Mass resection as a candidate treatment for uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential: a case report and literature review

BackgroundPerivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas) occurring in the uterus are rare, with surgery being the most recommended primary treatment for malignant cases. This study aims to provide clinical guidance on the clinicopathological features and appropriate treatment options for patients w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haijuan Shi, Yan Yin, Shoujun Liang, Chuanzhong Liu, Yibao Huang, Bingfeng Lu, Liying Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1521253/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584998125830144
author Haijuan Shi
Yan Yin
Shoujun Liang
Chuanzhong Liu
Yibao Huang
Bingfeng Lu
Liying Zhang
author_facet Haijuan Shi
Yan Yin
Shoujun Liang
Chuanzhong Liu
Yibao Huang
Bingfeng Lu
Liying Zhang
author_sort Haijuan Shi
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundPerivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas) occurring in the uterus are rare, with surgery being the most recommended primary treatment for malignant cases. This study aims to provide clinical guidance on the clinicopathological features and appropriate treatment options for patients with uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential.CasesThis case series summarises the clinical courses of 13 patients diagnosed with uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential, including clinical and pathological data as well as their outcomes. We identified one case at our hospital, and data for the other 12 cases were extracted from the PubMed database. The 13 patients were aged 9–75 years, with tumour sizes ranging from 1 to 21 cm, and follow-up times ranging from 2 to 71 months. The most common signs and symptoms included abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and abdominal pain. Most of the patients (11/13) were managed surgically without any chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Except for the patients who were lost to follow-up, 11 patients were free of any recurrence or metastasis at their last follow-up. Patients with group A tumours (abundant HMB45 expression) had a longer disease-free survival than those with group B tumours.ConclusionsSurgery alone may be appropriate for uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential. Surgical treatment plans should consider the patient’s age, fertility requirements, and personal preferences. Mass resection is a viable treatment option for fertility preservation in reproductive-age patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-7104de6fc4cb48558f4adc3bae243866
institution Kabale University
issn 2234-943X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj-art-7104de6fc4cb48558f4adc3bae2438662025-01-27T06:40:13ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2025-01-011410.3389/fonc.2024.15212531521253Mass resection as a candidate treatment for uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential: a case report and literature reviewHaijuan Shi0Yan Yin1Shoujun Liang2Chuanzhong Liu3Yibao Huang4Bingfeng Lu5Liying Zhang6Department of Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, ChinaBackgroundPerivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas) occurring in the uterus are rare, with surgery being the most recommended primary treatment for malignant cases. This study aims to provide clinical guidance on the clinicopathological features and appropriate treatment options for patients with uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential.CasesThis case series summarises the clinical courses of 13 patients diagnosed with uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential, including clinical and pathological data as well as their outcomes. We identified one case at our hospital, and data for the other 12 cases were extracted from the PubMed database. The 13 patients were aged 9–75 years, with tumour sizes ranging from 1 to 21 cm, and follow-up times ranging from 2 to 71 months. The most common signs and symptoms included abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and abdominal pain. Most of the patients (11/13) were managed surgically without any chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Except for the patients who were lost to follow-up, 11 patients were free of any recurrence or metastasis at their last follow-up. Patients with group A tumours (abundant HMB45 expression) had a longer disease-free survival than those with group B tumours.ConclusionsSurgery alone may be appropriate for uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential. Surgical treatment plans should consider the patient’s age, fertility requirements, and personal preferences. Mass resection is a viable treatment option for fertility preservation in reproductive-age patients.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1521253/fulluterine PEComasperivascular epithelioid celluncertain malignant potentialfertility preservationcase report
spellingShingle Haijuan Shi
Yan Yin
Shoujun Liang
Chuanzhong Liu
Yibao Huang
Bingfeng Lu
Liying Zhang
Mass resection as a candidate treatment for uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential: a case report and literature review
Frontiers in Oncology
uterine PEComas
perivascular epithelioid cell
uncertain malignant potential
fertility preservation
case report
title Mass resection as a candidate treatment for uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential: a case report and literature review
title_full Mass resection as a candidate treatment for uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential: a case report and literature review
title_fullStr Mass resection as a candidate treatment for uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential: a case report and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Mass resection as a candidate treatment for uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential: a case report and literature review
title_short Mass resection as a candidate treatment for uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential: a case report and literature review
title_sort mass resection as a candidate treatment for uterine pecomas of uncertain malignant potential a case report and literature review
topic uterine PEComas
perivascular epithelioid cell
uncertain malignant potential
fertility preservation
case report
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1521253/full
work_keys_str_mv AT haijuanshi massresectionasacandidatetreatmentforuterinepecomasofuncertainmalignantpotentialacasereportandliteraturereview
AT yanyin massresectionasacandidatetreatmentforuterinepecomasofuncertainmalignantpotentialacasereportandliteraturereview
AT shoujunliang massresectionasacandidatetreatmentforuterinepecomasofuncertainmalignantpotentialacasereportandliteraturereview
AT chuanzhongliu massresectionasacandidatetreatmentforuterinepecomasofuncertainmalignantpotentialacasereportandliteraturereview
AT yibaohuang massresectionasacandidatetreatmentforuterinepecomasofuncertainmalignantpotentialacasereportandliteraturereview
AT bingfenglu massresectionasacandidatetreatmentforuterinepecomasofuncertainmalignantpotentialacasereportandliteraturereview
AT liyingzhang massresectionasacandidatetreatmentforuterinepecomasofuncertainmalignantpotentialacasereportandliteraturereview