A Semi-Automated Usability Evaluation Framework for Interactive Image Segmentation Systems

For complex segmentation tasks, the achievable accuracy of fully automated systems is inherently limited. Specifically, when a precise segmentation result is desired for a small amount of given data sets, semi-automatic methods exhibit a clear benefit for the user. The optimization of human computer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mario Amrehn, Stefan Steidl, Reinier Kortekaas, Maddalena Strumia, Markus Weingarten, Markus Kowarschik, Andreas Maier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1464592
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548767379750912
author Mario Amrehn
Stefan Steidl
Reinier Kortekaas
Maddalena Strumia
Markus Weingarten
Markus Kowarschik
Andreas Maier
author_facet Mario Amrehn
Stefan Steidl
Reinier Kortekaas
Maddalena Strumia
Markus Weingarten
Markus Kowarschik
Andreas Maier
author_sort Mario Amrehn
collection DOAJ
description For complex segmentation tasks, the achievable accuracy of fully automated systems is inherently limited. Specifically, when a precise segmentation result is desired for a small amount of given data sets, semi-automatic methods exhibit a clear benefit for the user. The optimization of human computer interaction (HCI) is an essential part of interactive image segmentation. Nevertheless, publications introducing novel interactive segmentation systems (ISS) often lack an objective comparison of HCI aspects. It is demonstrated that even when the underlying segmentation algorithm is the same throughout interactive prototypes, their user experience may vary substantially. As a result, users prefer simple interfaces as well as a considerable degree of freedom to control each iterative step of the segmentation. In this article, an objective method for the comparison of ISS is proposed, based on extensive user studies. A summative qualitative content analysis is conducted via abstraction of visual and verbal feedback given by the participants. A direct assessment of the segmentation system is executed by the users via the system usability scale (SUS) and AttrakDiff-2 questionnaires. Furthermore, an approximation of the findings regarding usability aspects in those studies is introduced, conducted solely from the system-measurable user actions during their usage of interactive segmentation prototypes. The prediction of all questionnaire results has an average relative error of 8.9%, which is close to the expected precision of the questionnaire results themselves. This automated evaluation scheme may significantly reduce the resources necessary to investigate each variation of a prototype’s user interface (UI) features and segmentation methodologies.
format Article
id doaj-art-6ba8d87923b949508686aa55cb7c5ac0
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-4188
1687-4196
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
spelling doaj-art-6ba8d87923b949508686aa55cb7c5ac02025-02-03T06:13:07ZengWileyInternational Journal of Biomedical Imaging1687-41881687-41962019-01-01201910.1155/2019/14645921464592A Semi-Automated Usability Evaluation Framework for Interactive Image Segmentation SystemsMario Amrehn0Stefan Steidl1Reinier Kortekaas2Maddalena Strumia3Markus Weingarten4Markus Kowarschik5Andreas Maier6The Pattern Recognition Lab, Computer Science Department, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, GermanyThe Pattern Recognition Lab, Computer Science Department, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, GermanySiemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, GermanySiemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, GermanySiemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, GermanySiemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, GermanyThe Pattern Recognition Lab, Computer Science Department, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, GermanyFor complex segmentation tasks, the achievable accuracy of fully automated systems is inherently limited. Specifically, when a precise segmentation result is desired for a small amount of given data sets, semi-automatic methods exhibit a clear benefit for the user. The optimization of human computer interaction (HCI) is an essential part of interactive image segmentation. Nevertheless, publications introducing novel interactive segmentation systems (ISS) often lack an objective comparison of HCI aspects. It is demonstrated that even when the underlying segmentation algorithm is the same throughout interactive prototypes, their user experience may vary substantially. As a result, users prefer simple interfaces as well as a considerable degree of freedom to control each iterative step of the segmentation. In this article, an objective method for the comparison of ISS is proposed, based on extensive user studies. A summative qualitative content analysis is conducted via abstraction of visual and verbal feedback given by the participants. A direct assessment of the segmentation system is executed by the users via the system usability scale (SUS) and AttrakDiff-2 questionnaires. Furthermore, an approximation of the findings regarding usability aspects in those studies is introduced, conducted solely from the system-measurable user actions during their usage of interactive segmentation prototypes. The prediction of all questionnaire results has an average relative error of 8.9%, which is close to the expected precision of the questionnaire results themselves. This automated evaluation scheme may significantly reduce the resources necessary to investigate each variation of a prototype’s user interface (UI) features and segmentation methodologies.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1464592
spellingShingle Mario Amrehn
Stefan Steidl
Reinier Kortekaas
Maddalena Strumia
Markus Weingarten
Markus Kowarschik
Andreas Maier
A Semi-Automated Usability Evaluation Framework for Interactive Image Segmentation Systems
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
title A Semi-Automated Usability Evaluation Framework for Interactive Image Segmentation Systems
title_full A Semi-Automated Usability Evaluation Framework for Interactive Image Segmentation Systems
title_fullStr A Semi-Automated Usability Evaluation Framework for Interactive Image Segmentation Systems
title_full_unstemmed A Semi-Automated Usability Evaluation Framework for Interactive Image Segmentation Systems
title_short A Semi-Automated Usability Evaluation Framework for Interactive Image Segmentation Systems
title_sort semi automated usability evaluation framework for interactive image segmentation systems
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1464592
work_keys_str_mv AT marioamrehn asemiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT stefansteidl asemiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT reinierkortekaas asemiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT maddalenastrumia asemiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT markusweingarten asemiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT markuskowarschik asemiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT andreasmaier asemiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT marioamrehn semiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT stefansteidl semiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT reinierkortekaas semiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT maddalenastrumia semiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT markusweingarten semiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT markuskowarschik semiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems
AT andreasmaier semiautomatedusabilityevaluationframeworkforinteractiveimagesegmentationsystems