Thomas Reid, the Internalist

Philosophical orthodoxy holds that Thomas Reid is an externalist concerning epistemic justification, characterizing Reid as holding the key to an externalist response to internalism. These externalist accounts of Reid, however, have neglected his work on prejudice, a heretofore unexamined aspect of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robert Weston Siscoe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aperio 2022-04-01
Series:Journal of Modern Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jmphil.org/article/id/2008/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575959944921088
author Robert Weston Siscoe
author_facet Robert Weston Siscoe
author_sort Robert Weston Siscoe
collection DOAJ
description Philosophical orthodoxy holds that Thomas Reid is an externalist concerning epistemic justification, characterizing Reid as holding the key to an externalist response to internalism. These externalist accounts of Reid, however, have neglected his work on prejudice, a heretofore unexamined aspect of his epistemology. Reid’s work on prejudice reveals that he is far from an externalist. Despite the views Reid may have inspired, he exemplifies internalism in opting for an accessibility account of justification. For Reid, there are two normative statuses that a belief might satisfy, being blameless and having a just ground. Through reflection, a rational agent is capable of satisfying both of these statuses, making Reid an accessibility internalist about epistemic justification.
format Article
id doaj-art-75c459c838d34b94acce6f7cdae48d2a
institution Kabale University
issn 2644-0652
language English
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Aperio
record_format Article
series Journal of Modern Philosophy
spelling doaj-art-75c459c838d34b94acce6f7cdae48d2a2025-01-31T16:08:26ZengAperioJournal of Modern Philosophy2644-06522022-04-014010.25894/jmp.2008Thomas Reid, the InternalistRobert Weston Siscoe0 Philosophical orthodoxy holds that Thomas Reid is an externalist concerning epistemic justification, characterizing Reid as holding the key to an externalist response to internalism. These externalist accounts of Reid, however, have neglected his work on prejudice, a heretofore unexamined aspect of his epistemology. Reid’s work on prejudice reveals that he is far from an externalist. Despite the views Reid may have inspired, he exemplifies internalism in opting for an accessibility account of justification. For Reid, there are two normative statuses that a belief might satisfy, being blameless and having a just ground. Through reflection, a rational agent is capable of satisfying both of these statuses, making Reid an accessibility internalist about epistemic justification.https://jmphil.org/article/id/2008/Thomas ReidPrejudiceEpistemic JustificationInternalism vs. Externalism
spellingShingle Robert Weston Siscoe
Thomas Reid, the Internalist
Journal of Modern Philosophy
Thomas Reid
Prejudice
Epistemic Justification
Internalism vs. Externalism
title Thomas Reid, the Internalist
title_full Thomas Reid, the Internalist
title_fullStr Thomas Reid, the Internalist
title_full_unstemmed Thomas Reid, the Internalist
title_short Thomas Reid, the Internalist
title_sort thomas reid the internalist
topic Thomas Reid
Prejudice
Epistemic Justification
Internalism vs. Externalism
url https://jmphil.org/article/id/2008/
work_keys_str_mv AT robertwestonsiscoe thomasreidtheinternalist