Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution

Objective. We compared the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (MIPS) as a frontline treatment for spontaneous supratentorial ICH to medical management. Patients. The sample consisted of 17 patients who underwent MIPS from January 2014 to December 2016 and a compari...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victoria L. Phillips, Anil K. Roy, Jonathan Ratcliff, Gustavo Pradilla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Stroke Research and Treatment
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6503038
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566483961511936
author Victoria L. Phillips
Anil K. Roy
Jonathan Ratcliff
Gustavo Pradilla
author_facet Victoria L. Phillips
Anil K. Roy
Jonathan Ratcliff
Gustavo Pradilla
author_sort Victoria L. Phillips
collection DOAJ
description Objective. We compared the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (MIPS) as a frontline treatment for spontaneous supratentorial ICH to medical management. Patients. The sample consisted of 17 patients who underwent MIPS from January 2014 to December 2016 and a comparison group of 23 patients who were medically managed from June 2012 to December 2013. All had an International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis of 431 and were treated at Grady Memorial Hospital, an urban, public, safety-net hospital. Methods. The primary endpoint was risk of inpatient mortality. Secondary endpoints were rates of inpatient infection and favorable discharge status, defined as discharge to home or rehabilitation facility. Demographics and pre- and postclinical outcomes were compared using t-tests, the Mann–Whitney test, and chi-squared tests for continuous, ordinal and categorical measures, respectively. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the time to inpatient death. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine treatment effects on secondary outcomes. We also conducted exploratory subgroup analyses which compared MIPS to two medical management subgroups: those who had surgery during their hospitalization and those that did not. Results. Two patients (12%) died in the MIPS group compared to three (12%) in the medical management group. MIPS did not increase the risk of inpatient mortality relative to medical management. Rates of inpatient infection did not differ significantly between the two groups; eight MIPS patients (47%) and 13 medically managed patients (50%) contracted infections. MIPS significantly increased the likelihood of favorable discharge status (odds ratio (OR) 1.77; 95% CI, 1.12–21.9) compared to medical management. No outcome measures were significantly different between MIPS and the medical management subgroup without surgery, while rates of favorable discharge were higher among the MIPS patients compared to the medical management group with surgery. Conclusions. These data suggest that MIPS, as a frontline treatment for spontaneous ICH, versus medical management for spontaneous ICH warrants further investigation.
format Article
id doaj-art-6c1a3c1e9a064a338c05f62018a7f9bb
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8105
2042-0056
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Stroke Research and Treatment
spelling doaj-art-6c1a3c1e9a064a338c05f62018a7f9bb2025-02-03T01:03:59ZengWileyStroke Research and Treatment2090-81052042-00562020-01-01202010.1155/2020/65030386503038Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single InstitutionVictoria L. Phillips0Anil K. Roy1Jonathan Ratcliff2Gustavo Pradilla3Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USADepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365 Clifton Road NE, Building B, Suite 2200, Atlanta, GA 30322, USADepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365 Clifton Road NE, Building B, Suite 2200, Atlanta, GA 30322, USADepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365 Clifton Road NE, Building B, Suite 2200, Atlanta, GA 30322, USAObjective. We compared the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (MIPS) as a frontline treatment for spontaneous supratentorial ICH to medical management. Patients. The sample consisted of 17 patients who underwent MIPS from January 2014 to December 2016 and a comparison group of 23 patients who were medically managed from June 2012 to December 2013. All had an International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis of 431 and were treated at Grady Memorial Hospital, an urban, public, safety-net hospital. Methods. The primary endpoint was risk of inpatient mortality. Secondary endpoints were rates of inpatient infection and favorable discharge status, defined as discharge to home or rehabilitation facility. Demographics and pre- and postclinical outcomes were compared using t-tests, the Mann–Whitney test, and chi-squared tests for continuous, ordinal and categorical measures, respectively. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the time to inpatient death. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine treatment effects on secondary outcomes. We also conducted exploratory subgroup analyses which compared MIPS to two medical management subgroups: those who had surgery during their hospitalization and those that did not. Results. Two patients (12%) died in the MIPS group compared to three (12%) in the medical management group. MIPS did not increase the risk of inpatient mortality relative to medical management. Rates of inpatient infection did not differ significantly between the two groups; eight MIPS patients (47%) and 13 medically managed patients (50%) contracted infections. MIPS significantly increased the likelihood of favorable discharge status (odds ratio (OR) 1.77; 95% CI, 1.12–21.9) compared to medical management. No outcome measures were significantly different between MIPS and the medical management subgroup without surgery, while rates of favorable discharge were higher among the MIPS patients compared to the medical management group with surgery. Conclusions. These data suggest that MIPS, as a frontline treatment for spontaneous ICH, versus medical management for spontaneous ICH warrants further investigation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6503038
spellingShingle Victoria L. Phillips
Anil K. Roy
Jonathan Ratcliff
Gustavo Pradilla
Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution
Stroke Research and Treatment
title Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution
title_full Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution
title_short Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution
title_sort minimally invasive parafascicular surgery mips for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage compared to medical management a case series comparison for a single institution
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6503038
work_keys_str_mv AT victorialphillips minimallyinvasiveparafascicularsurgerymipsforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhagecomparedtomedicalmanagementacaseseriescomparisonforasingleinstitution
AT anilkroy minimallyinvasiveparafascicularsurgerymipsforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhagecomparedtomedicalmanagementacaseseriescomparisonforasingleinstitution
AT jonathanratcliff minimallyinvasiveparafascicularsurgerymipsforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhagecomparedtomedicalmanagementacaseseriescomparisonforasingleinstitution
AT gustavopradilla minimallyinvasiveparafascicularsurgerymipsforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhagecomparedtomedicalmanagementacaseseriescomparisonforasingleinstitution