Safety of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in a Low-Volume Setting: Review of Early and Late Outcome

Background. There is increasing evidence suggesting that the laparoscopic technique is the treatment of choice for large bowel resection, including for malignancy. The purpose of the study was to assess whether general surgeons, with particular skills in advanced laparoscopy, can adequately provide...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert C. Gandy, Christophe R. Berney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/581523
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554361857769472
author Robert C. Gandy
Christophe R. Berney
author_facet Robert C. Gandy
Christophe R. Berney
author_sort Robert C. Gandy
collection DOAJ
description Background. There is increasing evidence suggesting that the laparoscopic technique is the treatment of choice for large bowel resection, including for malignancy. The purpose of the study was to assess whether general surgeons, with particular skills in advanced laparoscopy, can adequately provide safe laparoscopic colorectal resections in a low-volume setting. Methods. A retrospective review of prospectively collected case series of all laparoscopic colorectal resections performed under the care of a single general surgeon is presented. The primary endpoint was postoperative clinical outcome in terms of morbidity and mortality. Secondary endpoints were adequacy of surgical margins and number of lymph nodes harvested for colorectal cancer cases. Results. Seventy-three patients underwent 75 laparoscopic resections between March, 2003, and May, 2011. There was no elective mortality and the overall 30-day postoperative morbidity was 9.3%. Conversion and anastomotic leakage rates were both 1.3%, respectively. None of the malignant cases had positive margins and the median number of lymph nodes retrieved was 17. Conclusions. Our results support the view that general surgeons with advanced skills in minimally invasive surgery may safely perform laparoscopic colorectal resection in a low-volume setting in carefully selected patient cases.
format Article
id doaj-art-71d9886011104b75be91cf31138bada3
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-71d9886011104b75be91cf31138bada32025-02-03T05:51:43ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/581523581523Safety of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in a Low-Volume Setting: Review of Early and Late OutcomeRobert C. Gandy0Christophe R. Berney1Department of Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, University of New South Wales, Eldridge Road, Bankstown, NSW 2200, AustraliaDepartment of Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, University of New South Wales, Eldridge Road, Bankstown, NSW 2200, AustraliaBackground. There is increasing evidence suggesting that the laparoscopic technique is the treatment of choice for large bowel resection, including for malignancy. The purpose of the study was to assess whether general surgeons, with particular skills in advanced laparoscopy, can adequately provide safe laparoscopic colorectal resections in a low-volume setting. Methods. A retrospective review of prospectively collected case series of all laparoscopic colorectal resections performed under the care of a single general surgeon is presented. The primary endpoint was postoperative clinical outcome in terms of morbidity and mortality. Secondary endpoints were adequacy of surgical margins and number of lymph nodes harvested for colorectal cancer cases. Results. Seventy-three patients underwent 75 laparoscopic resections between March, 2003, and May, 2011. There was no elective mortality and the overall 30-day postoperative morbidity was 9.3%. Conversion and anastomotic leakage rates were both 1.3%, respectively. None of the malignant cases had positive margins and the median number of lymph nodes retrieved was 17. Conclusions. Our results support the view that general surgeons with advanced skills in minimally invasive surgery may safely perform laparoscopic colorectal resection in a low-volume setting in carefully selected patient cases.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/581523
spellingShingle Robert C. Gandy
Christophe R. Berney
Safety of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in a Low-Volume Setting: Review of Early and Late Outcome
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
title Safety of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in a Low-Volume Setting: Review of Early and Late Outcome
title_full Safety of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in a Low-Volume Setting: Review of Early and Late Outcome
title_fullStr Safety of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in a Low-Volume Setting: Review of Early and Late Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Safety of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in a Low-Volume Setting: Review of Early and Late Outcome
title_short Safety of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in a Low-Volume Setting: Review of Early and Late Outcome
title_sort safety of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a low volume setting review of early and late outcome
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/581523
work_keys_str_mv AT robertcgandy safetyoflaparoscopiccolorectalsurgeryinalowvolumesettingreviewofearlyandlateoutcome
AT christopherberney safetyoflaparoscopiccolorectalsurgeryinalowvolumesettingreviewofearlyandlateoutcome