Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation

Background. Stroke frequently leaves survivors with hemiparesis. To prevent persistent deficits, rehabilitation may be more effective if started early. Early training is often limited because of orthostatic reactions. Tilt-table stepping robots and functional electrical stimulation (FES) may prevent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexey N. Kuznetsov, Natalia V. Rybalko, Vadim D. Daminov, Andreas R. Luft
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:Stroke Research and Treatment
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/946056
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560950207578112
author Alexey N. Kuznetsov
Natalia V. Rybalko
Vadim D. Daminov
Andreas R. Luft
author_facet Alexey N. Kuznetsov
Natalia V. Rybalko
Vadim D. Daminov
Andreas R. Luft
author_sort Alexey N. Kuznetsov
collection DOAJ
description Background. Stroke frequently leaves survivors with hemiparesis. To prevent persistent deficits, rehabilitation may be more effective if started early. Early training is often limited because of orthostatic reactions. Tilt-table stepping robots and functional electrical stimulation (FES) may prevent these reactions. Objective. This controlled convenience sample study compares safety and feasibility of robotic tilt-table training plus FES (ROBO-FES) and robotic tilt-table training (ROBO) against tilt-table training alone (control). A preliminary assessment of efficacy is performed. Methods. Hemiparetic ischemic stroke survivors (age years, days after stroke) were assigned to 30 days of ROBO-FES (), ROBO (), or control () in addition to conventional physical therapy. Impedance cardiography and transcranial doppler sonography were performed before, during, and after training. Hemiparesis was assessed using the British Medical Research Council (MRC) strength scale. Results. No serious adverse events occurred; 8 patients in the tilt-table group prematurely quit the study because of orthostatic reactions. Blood pressure and CBFV dipped % during robot training. In 52% of controls mean arterial pressure decreased by %. ROBO-FES increased leg strength by points, ROBO by more than control (, ). CBFV increased in both robotic groups more than in controls (). Conclusions. Robotic tilt-table exercise with or without FES is safe and may be more effective in improving leg strength and cerebral blood flow than tilt table alone.
format Article
id doaj-art-6d2410a963394084b28a4992743785b4
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8105
2042-0056
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Stroke Research and Treatment
spelling doaj-art-6d2410a963394084b28a4992743785b42025-02-03T01:26:23ZengWileyStroke Research and Treatment2090-81052042-00562013-01-01201310.1155/2013/946056946056Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical StimulationAlexey N. Kuznetsov0Natalia V. Rybalko1Vadim D. Daminov2Andreas R. Luft3Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, National Pirogov Centre of Therapy and Surgery, Nignaya Pervomaiskaya Street 70, Moscow 105203, RussiaDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, National Pirogov Centre of Therapy and Surgery, Nignaya Pervomaiskaya Street 70, Moscow 105203, RussiaDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, National Pirogov Centre of Therapy and Surgery, Nignaya Pervomaiskaya Street 70, Moscow 105203, RussiaClinical Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neurology, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, SwitzerlandBackground. Stroke frequently leaves survivors with hemiparesis. To prevent persistent deficits, rehabilitation may be more effective if started early. Early training is often limited because of orthostatic reactions. Tilt-table stepping robots and functional electrical stimulation (FES) may prevent these reactions. Objective. This controlled convenience sample study compares safety and feasibility of robotic tilt-table training plus FES (ROBO-FES) and robotic tilt-table training (ROBO) against tilt-table training alone (control). A preliminary assessment of efficacy is performed. Methods. Hemiparetic ischemic stroke survivors (age years, days after stroke) were assigned to 30 days of ROBO-FES (), ROBO (), or control () in addition to conventional physical therapy. Impedance cardiography and transcranial doppler sonography were performed before, during, and after training. Hemiparesis was assessed using the British Medical Research Council (MRC) strength scale. Results. No serious adverse events occurred; 8 patients in the tilt-table group prematurely quit the study because of orthostatic reactions. Blood pressure and CBFV dipped % during robot training. In 52% of controls mean arterial pressure decreased by %. ROBO-FES increased leg strength by points, ROBO by more than control (, ). CBFV increased in both robotic groups more than in controls (). Conclusions. Robotic tilt-table exercise with or without FES is safe and may be more effective in improving leg strength and cerebral blood flow than tilt table alone.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/946056
spellingShingle Alexey N. Kuznetsov
Natalia V. Rybalko
Vadim D. Daminov
Andreas R. Luft
Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation
Stroke Research and Treatment
title Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation
title_full Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation
title_fullStr Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation
title_short Early Poststroke Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Tilt-Table Stepper and Functional Electrical Stimulation
title_sort early poststroke rehabilitation using a robotic tilt table stepper and functional electrical stimulation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/946056
work_keys_str_mv AT alexeynkuznetsov earlypoststrokerehabilitationusingarobotictilttablestepperandfunctionalelectricalstimulation
AT nataliavrybalko earlypoststrokerehabilitationusingarobotictilttablestepperandfunctionalelectricalstimulation
AT vadimddaminov earlypoststrokerehabilitationusingarobotictilttablestepperandfunctionalelectricalstimulation
AT andreasrluft earlypoststrokerehabilitationusingarobotictilttablestepperandfunctionalelectricalstimulation