Machine Learning for the Early Prediction of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BackgroundDelayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a primary contributor to death after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), with significant incidence. Therefore, early determination of the risk of DCI is an urgent need. Machine learning (ML) has received much attention in clinical prac...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JMIR Publications
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e54121 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | BackgroundDelayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a primary contributor to death after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), with significant incidence. Therefore, early determination of the risk of DCI is an urgent need. Machine learning (ML) has received much attention in clinical practice. Recently, some studies have attempted to apply ML models for early noninvasive prediction of DCI. However, systematic evidence for its predictive accuracy is still lacking.
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to synthesize the prediction accuracy of ML models for DCI to provide evidence for the development or updating of intelligent detection tools.
MethodsPubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched up to May 18, 2023. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using PROBAST (Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool). During the analysis, we discussed the performance of different models in the training and validation sets.
ResultsWe finally included 48 studies containing 16,294 patients with SAH and 71 ML models with logistic regression as the main model type. In the training set, the pooled concordance index (C index), sensitivity, and specificity of all the models were 0.786 (95% CI 0.737-0.835), 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.84), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.89), respectively, while those of the logistic regression models were 0.770 (95% CI 0.724-0.817), 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.82), and 0.71 (95% CI 0.63-0.78), respectively. In the validation set, the pooled C index, sensitivity, and specificity of all the models were 0.767 (95% CI 0.741-0.793), 0.66 (95% CI 0.53-0.77), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.71-0.84), respectively, while those of the logistic regression models were 0.757 (95% CI 0.715-0.800), 0.59 (95% CI 0.57-0.80), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.87), respectively.
ConclusionsML models appear to have relatively desirable power for early noninvasive prediction of DCI after SAH. However, enhancing the prediction sensitivity of these models is challenging. Therefore, efficient, noninvasive, or minimally invasive low-cost predictors should be further explored in future studies to improve the prediction accuracy of ML models.
Trial RegistrationPROSPERO (CRD42023438399); https://tinyurl.com/yfuuudde |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1438-8871 |