Public Administration Reform over Time – Did Change Lead to a More Effective Integrity Management?

The following discussion adds to the discourse regarding the relationship between public administration reform and ethics policies. In this theoreti­cal paper, a narrative is employed that re-reads the old Weberian model as a model of ‘institutional integrity’, which is slowly replaced by a public...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christoph Demmke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) 2020-11-01
Series:Central European Public Administration Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20581
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591519835488256
author Christoph Demmke
author_facet Christoph Demmke
author_sort Christoph Demmke
collection DOAJ
description The following discussion adds to the discourse regarding the relationship between public administration reform and ethics policies. In this theoreti­cal paper, a narrative is employed that re-reads the old Weberian model as a model of ‘institutional integrity’, which is slowly replaced by a public management concept that focuses on individual integrity. Whereas the Weberian concept defined institutional integrity as a quality of institu­tions, more recent management concepts define institutional integrity as a quality of public officers within institutions. This also explains why the current focus of attention is ever more on individuals (as the main cause for unethical conduct) and the bad-person model of integrity. An alterna­tive framing of this paper is about ‘institutional ethics’ over time. During the last decades, we are moving from an institutional, but mechanical and rigid Weberian model, to an individual, but more fluid New Public Management model. We are moving towards a version of institutional in­tegrity that tries to use new behavioural mechanism to get back to some Weberian virtues, without its structures and technical focus. This novel ‘integrity management’ movement is really all about filling the gaps left by New Public Management doctrines. However, the reform of integrity management also develops into a specialised, sophisticated and profes­sionalised ethics bureaucracy. Trends are towards ever more broader and stricter integrity requirements. Still, ethics policies are ineffective and shortcomings in implementing integrity policies are neglected.
format Article
id doaj-art-74be6733c5be4c6fafe21294b1e6a00a
institution Kabale University
issn 2591-2240
2591-2259
language English
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
record_format Article
series Central European Public Administration Review
spelling doaj-art-74be6733c5be4c6fafe21294b1e6a00a2025-01-22T10:50:33ZengUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Central European Public Administration Review2591-22402591-22592020-11-0118210.17573/cepar.2020.2.01Public Administration Reform over Time – Did Change Lead to a More Effective Integrity Management?Christoph Demmke0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6589-3127University of Vaasa, Finland The following discussion adds to the discourse regarding the relationship between public administration reform and ethics policies. In this theoreti­cal paper, a narrative is employed that re-reads the old Weberian model as a model of ‘institutional integrity’, which is slowly replaced by a public management concept that focuses on individual integrity. Whereas the Weberian concept defined institutional integrity as a quality of institu­tions, more recent management concepts define institutional integrity as a quality of public officers within institutions. This also explains why the current focus of attention is ever more on individuals (as the main cause for unethical conduct) and the bad-person model of integrity. An alterna­tive framing of this paper is about ‘institutional ethics’ over time. During the last decades, we are moving from an institutional, but mechanical and rigid Weberian model, to an individual, but more fluid New Public Management model. We are moving towards a version of institutional in­tegrity that tries to use new behavioural mechanism to get back to some Weberian virtues, without its structures and technical focus. This novel ‘integrity management’ movement is really all about filling the gaps left by New Public Management doctrines. However, the reform of integrity management also develops into a specialised, sophisticated and profes­sionalised ethics bureaucracy. Trends are towards ever more broader and stricter integrity requirements. Still, ethics policies are ineffective and shortcomings in implementing integrity policies are neglected. https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20581integrity management, ethics, bureaucracy, public management reform, behavioural policies
spellingShingle Christoph Demmke
Public Administration Reform over Time – Did Change Lead to a More Effective Integrity Management?
Central European Public Administration Review
integrity management, ethics, bureaucracy, public management reform, behavioural policies
title Public Administration Reform over Time – Did Change Lead to a More Effective Integrity Management?
title_full Public Administration Reform over Time – Did Change Lead to a More Effective Integrity Management?
title_fullStr Public Administration Reform over Time – Did Change Lead to a More Effective Integrity Management?
title_full_unstemmed Public Administration Reform over Time – Did Change Lead to a More Effective Integrity Management?
title_short Public Administration Reform over Time – Did Change Lead to a More Effective Integrity Management?
title_sort public administration reform over time did change lead to a more effective integrity management
topic integrity management, ethics, bureaucracy, public management reform, behavioural policies
url https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20581
work_keys_str_mv AT christophdemmke publicadministrationreformovertimedidchangeleadtoamoreeffectiveintegritymanagement