A Randomized Survey of the Preference of Gastroenterologists for a Cochrane Review versus a Traditional Narrative Review
BACKGROUND: Clinicians often rely on review material rather than analysis of primary research to guide therapy. Systematic reviews use methods to insure thoroughness and to minimize bias, but many clinicians are not familiar with systematic reviews and continue to rely on narrative reviews.
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2002-01-01
|
Series: | Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2002/513758 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832550280773763072 |
---|---|
author | John WD McDonald Jeffrey Mahon Kelly Zarnke Brian Feagan Lorinda Simms Wayne Tucker |
author_facet | John WD McDonald Jeffrey Mahon Kelly Zarnke Brian Feagan Lorinda Simms Wayne Tucker |
author_sort | John WD McDonald |
collection | DOAJ |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinicians often rely on review material rather than analysis of primary research to guide therapy. Systematic reviews use methods to insure thoroughness and to minimize bias, but many clinicians are not familiar with systematic reviews and continue to rely on narrative reviews. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-6e62cd01ac5442e4bfb88289ca155192 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0835-7900 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology |
spelling | doaj-art-6e62cd01ac5442e4bfb88289ca1551922025-02-03T06:07:12ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology0835-79002002-01-01161172110.1155/2002/513758A Randomized Survey of the Preference of Gastroenterologists for a Cochrane Review versus a Traditional Narrative ReviewJohn WD McDonald0Jeffrey Mahon1Kelly Zarnke2Brian Feagan3Lorinda Simms4Wayne Tucker5University of Western Ontario and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, CanadaUniversity of Western Ontario and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, CanadaUniversity of Western Ontario and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, CanadaUniversity of Western Ontario and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, CanadaUniversity of Western Ontario and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, CanadaUniversity of Western Ontario and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, CanadaBACKGROUND: Clinicians often rely on review material rather than analysis of primary research to guide therapy. Systematic reviews use methods to insure thoroughness and to minimize bias, but many clinicians are not familiar with systematic reviews and continue to rely on narrative reviews.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2002/513758 |
spellingShingle | John WD McDonald Jeffrey Mahon Kelly Zarnke Brian Feagan Lorinda Simms Wayne Tucker A Randomized Survey of the Preference of Gastroenterologists for a Cochrane Review versus a Traditional Narrative Review Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology |
title | A Randomized Survey of the Preference of Gastroenterologists for a Cochrane Review versus a Traditional Narrative Review |
title_full | A Randomized Survey of the Preference of Gastroenterologists for a Cochrane Review versus a Traditional Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | A Randomized Survey of the Preference of Gastroenterologists for a Cochrane Review versus a Traditional Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized Survey of the Preference of Gastroenterologists for a Cochrane Review versus a Traditional Narrative Review |
title_short | A Randomized Survey of the Preference of Gastroenterologists for a Cochrane Review versus a Traditional Narrative Review |
title_sort | randomized survey of the preference of gastroenterologists for a cochrane review versus a traditional narrative review |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2002/513758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnwdmcdonald arandomizedsurveyofthepreferenceofgastroenterologistsforacochranereviewversusatraditionalnarrativereview AT jeffreymahon arandomizedsurveyofthepreferenceofgastroenterologistsforacochranereviewversusatraditionalnarrativereview AT kellyzarnke arandomizedsurveyofthepreferenceofgastroenterologistsforacochranereviewversusatraditionalnarrativereview AT brianfeagan arandomizedsurveyofthepreferenceofgastroenterologistsforacochranereviewversusatraditionalnarrativereview AT lorindasimms arandomizedsurveyofthepreferenceofgastroenterologistsforacochranereviewversusatraditionalnarrativereview AT waynetucker arandomizedsurveyofthepreferenceofgastroenterologistsforacochranereviewversusatraditionalnarrativereview AT johnwdmcdonald randomizedsurveyofthepreferenceofgastroenterologistsforacochranereviewversusatraditionalnarrativereview AT jeffreymahon randomizedsurveyofthepreferenceofgastroenterologistsforacochranereviewversusatraditionalnarrativereview AT kellyzarnke randomizedsurveyofthepreferenceofgastroenterologistsforacochranereviewversusatraditionalnarrativereview AT brianfeagan randomizedsurveyofthepreferenceofgastroenterologistsforacochranereviewversusatraditionalnarrativereview AT lorindasimms randomizedsurveyofthepreferenceofgastroenterologistsforacochranereviewversusatraditionalnarrativereview AT waynetucker randomizedsurveyofthepreferenceofgastroenterologistsforacochranereviewversusatraditionalnarrativereview |