalist Journal of Modern Philosophy Thomas Reid Prejudice Epistemic Justification Internalism vs. Externalism |
title | Thomas Reid, the Internalist |
title_full | Thomas Reid, the Internalist |
title_fullStr | Thomas Reid, the Internalist |
title_full_unstemmed | Thomas Reid, the Internalist |
title_short | Thomas Reid, the Internalist |
title_sort | thomas reid the internalist |
topic | Thomas Reid Prejudice Epistemic Justification Internalism vs. Externalism |
url | https://jmphil.org/article/id/2008/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertwestonsiscoe thomasreidtheinternalist |