Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system
BackgroundArrhythmias are prevalent cardiac disorders with significant impacts on patient quality of life and mortality. Amiodarone, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, is widely used to manage both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias due to its efficacy in prolonging the cardiac action potential and i...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Pharmacology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1517616/full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832584999491076096 |
---|---|
author | Jingrong Yang Mengfan You Jingxin Wang Rongfei Sun Lili Han Xiaonan Liu Kaibin Niu Kaidi Xing Juanping Sun Wenge Su Yifei Wang |
author_facet | Jingrong Yang Mengfan You Jingxin Wang Rongfei Sun Lili Han Xiaonan Liu Kaibin Niu Kaidi Xing Juanping Sun Wenge Su Yifei Wang |
author_sort | Jingrong Yang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | BackgroundArrhythmias are prevalent cardiac disorders with significant impacts on patient quality of life and mortality. Amiodarone, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, is widely used to manage both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias due to its efficacy in prolonging the cardiac action potential and its multiple antiarrhythmic properties. While clinical trials have highlighted the safety and efficacy of amiodarone, there is limited real-world data on adverse events (AEs) associated with different administration routes. This study aims to address this gap by utilizing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate the spectrum and timing of AEs related to amiodarone administration through disproportionality analysis and stratification methods.MethodsData from the FAERS database were analyzed using disproportionality analysis and reporting odds ratio (ROR) methods for comparative analysis, and the Weibull distribution for time-to-adverse-event analysis. The study examined data from 2004 through the first quarter of 2024 to analyze adverse event signals and the time of occurrence between intravenous and oral amiodarone administration.ResultsA total of 16,749 records of adverse reactions associated with amiodarone were identified. Among these, 2,412 events were related to intravenous amiodarone, and 8,220 events were related to oral amiodarone. The analysis revealed that cardiac and hepatic AEs were more common with intravenous administration, while pulmonary and thyroid-related AEs were more frequent with oral administration. Furthermore, the onset of adverse reactions varied significantly between the routes. The Weibull distribution analysis showed a median onset time of 5 days for intravenous administration compared to 74 days for oral administration. Both routes exhibited early failure-type signals, indicating a decreasing risk of AEs over time.ConclusionAmiodarone exhibits varying adverse drug reactions and onset times across different routes of administration. Clinicians should carefully consider these differences when selecting the administration route to balance the risks of adverse reactions with therapeutic benefits. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-733814ca482c495fa2238c6abd82e96f |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1663-9812 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Pharmacology |
spelling | doaj-art-733814ca482c495fa2238c6abd82e96f2025-01-27T06:41:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122025-01-011610.3389/fphar.2025.15176161517616Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting systemJingrong Yang0Mengfan You1Jingxin Wang2Rongfei Sun3Lili Han4Xiaonan Liu5Kaibin Niu6Kaidi Xing7Juanping Sun8Wenge Su9Yifei Wang10Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaAffiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaHeart Center, Shandong Public Health Clinical Center, Jinan, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Zhangdian District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zibo, ChinaShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaBackgroundArrhythmias are prevalent cardiac disorders with significant impacts on patient quality of life and mortality. Amiodarone, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, is widely used to manage both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias due to its efficacy in prolonging the cardiac action potential and its multiple antiarrhythmic properties. While clinical trials have highlighted the safety and efficacy of amiodarone, there is limited real-world data on adverse events (AEs) associated with different administration routes. This study aims to address this gap by utilizing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate the spectrum and timing of AEs related to amiodarone administration through disproportionality analysis and stratification methods.MethodsData from the FAERS database were analyzed using disproportionality analysis and reporting odds ratio (ROR) methods for comparative analysis, and the Weibull distribution for time-to-adverse-event analysis. The study examined data from 2004 through the first quarter of 2024 to analyze adverse event signals and the time of occurrence between intravenous and oral amiodarone administration.ResultsA total of 16,749 records of adverse reactions associated with amiodarone were identified. Among these, 2,412 events were related to intravenous amiodarone, and 8,220 events were related to oral amiodarone. The analysis revealed that cardiac and hepatic AEs were more common with intravenous administration, while pulmonary and thyroid-related AEs were more frequent with oral administration. Furthermore, the onset of adverse reactions varied significantly between the routes. The Weibull distribution analysis showed a median onset time of 5 days for intravenous administration compared to 74 days for oral administration. Both routes exhibited early failure-type signals, indicating a decreasing risk of AEs over time.ConclusionAmiodarone exhibits varying adverse drug reactions and onset times across different routes of administration. Clinicians should carefully consider these differences when selecting the administration route to balance the risks of adverse reactions with therapeutic benefits.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1517616/fullamiodaroneoralintravenousFDAadverse events |
spellingShingle | Jingrong Yang Mengfan You Jingxin Wang Rongfei Sun Lili Han Xiaonan Liu Kaibin Niu Kaidi Xing Juanping Sun Wenge Su Yifei Wang Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system Frontiers in Pharmacology amiodarone oral intravenous FDA adverse events |
title | Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system |
title_full | Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system |
title_fullStr | Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system |
title_full_unstemmed | Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system |
title_short | Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system |
title_sort | adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone a pharmacovigilance study based on the fda adverse event reporting system |
topic | amiodarone oral intravenous FDA adverse events |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1517616/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jingrongyang adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem AT mengfanyou adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem AT jingxinwang adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem AT rongfeisun adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem AT lilihan adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem AT xiaonanliu adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem AT kaibinniu adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem AT kaidixing adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem AT juanpingsun adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem AT wengesu adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem AT yifeiwang adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem |