Risk of bias and reporting completeness of randomised controlled trials in burn care: protocol for a systematic review
Introduction Burn care represents a healthcare and economic burden to patients internationally. Choice of the most clinically effective treatment strategies requires evidence which is best obtained through high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCT). The number of published RCTs of burn care is...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Barnaby C Reeves, Jane Blazeby, Anna Davies, Amber Young, Hung-Yuan Cheng, Jason Wasiak, Duncan Muir |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019-12-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/12/e033472.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Exploring evidence gaps in clinical trials in thermal burns care: an umbrella review
by: Sarah Dawson, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Status, reporting completeness and methodological quality of pilot randomised controlled trials in acupuncture: protocol for a systematic review
by: Jianqiao Fang, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01) -
A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials
by: Ameer Hohlfeld, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Cognitive bias modification for interpretation (CBM-I) for post-traumatic stress disorder: study protocol of an app-based randomised controlled trial
by: Julia Kroener, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Cognitive-bias modification intervention to improve physical activity in patients following a rehabilitation programme: protocol for the randomised controlled IMPACT trial
by: Stéphane Cullati, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)