A Comparative Evaluation of the Radiopacity of Contemporary Restorative CAD/CAM Blocks Using Digital Radiography Based on the Impact of Material Composition

Purpose. The main purpose of this study was to assess the radiopacity of contemporary restorative computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) materials and the impact of material composition as measured by energy-dispersive X-ray spectrophotometry (EDX) on radiopacity. Materials a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nahla Gamal Elhelbawy, Rehab F Ghouraba, Fatma A Hasaneen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:International Journal of Biomaterials
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4131176
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550424593301504
author Nahla Gamal Elhelbawy
Rehab F Ghouraba
Fatma A Hasaneen
author_facet Nahla Gamal Elhelbawy
Rehab F Ghouraba
Fatma A Hasaneen
author_sort Nahla Gamal Elhelbawy
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. The main purpose of this study was to assess the radiopacity of contemporary restorative computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) materials and the impact of material composition as measured by energy-dispersive X-ray spectrophotometry (EDX) on radiopacity. Materials and Methods. Ten specimens of six CAD/CAM materials with 1 mm thickness were produced and then digitally radiographed with an aluminum (Al) step-wedge (SW) and 1 mm thick tooth slice. The specimen mean gray values (MGVs) were recorded in pixels and compared to an Al-SW, dentin, and enamel of equal thickness. For the elementary analysis of the composition of the materials, EDX was performed. Results. The recorded MGVs ranged between 21.20 ± 4.94 and 238.5 ± 13.61 pixels. Materials were sorted according to the MGVs descendingly, Prettau, Vita Suprinity, Vita Enamic, Shofu, Pekkton, and BioHPP. Prettau and Vita Suprinity had significantly higher MGV than dentin and 1 mm thick Al. In comparison, Vita Enamic had a slightly higher value than dentin and 1 mm thick Al. Although Pekkton and BioHPP had MGV significantly lower than dentin and 1 mm thick Al, Shofu had a significantly lower value than dentin and nonsignificantly lower than 1 mm thick Al (p < 0.05). According to EDX analysis, the examined materials contained several components in varying quantities of radiopacity. Conclusions. The radiopacity of only three studied materials exceeded the International Organization for Standardization’s minimum standards (ISO).
format Article
id doaj-art-70846146c3934ca8a9f4ea2afd7cb595
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8795
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Biomaterials
spelling doaj-art-70846146c3934ca8a9f4ea2afd7cb5952025-02-03T06:06:48ZengWileyInternational Journal of Biomaterials1687-87952022-01-01202210.1155/2022/4131176A Comparative Evaluation of the Radiopacity of Contemporary Restorative CAD/CAM Blocks Using Digital Radiography Based on the Impact of Material CompositionNahla Gamal Elhelbawy0Rehab F Ghouraba1Fatma A Hasaneen2Dental Biomaterials DepartmentOral MedicineFixed Prosthodontics DepartmentPurpose. The main purpose of this study was to assess the radiopacity of contemporary restorative computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) materials and the impact of material composition as measured by energy-dispersive X-ray spectrophotometry (EDX) on radiopacity. Materials and Methods. Ten specimens of six CAD/CAM materials with 1 mm thickness were produced and then digitally radiographed with an aluminum (Al) step-wedge (SW) and 1 mm thick tooth slice. The specimen mean gray values (MGVs) were recorded in pixels and compared to an Al-SW, dentin, and enamel of equal thickness. For the elementary analysis of the composition of the materials, EDX was performed. Results. The recorded MGVs ranged between 21.20 ± 4.94 and 238.5 ± 13.61 pixels. Materials were sorted according to the MGVs descendingly, Prettau, Vita Suprinity, Vita Enamic, Shofu, Pekkton, and BioHPP. Prettau and Vita Suprinity had significantly higher MGV than dentin and 1 mm thick Al. In comparison, Vita Enamic had a slightly higher value than dentin and 1 mm thick Al. Although Pekkton and BioHPP had MGV significantly lower than dentin and 1 mm thick Al, Shofu had a significantly lower value than dentin and nonsignificantly lower than 1 mm thick Al (p < 0.05). According to EDX analysis, the examined materials contained several components in varying quantities of radiopacity. Conclusions. The radiopacity of only three studied materials exceeded the International Organization for Standardization’s minimum standards (ISO).http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4131176
spellingShingle Nahla Gamal Elhelbawy
Rehab F Ghouraba
Fatma A Hasaneen
A Comparative Evaluation of the Radiopacity of Contemporary Restorative CAD/CAM Blocks Using Digital Radiography Based on the Impact of Material Composition
International Journal of Biomaterials
title A Comparative Evaluation of the Radiopacity of Contemporary Restorative CAD/CAM Blocks Using Digital Radiography Based on the Impact of Material Composition
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of the Radiopacity of Contemporary Restorative CAD/CAM Blocks Using Digital Radiography Based on the Impact of Material Composition
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of the Radiopacity of Contemporary Restorative CAD/CAM Blocks Using Digital Radiography Based on the Impact of Material Composition
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of the Radiopacity of Contemporary Restorative CAD/CAM Blocks Using Digital Radiography Based on the Impact of Material Composition
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of the Radiopacity of Contemporary Restorative CAD/CAM Blocks Using Digital Radiography Based on the Impact of Material Composition
title_sort comparative evaluation of the radiopacity of contemporary restorative cad cam blocks using digital radiography based on the impact of material composition
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4131176
work_keys_str_mv AT nahlagamalelhelbawy acomparativeevaluationoftheradiopacityofcontemporaryrestorativecadcamblocksusingdigitalradiographybasedontheimpactofmaterialcomposition
AT rehabfghouraba acomparativeevaluationoftheradiopacityofcontemporaryrestorativecadcamblocksusingdigitalradiographybasedontheimpactofmaterialcomposition
AT fatmaahasaneen acomparativeevaluationoftheradiopacityofcontemporaryrestorativecadcamblocksusingdigitalradiographybasedontheimpactofmaterialcomposition
AT nahlagamalelhelbawy comparativeevaluationoftheradiopacityofcontemporaryrestorativecadcamblocksusingdigitalradiographybasedontheimpactofmaterialcomposition
AT rehabfghouraba comparativeevaluationoftheradiopacityofcontemporaryrestorativecadcamblocksusingdigitalradiographybasedontheimpactofmaterialcomposition
AT fatmaahasaneen comparativeevaluationoftheradiopacityofcontemporaryrestorativecadcamblocksusingdigitalradiographybasedontheimpactofmaterialcomposition