How trustworthy and applicable is the evidence from systematic reviews of depression treatments: Protocol for systematic examination
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Iwo Fober, Lidia Baran, Myrto Samara, Spyridon Siafis, David Robert Grimes, Bartosz Helfer |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143501/?tool=EBI |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological interventions for schizophrenia non-responsive to prior treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysisResearch in context
by: Myrto Samara, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
How do voice acoustics affect the perceived trustworthiness of a speaker? A systematic review
by: Constantina Maltezou-Papastylianou, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Blockchain-Based Evidence Trustworthiness System in Certification
by: Cristina Regueiro, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Evidence map of nutrient interventions for major depression: a systematic review protocol
by: Dongbo Zhang, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
An integrative systematic review on interventions to improve layperson's ability to identify trustworthy digital health information.
by: Hind Mohamed, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01)