Behind the lenses: Biases in the contribution of wildlife photography to biodiversity representation

Abstract Nature‐related visual media has a significant impact on today's society by engaging the public in conservation problems and promoting pro‐environmental behaviours. Although major attention has been paid to how some types of visual media (e.g. documentaries) offer unrealistic portrayals...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Héctor Ruiz‐Villar, Ana Morales‐González, Jon Morant
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-02-01
Series:People and Nature
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10789
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832087376738910208
author Héctor Ruiz‐Villar
Ana Morales‐González
Jon Morant
author_facet Héctor Ruiz‐Villar
Ana Morales‐González
Jon Morant
author_sort Héctor Ruiz‐Villar
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Nature‐related visual media has a significant impact on today's society by engaging the public in conservation problems and promoting pro‐environmental behaviours. Although major attention has been paid to how some types of visual media (e.g. documentaries) offer unrealistic portrayals of the natural world, biases on representation by wildlife photography remain unexplored. In the present study, we assessed biases in wildlife photography at spatial, temporal, taxonomic, conservation status and selection criteria scales, and modelled the factors influencing the probability of portrayed organisms winning a wildlife photography contest by using data on 1333 pictures featured in the Wildlife Photographer of the Year, one of the most popular wildlife photography competitions worldwide. The representation of biomes mostly coincides with their extension on the planet. However, we detected an overrepresentation of temperate (broadleaf and conifer), Mediterranean and tropical forests. We detected a positive change over time in representing historically neglected taxa, such as insects. We also detected an increase in representation of Mangroves, Marine Ecosystems, Tundra and temperate forests and grasslands. Mammals and birds were overrepresented in photographs while insects and plants were underrepresented, and so were species listed as ‘Least Concern’ and ‘Data Deficiency’. The top 10 ranking species included charismatic carnivore species. Our results showed that the jury's choice offered a more diverse representation of biodiversity than the people's choice, and the winning photographs showcased fewer taxonomic groups than the non‐winning pictures. Realm, domain and colourfulness influenced the probability of an organism's picture being winner, but the variability explained by our model reflects that there are a large number of unexplored determinants (e.g. socio‐economical, technical or emotional). Our research detected a trend towards a more balanced representation of the natural world in wildlife photography, although biases are yet large, which may influence people's perception of the current status of species and habitats they encompass. Our results highlight a need to evenly represent species and ecosystems to increase public awareness, which requires providing data on species identity and conservation status to increase public knowledge. Finally, we underscore the need to report compliance with ethical guidelines when photographing wildlife. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
format Article
id doaj-art-6fe2340e5933420f8a2784a52e05f7b3
institution Kabale University
issn 2575-8314
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series People and Nature
spelling doaj-art-6fe2340e5933420f8a2784a52e05f7b32025-02-06T05:27:39ZengWileyPeople and Nature2575-83142025-02-017254155610.1002/pan3.10789Behind the lenses: Biases in the contribution of wildlife photography to biodiversity representationHéctor Ruiz‐Villar0Ana Morales‐González1Jon Morant2Area of Zoology, Department of Biodiversity and Environmental Management, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Sciences University of León León SpainDepartment of Conservation Biology Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD‐CSIC) Seville SpainDepartment of Ecology University of Alicante Alicante SpainAbstract Nature‐related visual media has a significant impact on today's society by engaging the public in conservation problems and promoting pro‐environmental behaviours. Although major attention has been paid to how some types of visual media (e.g. documentaries) offer unrealistic portrayals of the natural world, biases on representation by wildlife photography remain unexplored. In the present study, we assessed biases in wildlife photography at spatial, temporal, taxonomic, conservation status and selection criteria scales, and modelled the factors influencing the probability of portrayed organisms winning a wildlife photography contest by using data on 1333 pictures featured in the Wildlife Photographer of the Year, one of the most popular wildlife photography competitions worldwide. The representation of biomes mostly coincides with their extension on the planet. However, we detected an overrepresentation of temperate (broadleaf and conifer), Mediterranean and tropical forests. We detected a positive change over time in representing historically neglected taxa, such as insects. We also detected an increase in representation of Mangroves, Marine Ecosystems, Tundra and temperate forests and grasslands. Mammals and birds were overrepresented in photographs while insects and plants were underrepresented, and so were species listed as ‘Least Concern’ and ‘Data Deficiency’. The top 10 ranking species included charismatic carnivore species. Our results showed that the jury's choice offered a more diverse representation of biodiversity than the people's choice, and the winning photographs showcased fewer taxonomic groups than the non‐winning pictures. Realm, domain and colourfulness influenced the probability of an organism's picture being winner, but the variability explained by our model reflects that there are a large number of unexplored determinants (e.g. socio‐economical, technical or emotional). Our research detected a trend towards a more balanced representation of the natural world in wildlife photography, although biases are yet large, which may influence people's perception of the current status of species and habitats they encompass. Our results highlight a need to evenly represent species and ecosystems to increase public awareness, which requires providing data on species identity and conservation status to increase public knowledge. Finally, we underscore the need to report compliance with ethical guidelines when photographing wildlife. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10789awarenessimagerynature photographyperceptionpublicvisual media
spellingShingle Héctor Ruiz‐Villar
Ana Morales‐González
Jon Morant
Behind the lenses: Biases in the contribution of wildlife photography to biodiversity representation
People and Nature
awareness
imagery
nature photography
perception
public
visual media
title Behind the lenses: Biases in the contribution of wildlife photography to biodiversity representation
title_full Behind the lenses: Biases in the contribution of wildlife photography to biodiversity representation
title_fullStr Behind the lenses: Biases in the contribution of wildlife photography to biodiversity representation
title_full_unstemmed Behind the lenses: Biases in the contribution of wildlife photography to biodiversity representation
title_short Behind the lenses: Biases in the contribution of wildlife photography to biodiversity representation
title_sort behind the lenses biases in the contribution of wildlife photography to biodiversity representation
topic awareness
imagery
nature photography
perception
public
visual media
url https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10789
work_keys_str_mv AT hectorruizvillar behindthelensesbiasesinthecontributionofwildlifephotographytobiodiversityrepresentation
AT anamoralesgonzalez behindthelensesbiasesinthecontributionofwildlifephotographytobiodiversityrepresentation
AT jonmorant behindthelensesbiasesinthecontributionofwildlifephotographytobiodiversityrepresentation