Functional Connectivity Pattern Analysis Underlying Neural Oscillation Synchronization during Deception
To characterize system cognitive processes during deception, event-related coherence was computed to investigate the functional connectivity among brain regions underlying neural oscillation synchronization. In this study, 15 participants were randomly assigned to honesty or deception groups and wer...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Neural Plasticity |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2684821 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832549583622766592 |
|---|---|
| author | Peng Liu Hongkui Shen Shumei Ji |
| author_facet | Peng Liu Hongkui Shen Shumei Ji |
| author_sort | Peng Liu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | To characterize system cognitive processes during deception, event-related coherence was computed to investigate the functional connectivity among brain regions underlying neural oscillation synchronization. In this study, 15 participants were randomly assigned to honesty or deception groups and were instructed to tell the truth or lie when facing certain stimuli. Meanwhile, event-related potential signals were recorded using a 64-channel electroencephalography cap. Event-related coherence was computed separately in four frequency bands (delta (1-3.5 Hz), theta (4-7 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), and beta (14-30 HZ)) for the long-range intrahemispheric electrode pairs (F3P3, F4P4, F3T7, F4T8, F3O1, and F4O2). The results indicated that deceptive responses elicited greater connectivities in the frontoparietal and frontotemporal networks than in the frontooccipital network. Furthermore, the deception group displayed lower values of coherence in the frontoparietal electrode pairs in the alpha and beta bands than the honesty group. In particular, increased coherence in the delta and theta bands on specific left frontoparietal electrode pairs was observed. Additionally, the deception group exhibited higher values of coherence in the delta band and lower values of coherence in the beta band on the frontotemporal electrode pairs than did the honesty group. These data indicated that the active cognitive processes during deception include changes in ensemble activities between the frontal and parietal/temporal regions. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-73a8d7c1617542ea91d07569f4008806 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2090-5904 1687-5443 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Neural Plasticity |
| spelling | doaj-art-73a8d7c1617542ea91d07569f40088062025-02-03T06:10:59ZengWileyNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432019-01-01201910.1155/2019/26848212684821Functional Connectivity Pattern Analysis Underlying Neural Oscillation Synchronization during DeceptionPeng Liu0Hongkui Shen1Shumei Ji2Department of Psychology, Institute of Education Sciences, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen, ChinaNetwork Information Center, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, ChinaTo characterize system cognitive processes during deception, event-related coherence was computed to investigate the functional connectivity among brain regions underlying neural oscillation synchronization. In this study, 15 participants were randomly assigned to honesty or deception groups and were instructed to tell the truth or lie when facing certain stimuli. Meanwhile, event-related potential signals were recorded using a 64-channel electroencephalography cap. Event-related coherence was computed separately in four frequency bands (delta (1-3.5 Hz), theta (4-7 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), and beta (14-30 HZ)) for the long-range intrahemispheric electrode pairs (F3P3, F4P4, F3T7, F4T8, F3O1, and F4O2). The results indicated that deceptive responses elicited greater connectivities in the frontoparietal and frontotemporal networks than in the frontooccipital network. Furthermore, the deception group displayed lower values of coherence in the frontoparietal electrode pairs in the alpha and beta bands than the honesty group. In particular, increased coherence in the delta and theta bands on specific left frontoparietal electrode pairs was observed. Additionally, the deception group exhibited higher values of coherence in the delta band and lower values of coherence in the beta band on the frontotemporal electrode pairs than did the honesty group. These data indicated that the active cognitive processes during deception include changes in ensemble activities between the frontal and parietal/temporal regions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2684821 |
| spellingShingle | Peng Liu Hongkui Shen Shumei Ji Functional Connectivity Pattern Analysis Underlying Neural Oscillation Synchronization during Deception Neural Plasticity |
| title | Functional Connectivity Pattern Analysis Underlying Neural Oscillation Synchronization during Deception |
| title_full | Functional Connectivity Pattern Analysis Underlying Neural Oscillation Synchronization during Deception |
| title_fullStr | Functional Connectivity Pattern Analysis Underlying Neural Oscillation Synchronization during Deception |
| title_full_unstemmed | Functional Connectivity Pattern Analysis Underlying Neural Oscillation Synchronization during Deception |
| title_short | Functional Connectivity Pattern Analysis Underlying Neural Oscillation Synchronization during Deception |
| title_sort | functional connectivity pattern analysis underlying neural oscillation synchronization during deception |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2684821 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pengliu functionalconnectivitypatternanalysisunderlyingneuraloscillationsynchronizationduringdeception AT hongkuishen functionalconnectivitypatternanalysisunderlyingneuraloscillationsynchronizationduringdeception AT shumeiji functionalconnectivitypatternanalysisunderlyingneuraloscillationsynchronizationduringdeception |