Comparative review of allowances types for dividing a benefit with indivisible items
The article studies the issues related to the problem of sharing by two beneficiaries of a resource with a set of indivisible components. Several types of sharing that consider “envy” and realize it, including through compensatory payments to the beneficiary who does not get the corresponding indivisi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Publishing House of the State University of Management
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Вестник университета |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://vestnik.guu.ru/jour/article/view/5610 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832541409758937088 |
|---|---|
| author | V. V. Egorov |
| author_facet | V. V. Egorov |
| author_sort | V. V. Egorov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article studies the issues related to the problem of sharing by two beneficiaries of a resource with a set of indivisible components. Several types of sharing that consider “envy” and realize it, including through compensatory payments to the beneficiary who does not get the corresponding indivisible component of the resource, have been noted. The difference between the values of possible bonuses at different types of sharing, which are received in addition to the values declared by the beneficiaries, and indivisible components when they are evaluated, has been determined. It has been found in which case it is more favorable for the beneficiary if “envy” is not considered, and vice versa. The method of setting the degree of preference of considering “envy” in the course of distribution of resource components has been proposed, assuming a preliminary agreement of beneficiaries on the use of this method. The result of using it has been analyzed, based on which recommendations to the beneficiaries are formulated, implying additional awareness not covered in the present study. In order to circumvent the issue of uninformedness, indications of one option of its solution have been presented, which can be considered also as possible future directions of research of stochastic nature. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-71589fcf260b4eb4a8d088d196807d5b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1816-4277 2686-8415 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Publishing House of the State University of Management |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Вестник университета |
| spelling | doaj-art-71589fcf260b4eb4a8d088d196807d5b2025-02-04T08:28:23ZengPublishing House of the State University of ManagementВестник университета1816-42772686-84152024-12-01010929910.26425/1816-4277-2024-10-92-993231Comparative review of allowances types for dividing a benefit with indivisible itemsV. V. Egorov0State University of ManagementThe article studies the issues related to the problem of sharing by two beneficiaries of a resource with a set of indivisible components. Several types of sharing that consider “envy” and realize it, including through compensatory payments to the beneficiary who does not get the corresponding indivisible component of the resource, have been noted. The difference between the values of possible bonuses at different types of sharing, which are received in addition to the values declared by the beneficiaries, and indivisible components when they are evaluated, has been determined. It has been found in which case it is more favorable for the beneficiary if “envy” is not considered, and vice versa. The method of setting the degree of preference of considering “envy” in the course of distribution of resource components has been proposed, assuming a preliminary agreement of beneficiaries on the use of this method. The result of using it has been analyzed, based on which recommendations to the beneficiaries are formulated, implying additional awareness not covered in the present study. In order to circumvent the issue of uninformedness, indications of one option of its solution have been presented, which can be considered also as possible future directions of research of stochastic nature.https://vestnik.guu.ru/jour/article/view/5610divisionbenefits distributionindivisible componentsreconciliation of interestscompromisecompensationdecision-making |
| spellingShingle | V. V. Egorov Comparative review of allowances types for dividing a benefit with indivisible items Вестник университета division benefits distribution indivisible components reconciliation of interests compromise compensation decision-making |
| title | Comparative review of allowances types for dividing a benefit with indivisible items |
| title_full | Comparative review of allowances types for dividing a benefit with indivisible items |
| title_fullStr | Comparative review of allowances types for dividing a benefit with indivisible items |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative review of allowances types for dividing a benefit with indivisible items |
| title_short | Comparative review of allowances types for dividing a benefit with indivisible items |
| title_sort | comparative review of allowances types for dividing a benefit with indivisible items |
| topic | division benefits distribution indivisible components reconciliation of interests compromise compensation decision-making |
| url | https://vestnik.guu.ru/jour/article/view/5610 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vvegorov comparativereviewofallowancestypesfordividingabenefitwithindivisibleitems |