Rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviors
Abstract Keeping track of time intervals is a crucial aspect of behavior and cognition. Many theoretical models of how the brain times behavior make predictions for steady-state performance of well-learned intervals, but the rate of learning intervals in these models varies greatly, ranging from one...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Animal Cognition |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-025-01930-9 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832585571767156736 |
|---|---|
| author | N. Aggadi S. Krikawa T. A. Paine P. Simen C. D. Howard |
| author_facet | N. Aggadi S. Krikawa T. A. Paine P. Simen C. D. Howard |
| author_sort | N. Aggadi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Keeping track of time intervals is a crucial aspect of behavior and cognition. Many theoretical models of how the brain times behavior make predictions for steady-state performance of well-learned intervals, but the rate of learning intervals in these models varies greatly, ranging from one-shot learning to learning over thousands of trials. Here, we explored how quickly rats and mice adapt to changes in interval durations using a serial fixed-interval task. In the first experiment, animals experienced randomly selected fixed-intervals of 12, 24, 36, 48, or 60 s, for blocks ranging from 13 to 21 trials. Consistent with previous work, animals abruptly increased lever pressing as reward availability approached, and these ‘start times’ scaled with the interval duration for both species. We then quantified the rate of updating to new trial durations and found that rodents consistently updated their start times within 2–3 trials following a change in interval duration, before stabilizing their behavior by the third or fourth trial. To account for repeated exposures to fixed-interval durations, a second set of animals was tested with new fixed-intervals after being trained on the serial fixed-interval task described above. Next, a third group was trained on fixed-interval durations that were generated de novo in each day. In each of these contexts, rodents rapidly increased or decreased their start times to mirror new FI durations following exposure to 1–2 trials of new intervals following block transitions. This work adds to growing evidence for rapid duration learning across species, highlighting the need for timing models to be capable of rapid updating in dynamic temporal scenarios. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6fa1241c561e499b9b47153b9a706c6e |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1435-9456 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Animal Cognition |
| spelling | doaj-art-6fa1241c561e499b9b47153b9a706c6e2025-01-26T12:43:40ZengSpringerAnimal Cognition1435-94562025-01-0128111310.1007/s10071-025-01930-9Rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviorsN. Aggadi0S. Krikawa1T. A. Paine2P. Simen3C. D. Howard4Neuroscience Department, Oberlin CollegeNeuroscience Department, Oberlin CollegeNeuroscience Department, Oberlin CollegeNeuroscience Department, Oberlin CollegeNeuroscience Department, Oberlin CollegeAbstract Keeping track of time intervals is a crucial aspect of behavior and cognition. Many theoretical models of how the brain times behavior make predictions for steady-state performance of well-learned intervals, but the rate of learning intervals in these models varies greatly, ranging from one-shot learning to learning over thousands of trials. Here, we explored how quickly rats and mice adapt to changes in interval durations using a serial fixed-interval task. In the first experiment, animals experienced randomly selected fixed-intervals of 12, 24, 36, 48, or 60 s, for blocks ranging from 13 to 21 trials. Consistent with previous work, animals abruptly increased lever pressing as reward availability approached, and these ‘start times’ scaled with the interval duration for both species. We then quantified the rate of updating to new trial durations and found that rodents consistently updated their start times within 2–3 trials following a change in interval duration, before stabilizing their behavior by the third or fourth trial. To account for repeated exposures to fixed-interval durations, a second set of animals was tested with new fixed-intervals after being trained on the serial fixed-interval task described above. Next, a third group was trained on fixed-interval durations that were generated de novo in each day. In each of these contexts, rodents rapidly increased or decreased their start times to mirror new FI durations following exposure to 1–2 trials of new intervals following block transitions. This work adds to growing evidence for rapid duration learning across species, highlighting the need for timing models to be capable of rapid updating in dynamic temporal scenarios.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-025-01930-9Interval timingLearningDynamic timing |
| spellingShingle | N. Aggadi S. Krikawa T. A. Paine P. Simen C. D. Howard Rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviors Animal Cognition Interval timing Learning Dynamic timing |
| title | Rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviors |
| title_full | Rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviors |
| title_fullStr | Rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviors |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviors |
| title_short | Rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviors |
| title_sort | rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviors |
| topic | Interval timing Learning Dynamic timing |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-025-01930-9 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT naggadi ratsandmicerapidlyupdatetimedbehaviors AT skrikawa ratsandmicerapidlyupdatetimedbehaviors AT tapaine ratsandmicerapidlyupdatetimedbehaviors AT psimen ratsandmicerapidlyupdatetimedbehaviors AT cdhoward ratsandmicerapidlyupdatetimedbehaviors |