Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system

BackgroundArrhythmias are prevalent cardiac disorders with significant impacts on patient quality of life and mortality. Amiodarone, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, is widely used to manage both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias due to its efficacy in prolonging the cardiac action potential and i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jingrong Yang, Mengfan You, Jingxin Wang, Rongfei Sun, Lili Han, Xiaonan Liu, Kaibin Niu, Kaidi Xing, Juanping Sun, Wenge Su, Yifei Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1517616/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584999491076096
author Jingrong Yang
Mengfan You
Jingxin Wang
Rongfei Sun
Lili Han
Xiaonan Liu
Kaibin Niu
Kaidi Xing
Juanping Sun
Wenge Su
Yifei Wang
author_facet Jingrong Yang
Mengfan You
Jingxin Wang
Rongfei Sun
Lili Han
Xiaonan Liu
Kaibin Niu
Kaidi Xing
Juanping Sun
Wenge Su
Yifei Wang
author_sort Jingrong Yang
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundArrhythmias are prevalent cardiac disorders with significant impacts on patient quality of life and mortality. Amiodarone, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, is widely used to manage both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias due to its efficacy in prolonging the cardiac action potential and its multiple antiarrhythmic properties. While clinical trials have highlighted the safety and efficacy of amiodarone, there is limited real-world data on adverse events (AEs) associated with different administration routes. This study aims to address this gap by utilizing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate the spectrum and timing of AEs related to amiodarone administration through disproportionality analysis and stratification methods.MethodsData from the FAERS database were analyzed using disproportionality analysis and reporting odds ratio (ROR) methods for comparative analysis, and the Weibull distribution for time-to-adverse-event analysis. The study examined data from 2004 through the first quarter of 2024 to analyze adverse event signals and the time of occurrence between intravenous and oral amiodarone administration.ResultsA total of 16,749 records of adverse reactions associated with amiodarone were identified. Among these, 2,412 events were related to intravenous amiodarone, and 8,220 events were related to oral amiodarone. The analysis revealed that cardiac and hepatic AEs were more common with intravenous administration, while pulmonary and thyroid-related AEs were more frequent with oral administration. Furthermore, the onset of adverse reactions varied significantly between the routes. The Weibull distribution analysis showed a median onset time of 5 days for intravenous administration compared to 74 days for oral administration. Both routes exhibited early failure-type signals, indicating a decreasing risk of AEs over time.ConclusionAmiodarone exhibits varying adverse drug reactions and onset times across different routes of administration. Clinicians should carefully consider these differences when selecting the administration route to balance the risks of adverse reactions with therapeutic benefits.
format Article
id doaj-art-733814ca482c495fa2238c6abd82e96f
institution Kabale University
issn 1663-9812
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj-art-733814ca482c495fa2238c6abd82e96f2025-01-27T06:41:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122025-01-011610.3389/fphar.2025.15176161517616Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting systemJingrong Yang0Mengfan You1Jingxin Wang2Rongfei Sun3Lili Han4Xiaonan Liu5Kaibin Niu6Kaidi Xing7Juanping Sun8Wenge Su9Yifei Wang10Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaAffiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaHeart Center, Shandong Public Health Clinical Center, Jinan, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Zhangdian District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zibo, ChinaShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaBackgroundArrhythmias are prevalent cardiac disorders with significant impacts on patient quality of life and mortality. Amiodarone, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, is widely used to manage both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias due to its efficacy in prolonging the cardiac action potential and its multiple antiarrhythmic properties. While clinical trials have highlighted the safety and efficacy of amiodarone, there is limited real-world data on adverse events (AEs) associated with different administration routes. This study aims to address this gap by utilizing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate the spectrum and timing of AEs related to amiodarone administration through disproportionality analysis and stratification methods.MethodsData from the FAERS database were analyzed using disproportionality analysis and reporting odds ratio (ROR) methods for comparative analysis, and the Weibull distribution for time-to-adverse-event analysis. The study examined data from 2004 through the first quarter of 2024 to analyze adverse event signals and the time of occurrence between intravenous and oral amiodarone administration.ResultsA total of 16,749 records of adverse reactions associated with amiodarone were identified. Among these, 2,412 events were related to intravenous amiodarone, and 8,220 events were related to oral amiodarone. The analysis revealed that cardiac and hepatic AEs were more common with intravenous administration, while pulmonary and thyroid-related AEs were more frequent with oral administration. Furthermore, the onset of adverse reactions varied significantly between the routes. The Weibull distribution analysis showed a median onset time of 5 days for intravenous administration compared to 74 days for oral administration. Both routes exhibited early failure-type signals, indicating a decreasing risk of AEs over time.ConclusionAmiodarone exhibits varying adverse drug reactions and onset times across different routes of administration. Clinicians should carefully consider these differences when selecting the administration route to balance the risks of adverse reactions with therapeutic benefits.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1517616/fullamiodaroneoralintravenousFDAadverse events
spellingShingle Jingrong Yang
Mengfan You
Jingxin Wang
Rongfei Sun
Lili Han
Xiaonan Liu
Kaibin Niu
Kaidi Xing
Juanping Sun
Wenge Su
Yifei Wang
Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system
Frontiers in Pharmacology
amiodarone
oral
intravenous
FDA
adverse events
title Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system
title_full Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system
title_fullStr Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system
title_full_unstemmed Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system
title_short Adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system
title_sort adverse events in different administration routes of amiodarone a pharmacovigilance study based on the fda adverse event reporting system
topic amiodarone
oral
intravenous
FDA
adverse events
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1517616/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jingrongyang adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem
AT mengfanyou adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem
AT jingxinwang adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem
AT rongfeisun adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem
AT lilihan adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem
AT xiaonanliu adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem
AT kaibinniu adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem
AT kaidixing adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem
AT juanpingsun adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem
AT wengesu adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem
AT yifeiwang adverseeventsindifferentadministrationroutesofamiodaroneapharmacovigilancestudybasedonthefdaadverseeventreportingsystem