Anthropometrics, Metabolic Syndrome, and Mortality Hazard

Independent indices (height, body mass index, a body shape index, and hip index) derived from basic anthropometrics have been found to be powerful predictors of mortality hazard, especially when the attributable risks are summed over these indices to give an anthropometric risk index (ARI). The meta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nir Y. Krakauer, Jesse C. Krakauer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Obesity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9241904
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832549380103602176
author Nir Y. Krakauer
Jesse C. Krakauer
author_facet Nir Y. Krakauer
Jesse C. Krakauer
author_sort Nir Y. Krakauer
collection DOAJ
description Independent indices (height, body mass index, a body shape index, and hip index) derived from basic anthropometrics have been found to be powerful predictors of mortality hazard, especially when the attributable risks are summed over these indices to give an anthropometric risk index (ARI). The metabolic syndrome (MS) is defined based on the co-occurrence of anthropometric, clinical, and laboratory criteria and is also widely employed for evaluating disease risk. Here, we investigate correlations between ARI and MS in a general population sample, the United States Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Baseline values of ARI and MS were also evaluated for their association with mortality over approximately 20 years of follow-up. ARI was found to be positively correlated with each component of MS, suggesting connections between the two entities as measures of cardiometabolic risk. ARI and MS were both significant predictors of mortality hazard. Although the association of ARI with mortality hazard was stronger than that of MS, a combined model with both ARI and MS score as predictors improved predictive ability over either construct in isolation. We conclude that the combination of anthropometrics and clinical and laboratory measurements holds the potential to increase the effectiveness of risk assessment compared to using either anthropometrics or the current components of MS alone.
format Article
id doaj-art-6b318d09b3474fd89455c14a0e6b922b
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0708
2090-0716
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Obesity
spelling doaj-art-6b318d09b3474fd89455c14a0e6b922b2025-02-03T06:11:30ZengWileyJournal of Obesity2090-07082090-07162018-01-01201810.1155/2018/92419049241904Anthropometrics, Metabolic Syndrome, and Mortality HazardNir Y. Krakauer0Jesse C. Krakauer1Department of Civil Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USAMetro Detroit Diabetes and Endocrinology, Southfield, MI, USAIndependent indices (height, body mass index, a body shape index, and hip index) derived from basic anthropometrics have been found to be powerful predictors of mortality hazard, especially when the attributable risks are summed over these indices to give an anthropometric risk index (ARI). The metabolic syndrome (MS) is defined based on the co-occurrence of anthropometric, clinical, and laboratory criteria and is also widely employed for evaluating disease risk. Here, we investigate correlations between ARI and MS in a general population sample, the United States Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Baseline values of ARI and MS were also evaluated for their association with mortality over approximately 20 years of follow-up. ARI was found to be positively correlated with each component of MS, suggesting connections between the two entities as measures of cardiometabolic risk. ARI and MS were both significant predictors of mortality hazard. Although the association of ARI with mortality hazard was stronger than that of MS, a combined model with both ARI and MS score as predictors improved predictive ability over either construct in isolation. We conclude that the combination of anthropometrics and clinical and laboratory measurements holds the potential to increase the effectiveness of risk assessment compared to using either anthropometrics or the current components of MS alone.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9241904
spellingShingle Nir Y. Krakauer
Jesse C. Krakauer
Anthropometrics, Metabolic Syndrome, and Mortality Hazard
Journal of Obesity
title Anthropometrics, Metabolic Syndrome, and Mortality Hazard
title_full Anthropometrics, Metabolic Syndrome, and Mortality Hazard
title_fullStr Anthropometrics, Metabolic Syndrome, and Mortality Hazard
title_full_unstemmed Anthropometrics, Metabolic Syndrome, and Mortality Hazard
title_short Anthropometrics, Metabolic Syndrome, and Mortality Hazard
title_sort anthropometrics metabolic syndrome and mortality hazard
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9241904
work_keys_str_mv AT nirykrakauer anthropometricsmetabolicsyndromeandmortalityhazard
AT jesseckrakauer anthropometricsmetabolicsyndromeandmortalityhazard