Land subsidence and rebound response to groundwater recovery in the Beijing Plain: A new hydrological perspective

Study region: Beijing Plain (BJP), China. Study focus: The rapid land subsidence in BJP has been alleviated since the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. Groundwater level (GWL) is recovering with more precipitation from climate change. The land deformation pattern is evolving into a coexistence...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dexin Meng, Beibei Chen, Huili Gong, Shubo Zhang, Rui Ma, Chaofan Zhou, Kunchao Lei, Lewei Xu, Xincheng Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581824004762
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591774194860032
author Dexin Meng
Beibei Chen
Huili Gong
Shubo Zhang
Rui Ma
Chaofan Zhou
Kunchao Lei
Lewei Xu
Xincheng Wang
author_facet Dexin Meng
Beibei Chen
Huili Gong
Shubo Zhang
Rui Ma
Chaofan Zhou
Kunchao Lei
Lewei Xu
Xincheng Wang
author_sort Dexin Meng
collection DOAJ
description Study region: Beijing Plain (BJP), China. Study focus: The rapid land subsidence in BJP has been alleviated since the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. Groundwater level (GWL) is recovering with more precipitation from climate change. The land deformation pattern is evolving into a coexistence of subsidence-rebound. Hence, Sentinel-1A and InSAR were used to investigate surface deformation in 2016–2022, and a new Transfer Function Analysis (TFA) framework was proposed by integrating deformation, precipitation, wells, and hydrogeological data. This study quantified the response characteristics among precipitation, GWL, and deformation according to TFA, aiming to explore the differential response mechanisms of subsidence-rebound to GWL affected by monsoon precipitation. The maximum rebound was estimated. New hydrological insights for the region: Compared to 2011–2015, the area with a subsidence rate of over 60 mm/yr in 2016–2022 has decreased by 37 %. Local areas have experienced a rebound, the area with a rebound rate of over 5 mm/yr is 67.2 km2. The seasonal response between precipitation and GWL exists throughout the plain, while the seasonal response between GWL and deformation is only consistent in the northwest. The aquifer schematic models suggest that the differential deformation response is related to lithology and residual deformation. In the southeast, the aquifer head is still below the adjacent aquitard head, with a larger residual deformation disturbing the seasonal response caused by precipitation. A longer delay between GWL recovery and surface rebound was observed in the aquifer with thicker clay layers, with over 77 % of the compaction being irreversible.
format Article
id doaj-art-6e0b4f1d278f4456a9b21a9119e855bc
institution Kabale University
issn 2214-5818
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
spelling doaj-art-6e0b4f1d278f4456a9b21a9119e855bc2025-01-22T05:42:08ZengElsevierJournal of Hydrology: Regional Studies2214-58182025-02-0157102127Land subsidence and rebound response to groundwater recovery in the Beijing Plain: A new hydrological perspectiveDexin Meng0Beibei Chen1Huili Gong2Shubo Zhang3Rui Ma4Chaofan Zhou5Kunchao Lei6Lewei Xu7Xincheng Wang8College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education Land Subsidence Mechanism and Prevention, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, ChinaCollege of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education Land Subsidence Mechanism and Prevention, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Correspondence to: No. 105, North Road, the west 3rd ring road, Beijing, China.College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education Land Subsidence Mechanism and Prevention, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, ChinaCollege of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education Land Subsidence Mechanism and Prevention, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, ChinaHubei Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Basin Environmental Aquatic Science, School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, ChinaCollege of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education Land Subsidence Mechanism and Prevention, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, ChinaBeijing Institute of Geo-Environment Monitoring, Beijing 100195, ChinaCollege of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education Land Subsidence Mechanism and Prevention, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, ChinaCollege of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education Land Subsidence Mechanism and Prevention, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, ChinaStudy region: Beijing Plain (BJP), China. Study focus: The rapid land subsidence in BJP has been alleviated since the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. Groundwater level (GWL) is recovering with more precipitation from climate change. The land deformation pattern is evolving into a coexistence of subsidence-rebound. Hence, Sentinel-1A and InSAR were used to investigate surface deformation in 2016–2022, and a new Transfer Function Analysis (TFA) framework was proposed by integrating deformation, precipitation, wells, and hydrogeological data. This study quantified the response characteristics among precipitation, GWL, and deformation according to TFA, aiming to explore the differential response mechanisms of subsidence-rebound to GWL affected by monsoon precipitation. The maximum rebound was estimated. New hydrological insights for the region: Compared to 2011–2015, the area with a subsidence rate of over 60 mm/yr in 2016–2022 has decreased by 37 %. Local areas have experienced a rebound, the area with a rebound rate of over 5 mm/yr is 67.2 km2. The seasonal response between precipitation and GWL exists throughout the plain, while the seasonal response between GWL and deformation is only consistent in the northwest. The aquifer schematic models suggest that the differential deformation response is related to lithology and residual deformation. In the southeast, the aquifer head is still below the adjacent aquitard head, with a larger residual deformation disturbing the seasonal response caused by precipitation. A longer delay between GWL recovery and surface rebound was observed in the aquifer with thicker clay layers, with over 77 % of the compaction being irreversible.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581824004762Land subsidence and reboundInSARGroundwater level recoverySouth-to-North Water Diversion ProjectClimate change
spellingShingle Dexin Meng
Beibei Chen
Huili Gong
Shubo Zhang
Rui Ma
Chaofan Zhou
Kunchao Lei
Lewei Xu
Xincheng Wang
Land subsidence and rebound response to groundwater recovery in the Beijing Plain: A new hydrological perspective
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
Land subsidence and rebound
InSAR
Groundwater level recovery
South-to-North Water Diversion Project
Climate change
title Land subsidence and rebound response to groundwater recovery in the Beijing Plain: A new hydrological perspective
title_full Land subsidence and rebound response to groundwater recovery in the Beijing Plain: A new hydrological perspective
title_fullStr Land subsidence and rebound response to groundwater recovery in the Beijing Plain: A new hydrological perspective
title_full_unstemmed Land subsidence and rebound response to groundwater recovery in the Beijing Plain: A new hydrological perspective
title_short Land subsidence and rebound response to groundwater recovery in the Beijing Plain: A new hydrological perspective
title_sort land subsidence and rebound response to groundwater recovery in the beijing plain a new hydrological perspective
topic Land subsidence and rebound
InSAR
Groundwater level recovery
South-to-North Water Diversion Project
Climate change
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581824004762
work_keys_str_mv AT dexinmeng landsubsidenceandreboundresponsetogroundwaterrecoveryinthebeijingplainanewhydrologicalperspective
AT beibeichen landsubsidenceandreboundresponsetogroundwaterrecoveryinthebeijingplainanewhydrologicalperspective
AT huiligong landsubsidenceandreboundresponsetogroundwaterrecoveryinthebeijingplainanewhydrologicalperspective
AT shubozhang landsubsidenceandreboundresponsetogroundwaterrecoveryinthebeijingplainanewhydrologicalperspective
AT ruima landsubsidenceandreboundresponsetogroundwaterrecoveryinthebeijingplainanewhydrologicalperspective
AT chaofanzhou landsubsidenceandreboundresponsetogroundwaterrecoveryinthebeijingplainanewhydrologicalperspective
AT kunchaolei landsubsidenceandreboundresponsetogroundwaterrecoveryinthebeijingplainanewhydrologicalperspective
AT leweixu landsubsidenceandreboundresponsetogroundwaterrecoveryinthebeijingplainanewhydrologicalperspective
AT xinchengwang landsubsidenceandreboundresponsetogroundwaterrecoveryinthebeijingplainanewhydrologicalperspective