Legitimacy of Social Justice in the Terrorism Regulations: Insight from Several Countries
Indonesia continues to experience recidivist terrorism regularly as a result of the injustices it faces. As a result, it is critical to prioritize the legitimacy of social justice for both victims and perpetrators, as well as adopt a humanitarian approach to non-criminal terrorism to mitigate and av...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta
2024-07-01
|
| Series: | Bestuur |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/bestuur/article/view/78576 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832593551293153280 |
|---|---|
| author | Ali Masyhar Rohadhatul Aisy Akhmedova Mehrinigor Bahodirovna Gaini Mukhanova |
| author_facet | Ali Masyhar Rohadhatul Aisy Akhmedova Mehrinigor Bahodirovna Gaini Mukhanova |
| author_sort | Ali Masyhar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Indonesia continues to experience recidivist terrorism regularly as a result of the injustices it faces. As a result, it is critical to prioritize the legitimacy of social justice for both victims and perpetrators, as well as adopt a humanitarian approach to non-criminal terrorism to mitigate and avert criminal acts of terrorism. This research aims to analyze the legitimacy of social justice in counterterrorism environments. This research employs normative juridical research to compare the counterterrorism regulations of several countries that incorporate social justice legitimacy. The findings of this research show that, first, it is crucial to integrate procedural justice and legitimacy principles into counterterrorism initiatives to preserve public confidence in the justice system, prevent exploitation, and uphold human rights. Second, it is critical to compare other countries' terrorism regulations to understand and evaluate their strategies for enhancing international cooperation and preventing terrorist attacks. In response to persistent terrorist threats, the United Kingdom, Pakistan, and the European Union implemented more ambitious counterterrorism strategies and incorporated social justice into their policies. To achieve effective and socially just terrorism regulations, Indonesia must adopt regulations in these countries. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-753d0f0c1c5c451ab4fb0c08e41811e2 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2302-3783 2722-4708 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-07-01 |
| publisher | Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Bestuur |
| spelling | doaj-art-753d0f0c1c5c451ab4fb0c08e41811e22025-01-20T12:13:42ZengFaculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, SurakartaBestuur2302-37832722-47082024-07-01121234810.20961/bestuur.v12i1.7857642400Legitimacy of Social Justice in the Terrorism Regulations: Insight from Several CountriesAli Masyhar0Rohadhatul Aisy1Akhmedova Mehrinigor Bahodirovna2Gaini Mukhanova3Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, SemarangFaculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, SemarangBukhara State UniversityFinancial Monitoring Agency of the Republic of KazakhstanIndonesia continues to experience recidivist terrorism regularly as a result of the injustices it faces. As a result, it is critical to prioritize the legitimacy of social justice for both victims and perpetrators, as well as adopt a humanitarian approach to non-criminal terrorism to mitigate and avert criminal acts of terrorism. This research aims to analyze the legitimacy of social justice in counterterrorism environments. This research employs normative juridical research to compare the counterterrorism regulations of several countries that incorporate social justice legitimacy. The findings of this research show that, first, it is crucial to integrate procedural justice and legitimacy principles into counterterrorism initiatives to preserve public confidence in the justice system, prevent exploitation, and uphold human rights. Second, it is critical to compare other countries' terrorism regulations to understand and evaluate their strategies for enhancing international cooperation and preventing terrorist attacks. In response to persistent terrorist threats, the United Kingdom, Pakistan, and the European Union implemented more ambitious counterterrorism strategies and incorporated social justice into their policies. To achieve effective and socially just terrorism regulations, Indonesia must adopt regulations in these countries.https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/bestuur/article/view/78576justicelegitimacyregulationsterrorism |
| spellingShingle | Ali Masyhar Rohadhatul Aisy Akhmedova Mehrinigor Bahodirovna Gaini Mukhanova Legitimacy of Social Justice in the Terrorism Regulations: Insight from Several Countries Bestuur justice legitimacy regulations terrorism |
| title | Legitimacy of Social Justice in the Terrorism Regulations: Insight from Several Countries |
| title_full | Legitimacy of Social Justice in the Terrorism Regulations: Insight from Several Countries |
| title_fullStr | Legitimacy of Social Justice in the Terrorism Regulations: Insight from Several Countries |
| title_full_unstemmed | Legitimacy of Social Justice in the Terrorism Regulations: Insight from Several Countries |
| title_short | Legitimacy of Social Justice in the Terrorism Regulations: Insight from Several Countries |
| title_sort | legitimacy of social justice in the terrorism regulations insight from several countries |
| topic | justice legitimacy regulations terrorism |
| url | https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/bestuur/article/view/78576 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alimasyhar legitimacyofsocialjusticeintheterrorismregulationsinsightfromseveralcountries AT rohadhatulaisy legitimacyofsocialjusticeintheterrorismregulationsinsightfromseveralcountries AT akhmedovamehrinigorbahodirovna legitimacyofsocialjusticeintheterrorismregulationsinsightfromseveralcountries AT gainimukhanova legitimacyofsocialjusticeintheterrorismregulationsinsightfromseveralcountries |