EU Procedural Law Revisited: The Reformed EU Judicial Architecture between the Statute of the Court of Justice and the Rules of Procedure

(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2025 10(2), 293-326 | Article | (Table of Contents) 1. Introduction: scope and purposes of the analysis. – 2. The partial transfer of preliminary references from the Court to the General Court. – 2.1. The scope of the General C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lorenzo Grossio, Davor Petrić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) 2025-06-01
Series:European Papers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.europeanpapers.eu/e-journal/eu-procedural-law-revisited-reformed-eu-judicial-architecture-between-statute-court-justice-rules-procedure
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849316359582777344
author Lorenzo Grossio
Davor Petrić
author_facet Lorenzo Grossio
Davor Petrić
author_sort Lorenzo Grossio
collection DOAJ
description (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2025 10(2), 293-326 | Article | (Table of Contents) 1. Introduction: scope and purposes of the analysis. – 2. The partial transfer of preliminary references from the Court to the General Court. – 2.1. The scope of the General Court’s jurisdiction on preliminary references. – 2.2. The guichet unique mechanism. – 2.3. The procedure for hearing and determining preliminary references at the General Court. – 2.4. The revision of preliminary rulings issued by the General Court. – 3. The new rules on transparency and participation in preliminary reference proceedings. – 4. The extension of the scope of application of the filtering mechanism on appeal. – 5. Not a conclusion but… rather a way forward. | (Abstract) The article provides a critical assessment of the 2024 reform of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, combining the analysis of the amended provisions of Protocol No 3 and the Rules of Procedure of both the Court of Justice and General Court. To that aim, the contribution takes a procedural standpoint on the topic, with a view to paving the way to the various perspectives featured in the Special Section. Focusing on the transfer of jurisdiction on preliminary references, the article discusses the rationales behind the selection of ‘areas of law’ subject to devolution, thereby disclosing that the reform leaves a ‘variable geometry’ scope to the Court of Justice for being involved in cases in any domain of EU law. That part of the analysis is complemented by assessing the new filing and distributing mechanism for preliminary references (guichet unique), the revision mechanism for preliminary rulings issued by the General Court, and the latter’s new procedural framework for treating preliminary references. While the procedure has been designed in a way to mirror that already applied by the Court of Justice, the article argues that the General Court’s distinctive features may significantly impact the way in which it deals with preliminary references. The analysis then discusses the design and consequences of the new provisions on participation in preliminary references and publication of parties’ written submissions, as well as the rationales and impact of extending the scope of application of the prior admission on appeal mechanism.
format Article
id doaj-art-6e60f1b0ae9b47f7b3b0ffcfc5609b1b
institution Kabale University
issn 2499-8249
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
record_format Article
series European Papers
spelling doaj-art-6e60f1b0ae9b47f7b3b0ffcfc5609b1b2025-08-20T03:51:48ZengEuropean Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)European Papers2499-82492025-06-012025 10229332610.15166/2499-8249/834EU Procedural Law Revisited: The Reformed EU Judicial Architecture between the Statute of the Court of Justice and the Rules of ProcedureLorenzo Grossio0Davor Petrić1University of TurinUniversity of Zagreb(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2025 10(2), 293-326 | Article | (Table of Contents) 1. Introduction: scope and purposes of the analysis. – 2. The partial transfer of preliminary references from the Court to the General Court. – 2.1. The scope of the General Court’s jurisdiction on preliminary references. – 2.2. The guichet unique mechanism. – 2.3. The procedure for hearing and determining preliminary references at the General Court. – 2.4. The revision of preliminary rulings issued by the General Court. – 3. The new rules on transparency and participation in preliminary reference proceedings. – 4. The extension of the scope of application of the filtering mechanism on appeal. – 5. Not a conclusion but… rather a way forward. | (Abstract) The article provides a critical assessment of the 2024 reform of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, combining the analysis of the amended provisions of Protocol No 3 and the Rules of Procedure of both the Court of Justice and General Court. To that aim, the contribution takes a procedural standpoint on the topic, with a view to paving the way to the various perspectives featured in the Special Section. Focusing on the transfer of jurisdiction on preliminary references, the article discusses the rationales behind the selection of ‘areas of law’ subject to devolution, thereby disclosing that the reform leaves a ‘variable geometry’ scope to the Court of Justice for being involved in cases in any domain of EU law. That part of the analysis is complemented by assessing the new filing and distributing mechanism for preliminary references (guichet unique), the revision mechanism for preliminary rulings issued by the General Court, and the latter’s new procedural framework for treating preliminary references. While the procedure has been designed in a way to mirror that already applied by the Court of Justice, the article argues that the General Court’s distinctive features may significantly impact the way in which it deals with preliminary references. The analysis then discusses the design and consequences of the new provisions on participation in preliminary references and publication of parties’ written submissions, as well as the rationales and impact of extending the scope of application of the prior admission on appeal mechanism.https://www.europeanpapers.eu/e-journal/eu-procedural-law-revisited-reformed-eu-judicial-architecture-between-statute-court-justice-rules-procedurecourt of justicestatute of the court of justicerules of proceduretransfer of preliminary referencestransparencyprior admission on appeal
spellingShingle Lorenzo Grossio
Davor Petrić
EU Procedural Law Revisited: The Reformed EU Judicial Architecture between the Statute of the Court of Justice and the Rules of Procedure
European Papers
court of justice
statute of the court of justice
rules of procedure
transfer of preliminary references
transparency
prior admission on appeal
title EU Procedural Law Revisited: The Reformed EU Judicial Architecture between the Statute of the Court of Justice and the Rules of Procedure
title_full EU Procedural Law Revisited: The Reformed EU Judicial Architecture between the Statute of the Court of Justice and the Rules of Procedure
title_fullStr EU Procedural Law Revisited: The Reformed EU Judicial Architecture between the Statute of the Court of Justice and the Rules of Procedure
title_full_unstemmed EU Procedural Law Revisited: The Reformed EU Judicial Architecture between the Statute of the Court of Justice and the Rules of Procedure
title_short EU Procedural Law Revisited: The Reformed EU Judicial Architecture between the Statute of the Court of Justice and the Rules of Procedure
title_sort eu procedural law revisited the reformed eu judicial architecture between the statute of the court of justice and the rules of procedure
topic court of justice
statute of the court of justice
rules of procedure
transfer of preliminary references
transparency
prior admission on appeal
url https://www.europeanpapers.eu/e-journal/eu-procedural-law-revisited-reformed-eu-judicial-architecture-between-statute-court-justice-rules-procedure
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzogrossio euprocedurallawrevisitedthereformedeujudicialarchitecturebetweenthestatuteofthecourtofjusticeandtherulesofprocedure
AT davorpetric euprocedurallawrevisitedthereformedeujudicialarchitecturebetweenthestatuteofthecourtofjusticeandtherulesofprocedure