Diagnostic Values of Electrochemiluminescent Detection of Urinary CYFRA21‐1 and FDP and Their Combined Detection in Bladder Cancer

ABSTRACT Background Bladder cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the urinary system. The acquisition of urine samples has the advantages of being rapid and painless, and it can directly contact the lesions. It is an ideal source of non‐invasive tumor markers. The problems with urine markers...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhuoran Li, Lu Xia, Yamin Li, Tao Huang, Ning Yang, Shannai Li, Yinyin Luo, Yaoyao Yang, Jian Zhang, Song Wu, Qifang Lei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-08-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71056
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849331468081299456
author Zhuoran Li
Lu Xia
Yamin Li
Tao Huang
Ning Yang
Shannai Li
Yinyin Luo
Yaoyao Yang
Jian Zhang
Song Wu
Qifang Lei
author_facet Zhuoran Li
Lu Xia
Yamin Li
Tao Huang
Ning Yang
Shannai Li
Yinyin Luo
Yaoyao Yang
Jian Zhang
Song Wu
Qifang Lei
author_sort Zhuoran Li
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background Bladder cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the urinary system. The acquisition of urine samples has the advantages of being rapid and painless, and it can directly contact the lesions. It is an ideal source of non‐invasive tumor markers. The problems with urine markers are low specificity, the propensity for false positives or missed detections, and there is no unified diagnostic standard to measure the test results, which limits the clinical application of urine markers. In this study, we evaluate the diagnostic values of Cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21‐1), Fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) and CYFRA21‐1 + FDP in bladder cancer, with the objective to expand the application scope of urinary tumor markers in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. Methods We evaluated the performances of the CYFRA21‐1 assay kit (electrochemiluminescence) and/or FDP assay kit (electrochemiluminescence) in detecting bladder cancer. CYFRA21‐1 and FDP levels were determined in urine samples from 467 participants in South China Hospital of Shenzhen University and Shenzhen Luohu People's Hospital. We performed performance validation of the CYFRA21‐1 and FDP kits, established normal biological reference intervals, and finally analyzed the data to assess their diagnostic efficacies alone or in combination. Results The bladder cancer group had significantly higher urinary levels of CYFRA21‐1 and FDP than the control group. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC‐AUCs) of CYFRA21‐1, FDP, and CYFRA21‐1 + FDP were 0.929, 0.857, and 0.935, respectively, for discriminating bladder cancer cases from controls. The ROC‐AUC of CYFRA21‐1 and FDP in combination was higher than that of any index alone. Conclusions Both CYFRA21‐1 and FDP have good diagnostic values in predicting bladder cancer. In addition, combined detection of urinary CYFRA21‐1 and FDP by electrochemiluminescence has better differentiation ability compared with each index alone and may be used for early screening and recurrence monitoring in bladder cancer.
format Article
id doaj-art-73cd9c331cfc482bbda2f35b76c460df
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7634
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj-art-73cd9c331cfc482bbda2f35b76c460df2025-08-20T03:46:34ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342025-08-011415n/an/a10.1002/cam4.71056Diagnostic Values of Electrochemiluminescent Detection of Urinary CYFRA21‐1 and FDP and Their Combined Detection in Bladder CancerZhuoran Li0Lu Xia1Yamin Li2Tao Huang3Ning Yang4Shannai Li5Yinyin Luo6Yaoyao Yang7Jian Zhang8Song Wu9Qifang Lei10Department of Urology, Medical School, South China Hospital Shenzhen University Shenzhen PR ChinaDepartment of Urology, Medical School, South China Hospital Shenzhen University Shenzhen PR ChinaShenzhen Lifotronic Technology Co., Ltd. Shenzhen PR ChinaDepartment of Urology, Medical School, South China Hospital Shenzhen University Shenzhen PR ChinaShenzhen Lifotronic Technology Co., Ltd. Shenzhen PR ChinaShenzhen Lifotronic Technology Co., Ltd. Shenzhen PR ChinaShenzhen Lifotronic Technology Co., Ltd. Shenzhen PR ChinaDepartment of Central Laboratory Binzhou People's Hospital Binzhou PR ChinaDepartment of Central Laboratory Binzhou People's Hospital Binzhou PR ChinaDepartment of Urology, Medical School, South China Hospital Shenzhen University Shenzhen PR ChinaDepartment of Urology, Medical School, South China Hospital Shenzhen University Shenzhen PR ChinaABSTRACT Background Bladder cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the urinary system. The acquisition of urine samples has the advantages of being rapid and painless, and