Prediction of Blasting Fragmentation Based on GWO-ELM

Aiming at the complex nonlinear relationship among factors affecting blasting fragmentation, the input weight and hidden layer threshold of ELM (extreme learning machine) were optimized by gray wolf optimizer (GWO) and the prediction model of GWO-ELM blasting fragmentation was established. Taking No...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhengzhao Jia, Ziling Song, Junfu Fan, Juyu Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Shock and Vibration
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7385456
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832547151791521792
author Zhengzhao Jia
Ziling Song
Junfu Fan
Juyu Jiang
author_facet Zhengzhao Jia
Ziling Song
Junfu Fan
Juyu Jiang
author_sort Zhengzhao Jia
collection DOAJ
description Aiming at the complex nonlinear relationship among factors affecting blasting fragmentation, the input weight and hidden layer threshold of ELM (extreme learning machine) were optimized by gray wolf optimizer (GWO) and the prediction model of GWO-ELM blasting fragmentation was established. Taking No. 2 open-pit coal mine of Dananhu as an example, seven factors including the rock tensile strength, compressive strength, hole spacing, row spacing, minimum resistance line, super depth, and specific charge are selected as the input factors of the prediction model. The average size of blasting fragmentation X50 is selected as the output factor of the prediction model and compared with the results of PSO-ELM and ELM. The results show that MAPE of GWO-ELM, PSO-ELM, and ELM are 1.78%, 5.40%, and 10.90%, respectively; their RMSE are 0.007, 0.022, and 0.045, respectively. The ELM model optimized by the gray wolf optimizer is more accurate and has stronger data fitting ability than PSO-ELM and ELM models, and the prediction accuracy of GWO-ELM is much higher than that of PSO-ELM and ELM.
format Article
id doaj-art-6b9bec3b5e9449b4bd273044d95281ee
institution Kabale University
issn 1875-9203
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Shock and Vibration
spelling doaj-art-6b9bec3b5e9449b4bd273044d95281ee2025-02-03T06:45:55ZengWileyShock and Vibration1875-92032022-01-01202210.1155/2022/7385456Prediction of Blasting Fragmentation Based on GWO-ELMZhengzhao Jia0Ziling Song1Junfu Fan2Juyu Jiang3College of MiningCollege of EnvironmentCollege of MiningCollege of MiningAiming at the complex nonlinear relationship among factors affecting blasting fragmentation, the input weight and hidden layer threshold of ELM (extreme learning machine) were optimized by gray wolf optimizer (GWO) and the prediction model of GWO-ELM blasting fragmentation was established. Taking No. 2 open-pit coal mine of Dananhu as an example, seven factors including the rock tensile strength, compressive strength, hole spacing, row spacing, minimum resistance line, super depth, and specific charge are selected as the input factors of the prediction model. The average size of blasting fragmentation X50 is selected as the output factor of the prediction model and compared with the results of PSO-ELM and ELM. The results show that MAPE of GWO-ELM, PSO-ELM, and ELM are 1.78%, 5.40%, and 10.90%, respectively; their RMSE are 0.007, 0.022, and 0.045, respectively. The ELM model optimized by the gray wolf optimizer is more accurate and has stronger data fitting ability than PSO-ELM and ELM models, and the prediction accuracy of GWO-ELM is much higher than that of PSO-ELM and ELM.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7385456
spellingShingle Zhengzhao Jia
Ziling Song
Junfu Fan
Juyu Jiang
Prediction of Blasting Fragmentation Based on GWO-ELM
Shock and Vibration
title Prediction of Blasting Fragmentation Based on GWO-ELM
title_full Prediction of Blasting Fragmentation Based on GWO-ELM
title_fullStr Prediction of Blasting Fragmentation Based on GWO-ELM
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Blasting Fragmentation Based on GWO-ELM
title_short Prediction of Blasting Fragmentation Based on GWO-ELM
title_sort prediction of blasting fragmentation based on gwo elm
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7385456
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengzhaojia predictionofblastingfragmentationbasedongwoelm
AT zilingsong predictionofblastingfragmentationbasedongwoelm
AT junfufan predictionofblastingfragmentationbasedongwoelm
AT juyujiang predictionofblastingfragmentationbasedongwoelm