Internal Judicial Independence in the EU and Ghosts from the Socialist Past: Why the Court of Justice Should Not Follow AG Pikamäe in Hann-Invest
The editorial comment discusses the preliminary reference and the Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe in Joined Cases C-554/21, C-622/21 and C-727/21 Hann Invest, which is currently pending before the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice. In the preliminary reference – the first reference on the st...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/565 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The editorial comment discusses the preliminary reference and the Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe in Joined Cases C-554/21, C-622/21 and C-727/21 Hann Invest, which is currently pending before the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice. In the preliminary reference – the first reference on the state of the rule of law and independence of the judiciary in Croatia – the referring national court questioned whether the Croatian mechanism for ensuring consistency of case law of second-instance national courts and the Supreme Court complies with Article 19(1) TEU. Unlike the AG, this comment argues it does not. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1845-5662 1848-9958 |