it can directly contact the lesions. It is an ideal source of non‐invasive tumor markers. The problems with urine markers are low specificity, the propensity for false positives or missed detections, and there is no unified diagnostic standard to measure the test results, which limits the clinical application of urine markers. In this study, we evaluate the diagnostic values of Cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21‐1), Fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) and CYFRA21‐1 + FDP in bladder cancer, with the objective to expand the application scope of urinary tumor markers in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. Methods We evaluated the performances of the CYFRA21‐1 assay kit (electrochemiluminescence) and/or FDP assay kit (electrochemiluminescence) in detecting bladder cancer. CYFRA21‐1 and FDP levels were determined in urine samples from 467 participants in South China Hospital of Shenzhen University and Shenzhen Luohu People's Hospital. We performed performance validation of the CYFRA21‐1 and FDP kits, established normal biological reference intervals, and finally analyzed the data to assess their diagnostic efficacies alone or in combination. Results The bladder cancer group had significantly higher urinary levels of CYFRA21‐1 and FDP than the control group. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC‐AUCs) of CYFRA21‐1, FDP, and CYFRA21‐1 + FDP were 0.929, 0.857, and 0.935, respectively, for discriminating bladder cancer cases from controls. The ROC‐AUC of CYFRA21‐1 and FDP in combination was higher than that of any index alone. Conclusions Both CYFRA21‐1 and FDP have good diagnostic values in predicting bladder cancer. In addition, combined detection of urinary CYFRA21‐1 and FDP by electrochemiluminescence has better differentiation ability compared with each index alone and may be used for early screening and recurrence monitoring in bladder cancer.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71056bladder cancercombined detectionCYFRA21‐1electrochemiluminescenceFDP
spellingShingle Zhuoran Li
Lu Xia
Yamin Li
Tao Huang
Ning Yang
Shannai Li
Yinyin Luo
Yaoyao Yang
Jian Zhang
Song Wu
Qifang Lei
Diagnostic Values of Electrochemiluminescent Detection of Urinary CYFRA21‐1 and FDP and Their Combined Detection in Bladder Cancer
Cancer Medicine
bladder cancer
combined detection
CYFRA21‐1
electrochemiluminescence
FDP
title Diagnostic Values of Electrochemiluminescent Detection of Urinary CYFRA21‐1 and FDP and Their Combined Detection in Bladder Cancer
title_full Diagnostic Values of Electrochemiluminescent Detection of Urinary CYFRA21‐1 and FDP and Their Combined Detection in Bladder Cancer
title_fullStr Diagnostic Values of Electrochemiluminescent Detection of Urinary CYFRA21‐1 and FDP and Their Combined Detection in Bladder Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Values of Electrochemiluminescent Detection of Urinary CYFRA21‐1 and FDP and Their Combined Detection in Bladder Cancer
title_short Diagnostic Values of Electrochemiluminescent Detection of Urinary CYFRA21‐1 and FDP and Their Combined Detection in Bladder Cancer
title_sort diagnostic values of electrochemiluminescent detection of urinary cyfra21 1 and fdp and their combined detection in bladder cancer
topic bladder cancer
combined detection
CYFRA21‐1
electrochemiluminescence
FDP
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71056
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuoranli diagnosticvaluesofelectrochemiluminescentdetectionofurinarycyfra211andfdpandtheircombineddetectioninbladdercancer
AT luxia diagnosticvaluesofelectrochemiluminescentdetectionofurinarycyfra211andfdpandtheircombineddetectioninbladdercancer
AT yaminli diagnosticvaluesofelectrochemiluminescentdetectionofurinarycyfra211andfdpandtheircombineddetectioninbladdercancer
AT taohuang diagnosticvaluesofelectrochemiluminescentdetectionofurinarycyfra211andfdpandtheircombineddetectioninbladdercancer
AT ningyang diagnosticvaluesofelectrochemiluminescentdetectionofurinarycyfra211andfdpandtheircombineddetectioninbladdercancer
AT shannaili diagnosticvaluesofelectrochemiluminescentdetectionofurinarycyfra211andfdpandtheircombineddetectioninbladdercancer
AT yinyinluo diagnosticvaluesofelectrochemiluminescentdetectionofurinarycyfra211andfdpandtheircombineddetectioninbladdercancer
AT yaoyaoyang diagnosticvaluesofelectrochemiluminescentdetectionofurinarycyfra211andfdpandtheircombineddetectioninbladdercancer
AT jianzhang diagnosticvaluesofelectrochemiluminescentdetectionofurinarycyfra211andfdpandtheircombineddetectioninbladdercancer
AT songwu diagnosticvaluesofelectrochemiluminescentdetectionofurinarycyfra211andfdpandtheircombineddetectioninbladdercancer
AT qifanglei diagnosticvaluesofelectrochemiluminescentdetectionofurinarycyfra211andfdpandtheircombineddetectioninbladdercancer